+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Hopes for solving Israeli-Palestinian conflict fall across the Mideast, poll finds

Only in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are majorities still inclined to support a two-state solution, while more than 40 percent of Lebanese, Jordanians, and Palestinians now say they no longer believe any solution is possible. 

By James J. Zogby

Palestinian youths burn tires next to Israel's separation wall in Qalandiya, in between Jerusalem and Ramallah, West Bank. (Flash90)

Palestinian youths burn tires next to Israel’s separation wall in Qalandiya, in between Jerusalem and Ramallah, West Bank. (Flash90)

Many Arabs appear to have lost faith in finding a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Only in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are majorities still inclined to support a two-state solution, while more than 40 percent of Lebanese, Jordanians, and Palestinians now say they no longer believe any solution is possible.

These are just some of the findings of the most recent Zogby Research Services (ZRS) nine-nation Middle East poll.

There is little confidence in the Trump Administration’s ability to resolve the conflict. Almost two-thirds of Lebanese, Jordanians, Iraqis, and Palestinians give the US Administration a no-confidence vote, while significantly higher percentages of Saudis, Egyptians, and Emiratis share that negative view of Trump’s efforts.

There is also little appetite for the much-discussed proposal to form an Arab-Israeli alliance to fight extremist groups and confront Iran’s regional role. About one-half of Egyptians, Saudis, Emiratis, and Iraqis would support such an alliance, only if “Israel were to end its occupation of Palestinian lands and fulfill the terms of the Arab Peace Initiative (API).” However, it is worth noting that one-half of Jordanians, Saudis, and Emiratis state that they would be opposed to such a partnership even if Israel were to fulfill the terms of the API.

With the occupation now in its 50th year, the outlook of Palestinians has become decidedly gloomy. One-third of Palestinians report that they or their family members have been victims of violence at the hands of the Israeli military or settlers. This has taken a toll. Two-thirds still support the API but, as has been noted, they have lost confidence in efforts to end the conflict. Almost two in five Palestinians now say they are ready for a one-state solution.

More than one-half are not satisfied with the performance of the Palestinian Authority and more than two-thirds are dissatisfied with Hamas. Seventy percent say they want the Palestinian parties to work for unity, but two-thirds have no confidence that such unity will actually be achieved.

High levels of anger directed at Israel and frustration with their own leadership among Palestinians coupled with a lack of confidence in U.S. intentions across the Arab World set the stage for the Trump Administration’s peace proposals. While we know that the public opinion does not, by itself, make policy, attention must be paid to the consequences of ignoring widely and deeply held views—especially in an area as sensitive as that of the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Iran is seen as playing a negative role across the Arab World. Only in Lebanon does a slight majority see relations with Iran as important. In every other Arab country, relations with Iran are viewed as unimportant—including Iraq where only 30 percent approve of relations with their powerful neighbor. Iran’s involvements in Syria and Iraq are viewed unfavorably by publics in every Arab country—including by Iraqis, themselves.

As for the “Iran Deal” (JCPOA), Arab opinion in most countries is deeply divided. A majority of Emiratis, and pluralities in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Iraq want to scrap the deal. Only in Lebanon and Saudi Arabia does support for the JCPOA reach as high as one-third.

Iranians, themselves, are disappointed with the JCPOA with only one-quarter of Iranians saying they are satisfied with its implementation. Three-quarters feel that while Iran has met its obligations, the West has not done so, with many expressing the view that the West has no intention of doing so because of continuing hostility toward Iran.

The impact of this frustration with the JCPOA and the feeling that the West remains hostile toward them has had a hardening impact on Iranian opinion. While the public’s support for their government’s involvements in regional conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen had steadily declined from high positive levels of support in 2014 to decidedly negative attitudes in 2016, in this year’s survey support for Iran’s regional adventures is back up to near 2014 levels. This backlash against the West has been the subject of recent news reports, but our survey provides the first hard evidence of this development.

This points to a dilemma for policy makers. Clearly Iran’s regional meddling must be challenged. It is nearly uniformly opposed by publics in every Arab country and, as has been noted, even Iraqis are wary of Iran’s involvement in their country. The challenge is to find a way forward to confront Iran’s regional role, hold them accountable for their nuclear program, while at the same time not solidifying Iranian support for their government’s foreign policies.

Each year, for the past seven, ZRS has been given the opportunity to poll public opinion across the Middle East for the Sir Bani Yas Forum, a gathering of thought leaders hosted by the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

This year ZRS surveyed 7,800 respondents in seven Arab countries (Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE), Turkey, and Iran. The face-to-face polling was conducted from August 24th to September 19th and covered a range of issues currently unfolding across the region.

James J. Zogby is the president of the Arab American Institute.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required