+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Following right-wing attacks, museum seeks to cancel 'Right of Return Conference'

Tel Aviv’s Eretz Israel Museum has been under increasing pressure to cancel Zochrot’s second international conference. Recently, the museum presented new conditions to the organizers, including paying for increased security and changing the wording on the event invitation.

Palestinian student speaks at a Nakba commemoration event outside Tel Aviv University, May 2013. The Israeli right has been trying to ban any mention of the Nakba in recent years – even in the Palestinian school system (photo: Activestills.org)

An international conference by Zochrot, an Israeli NGO which focuses on the Nakba and the “right of return,” is under threat, following pressure from right-wing organizations.

The Eretz Israel Museum, where Zochrot decided to host the event, has recently informed organizers that due to the risk of demonstrations and public disorder, they will need to pay for increased, onsite security. The museum management has also demanded that the name “Al-Shaykh Muwannis” mentioned next to the museum’s name in the event invitations be removed.

“Al-Shaykh Muwannis” is a Palestinian village that was located in what is today’s north Tel Aviv, and which stood where the museum and the Tel Aviv University are currently located.

The conference, titled “From Truth to Redress” is due to take place on September 29-30. The museum has informed Zochrot that the event will be canceled, should the organization not meet the new requirements. In response, Attorney Michael Sfard sent a letter on behalf of Zochrot to the museum, stating that backing away from the agreement would be “an illegal act” and “would constitute intellectual and ideological discrimination.”

Invitation to the Zochrot conference on the Nakba and the Right of Return in Tel Aviv

The introduction to the Zochrot Conference states:

This year, Zochrot will hold its second international, multidisciplinary conference to discuss practical aspects of the Return of Palestinian refugees grounded in the transitional justice principles of acknowledgement, accountability and a joint Jewish-Palestinian process of redress.

The issues discussed in this conference will focus on the implication of Return for the country’s physical, cultural and economic space, on the nature of its future society, the status of Palestinians and Jews living here, the nature of its regime, and last but not least, the practicalities of returning property after 65 years of refugeehood and the destruction of Palestinian life on the one hand, and the establishment of a Jewish State and the resulting new reality on the other. The conference will discuss the key question of whether there is a single path to realizing Return.

Israeli right-wing groups have focused their efforts in recent years on banning any mention of the Nakba in the public discourse. Among other things, they have attempted to cancel history classes in universities which refer to the Nakba, and in 2009, then Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar renewed the ban on any mention of the Nakba in history books taught at Palestinian schools. A law passed by the Knesset in 2011 and approved by the Supreme Court allowed the finance minister to withhold budgets from state-supported institutions – museums and universities among them – which hold activities that mourn the events that led to the establishing of the state or that object to the definition of Israel as a Jewish state.

Right-wing groups, among them Im Tirzu, have urged Finance Minister Yair Lapid to withraw public funding form the Eretz Yisrael Museum if it allows Zochrot to hold its conference.

Zochrot General Director Liat Rosenberg said in a statement: “In presenting its new demands, the Eretz Israel Museum is caving in to political coercion, threats and bullying by anti-democratic forces intent on delivering a fatal blow to freedom of speech. Violent attempts at silencing by those who would rather not see or hear are encouraged by the museum’s actions. By intervening in the contents of the invitation and imposing financial sanctions against the NGO, the museum has become their mouthpiece. Nevertheless, these recent attempts at censoring, silencing, and otherwise removing from the agenda the call for the return of Palestinian refugees and the Israeli public’s responsibility for redressing this ongoing historical injustice – are bound to fail.”

Last year, the police prevented Zochrot activists from distributing leaflets on the Israeli Independence Day.

Police besiege, arrest activists planning to commemorate Nakba
High Court ruling on ‘Nakba Law’ reveals its waning power

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Danny

      It must be a heavy burden to be a right-wing Israeli these days, especially for those right-wingers whose faith in their cause is less than absolute – hence their aggressive and defensive posturing at any mention of a different narrative.

      I actually feel sorry for members of Im Tirzu, as their world must be a terrifying place to live in (from their perspective, of course).

      Reply to Comment
      • Haifawi

        I dated one for a few months. She was quite naive and uninformed, and many of the foot soldiers in Hertzl’s Army were the same. However, the commanders just want power and privilege.

        Reply to Comment
        • Danny

          I imagine dating one of these people is pretty difficult and requires a high threshold for nonsense and ignorance. Personally, I could never go out with someone who would elicit my contempt so easily (no matter how good-looking they were).

          Reply to Comment
          • Haifawi

            I thought I could swing her over. To her credit, she even visited my friend’s village in the West Bank. In the end, it didn’t work out because she hates sarcasm and doesn’t believe in evolution.

            Reply to Comment
      • Kolumn9

        Actually it is easier than ever, if not trivial, to be a right-wing Israeli. Our narrative is the standard and consistently reinforced. Our view of the world is being validated on a regular basis with the events that are happening around us while those clinging to the idea that the problem in the Middle East is Israel are basically laughing stock conspiracy theorists at this point. Those with the ‘different narrative’ are mostly seen as a tiny minority of foreign-sponsored extremists who need to resort to provocations to get attention. They can’t win an election and exist as a visible group primarily as a result of the European funding of extreme left-wing NGOs like Zochrot.

        Reply to Comment
    2. “the practicalities of returning property after 65 years of refugeehood and the destruction of Palestinian life on the one hand, and the establishment of a Jewish State and the resulting new reality on the other. The conference will discuss the key question of whether there is a single path to realizing Return.” : This is a rather unpolarized formulation of the right of return and I would think those wary of more uncompromised forms would want this one in public space.

      The US dealt with dispossessed Native Americans only at the margin. Israel does not have the luxury of 150 years without instantaneous electronic media. One of the core burdens of Israel is that it is being called into question for doing what others have done as well–indeed, the ingathering a response to what others have done.

      Reply to Comment
    3. “You never change things by fighting the existing reality, to change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
      Buckminster Fuller

      Reply to Comment
    4. Richard

      Syria and Egypt are burning. The self-defeating and distorted version of political morality and that seeks to bring attention to the events described in this article is becoming more absurd to more people every day.

      Reply to Comment
    5. Tomer

      Will Zochrot ever discuss the Mizrahi Jews’ rights in Iraq, Syria,Egypt, Yemen, Morrocco etc OR will the “the right to return” be limited to Arabs’ rights?

      I believe that focusing on the rights of Arab refugees but IGNORING Jewish refugees will simply constitute Antisemitism. A solution must engage both wrongs simultaneous.

      Reply to Comment