+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

The 'Holy Land Five' and the fight to delegitimize Palestine advocacy

Five Palestinian-American men are serving time for providing aid to Palestinian refugees. Their conviction 10 years ago spurred broader efforts to criminalize Palestine advocacy in the United States.

A Palestinian protester holds the Palestinian flag near the Israeli separation wall as Israeli security officers look on during a protest in the West Bank village of Bil'in near Ramallah on September 9, 2011. (Issam Rimawi/Flash90)

A Palestinian protester holds the Palestinian flag near the Israeli separation wall as Israeli security officers look on during a protest in the West Bank village of Bil’in near Ramallah on September 9, 2011.
(Issam Rimawi/Flash90)

Ten years ago, United States federal prosecutors shut down what was then the biggest Muslim charity in the country, a foundation supporting Palestinians refugees. Authorities seized all of the Holy Land Foundation’s assets and put five of its leaders in prison.

Over the past decade, the case has set into motion a broad and powerful effort to criminalize and sanction Palestine advocacy in the United States. It created a chilling effect that forces many Americans to think twice before supporting Palestinian or Muslim charities to this day.

Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the FBI raided the offices of Holy Land Foundation. In 2004, federal agents arrested five of the foundation’s leaders on charges of funneling material support for a designated terrorist organization — Hamas. After a second trial — the first resulted in a mistrial — they were sentenced to prison, two of them to 65 years.

“The mainstreaming of the idea that support for Palestinians is something that should be scrutinized originates with cases like Holy Land,” said Diala Shamas, an attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

“It starts with the material support framework, where any kind of support for Palestinians is labeled and smeared as support for terrorism, but you see that in the rhetoric today, it’s everywhere,” Shamas added.

Material support laws are intentionally kept vague and broadly-defined, and they have had a significant chilling effect on several civil rights issues in the United States, according to Shamas.

Furthermore, targeting the Holy Land Foundation had a very intended political effect; it mattered that the government was not only going after what was at the time the largest Muslim charity in America, but also one that was focused on providing relief to Palestinians.

“These people were convicted for providing charity,” Nancy Hollander, the defense attorney who represented Abu Baker, told +972. “They were never charged with, convicted or arrested for any violent act. The government chased every dime that they spent, and knew where it all went, and it went to charity. It’s just that the government’s position was that they were feeding the wrong kids.”

Crowdfund banner 600px

Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development was established in 1989 to provided humanitarian aid primarily to Palestinians in need, through zakat (charity) communities in the West Bank and Gaza.

The first court case in 2007 resulted in a mistrial, after the government failed to convince jurors that the charity supported Hamas in any way. But at the end of the second trial, two years later, Shukri Abu Baker, Ghassan Elashi, Mufid Abdulqader, Mohammad El-Mezain and Abdulrahman Odeh were convicted on 108 charges for providing more than $12 million to Hamas.

In both trials — and for the first time in the history of American criminal trials — a witness was allowed to testify anonymously. The defense was not allowed to know his name or identity, and could not research the veracity of his statements. His anonymity extended even to the judge. With that decision, the constitutional right to confront one’s accuser was “totally violated,” Hollander wrote in a 2013 article.

“The law did not matter. The facts did not matter. What mattered was that these were Palestinian men providing charity and feeding Palestinian children and in the name of national security we simply could not let it happen,” she explained in the article.

During these trials, however, not a single charity that the Holy Land contributed to was on the designated terrorist list in the U.S. In fact, USAID and UN agencies were supporting some of those very organizations as well.

The case affected the five men, their families and communities, and the very notion of charitable giving. “I regularly advise people on how they have to navigate these laws, and the mere fact that they have to seek legal opinions before making a donation is debilitating,” said Shamas.



“The efforts to undermine advocacy for Palestinian rights today — which include laws that punish boycotts, lawsuits targeting nonprofits working in Palestine, and massive smear campaigns to intimidate people into silence — are extensions of such criminalization” as in the case of the Holy Land Foundation, said Dima Khalidi, founder of the Chicago-based Palestinian rights advocacy group, Palestine Legal.

As of November, 26 states have enacted anti-BDS laws. Last year, a group of Republican and Democratic senators attempted to pass the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act that would have made it a felony to support the international boycott of Israel. The bill didn’t make it through that time after civil liberties groups intervened, but just a few days ago Democratic senator Ben Cardin of Maryland tried to slip the anti-boycott law back into a spending bill.

Correction: An earlier version of this article mistakenly noted that the anonymous witness was only introduced in the second trial. The witness had testified in both the first and second court cases. The article was also updated on Dec. 10, 2018 to reflect the most recent information available on anti-BDS laws enacted in the United States.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Bruce Gould

      This is relevant both to this article and https://972mag.com/israel-defund-972-magazine/139073/ :

      The federal and state governments simply lack the power to pass any law whose purpose is “aimed at the SUPPRESSION OF IDEAS,” that has the “purpose to favor one faith over another,” or that has the “purpose to disapprove of a particular religion.” (italics mine)


      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        This article by Henrietta Chacar is vitally important documentation, vitally important exposure of an appalling perversion of American justice taking place. Which is why Bruce is right to link this piece by Chacar and the +972 piece about the Israeli government trying to defund +972 Magazine with the article by Bowie and Litman–a valuable, educational companion piece. Everyone should read it. The three articles taken together tell an incredibly important, coherent story.

        +972 Magazine with this and it’s related series of recent articles is at the forefront of something very important and relevant to Americans, Europeans and Israelis in this time, telling a story that needs to be told about attempts by the Israeli government and its allies to shut down basic press freedoms and subvert basic American Constitutional rights.

        Please donate to +972 Magazine this holiday season.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Baladi Akka 1948

      If my memory is correct the anonymous witness was an Israeli intelligence officer.
      There’s a two part documentary from 2016 on the case on youtube: The Holy Land Five al-Jazeera World.
      Another emblematic case is the “US vs al-Arian”, a prominent Palestinian scholar, Norwegian filmmaker Line Halvorsen made a 100 min documentary available online for free: http://www.shagfilms.com/films/title/usa_vs_al_arian
      You gotta see it to believe it.
      Al-Arian has since been expelled from the US where he’d lived for decades, at the same time Hollywood stars can openly raise funding for the terrorist army of Israel.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Lewis from Afula

      The 5 are illegitmate as are the 100, 10,000 or 2 million so-called “fakestinyans”. The only sane resolution is their permanent relocation back to the East Bank. Their properties should be confiscated by Israel as payback for all their misery they caused us over the last 100 years.

      Reply to Comment