+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

EU politicians to Israeli MKs: NGOs aren't enemies of the state

Fifty MEPs send an open letter to their Israeli counterparts urging them to abandon legislation that singles out European-funded human rights and peace NGOs while not touching right-wing organizations.

By Davide Lerner

Members of the European Parliament during a vote at the European Parliament in Strasbourg. (EU Photo)

Members of the European Parliament during a vote at the European Parliament in Strasbourg. (EU Photo)

Dozens of members of the European Parliament published a harshly worded open letter to all members of the Israeli Knesset on Tuesday regarding the controversial “NGO law,” a new bill that selectively imposes transparency requirements on those largely left-wing associations receiving more than half of their funding from abroad. The bill passed the first of three readings in the Knesset late Monday night.

The letter, promoted by UK Labour MEP Julie Ward, calls on the Israeli Knesset to reject the legislation. “We strongly urge you to be brave and strong in upholding Israel’s pluralist democratic values,” a passage of the letter says. “Human rights and peace-building NGOs serve as watchdogs for democracy, not enemies of the state.”

Asserting that the occupation is not an internal Israeli matter, the letter notes that the EU “funds the Palestinian Authority, without which [Israel’s] administration of the Palestinian Territories would not be viable.”

The document has been signed by 50 MEPs, but Julie Ward’s assistants claim many more asked to support it after the deadline had passed. The majority comes from leftist groups like the Greens and the Gue/Ngl, which includes parties like Syriza (Greece), Podemos (Spain) and Sinn Féin (Ireland). Also the center-left Socialist and Democrats group, the second biggest in the Parliament after the center-right European People’s Party, expressed its support with 11 signatures. No MEPs from mainstream right-wing groups, let alone Nigel Farage’s “Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy,” have agreed to co-sign the letter.

The document comes amid a period of great tensions between Israel and the EU, peaking with the European Commission’s interpretative notice on labelling last November. The decision to label Israeli settlements products enraged the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, whose diplomatic efforts to block the move were however fruitless. In a letter to European Parliament President Martin Schulz at the time Netanyahu complained of an anti-Israeli “double-standard,” quoting “nearly 200 territorial disputes worldwide” which have not been subject to trade limitations of sorts. Specifically, he insisted on the case of Northern Cyprus which came under Turkish control in 1974.

Underlying the periodic standoffs between EU officials and members of the Israeli government is Israel’s shift to an unprecedented cultural hegemony of the right. As Noam Sheizaf wrote late last year, the right has become the “zeitgeist” of Israeli democracy. Illiberal moves like the NGO bill have suddenly become permissible as representative of “the will of the people,” Sheizaf wrote. A creeping tyranny of the majority seems to be breeding in the Holy Land.

As progressive views of the conflict are crushed or altogether banned, EU institutions grow weary of repeating the two states mantra while Israel turns it into an actual pipe dream on the ground. Likewise, Israeli policy-makers grow weary of seeing the Green Line quoted in EU legislative documents as they try to erase it by presenting the occupation as a “fait accompli,” a non-negotiable “fact on the ground.” For this very reason the directive on labelling was perceived as a huge blow, although inconsequential in terms of Israeli exports to the EU. While still reluctant to scale-up its use of market power to pressure Israel, the EU was enshrining opposition to the occupation into documents of near-law.

The latest letter from the European Parliament, which specifically addresses the “Transparency Bill,” warns that “all the European funds and benefits that Israel enjoys is based on Israel’s commitment to human rights, democracy, end of occupation, and the peace process, leading to a viable and just two-state solution.” Diplomatic warnings are increasingly pointing in the direction of market measures, while Israel pivots ever further to the right.

Davide Lerner is an Italian journalist who has written about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on publications like “l’Espresso”, Italy’s first weekly, and TPI, a fast-growing international politics online magazine. He currently lives in Brussels.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Joseph

      The Irony of BDS supporting MEPs who have accused Israel of ethic cleansing, suddenly caring about “upholding Israel’s pluralist democratic values”.

      Reply to Comment
      • Soroush

        Humanity has many disease one of the most malignant ones is when people based on a story book feel entitled to something and are willing to commit mass murder!

        Reply to Comment
    2. Sebastian

      Reasonable article except for the following.
      “As progressive views of the conflict are crushed or altogether banned, ”

      There are no “progressive” views that are banned in any way shape or form in Israel. Even the NGO bill is only going to ensure foreign sources are declared on literature, but there are no penalties whatsoever for any views at all. The only exception is Islamofacist incitment, which is also banned in most countries.

      Regarding “progressive views” being crushed, that’s really only because progressives tend to be devoid of real world reality. Unfortunately, Israel lives in the real word reality that the progressives will never encounter when they form their left wing utopian suggestions from a comfortable couch over a coffee with their artist friends. This is why progressives rarely come up with anything better than “we should pursue a 2 state solution” and “settlements are bad mkay” and “if you kill a terrorists, that will only serve to create many more” before tapping themselves on the back in self-rightouts self-approval. However, in practice, none of these views survive the real world reality that Israelis experience every day of every week of every month of every year of every decade.

      The “progressive” utopian dillusions are like that of a first world war soldier dreaming of honour, courage and glory on his way to the trenches totally clueless about the real world reality of constant shelling, desease, mustard gas attacks and the smell of random death.

      So yes, “progressive” utopian and frankly idiotic and stupid views get totally crushed in Israel. This isn’t because they are not given a fair hearing. It’s precisely because they are given a fair hearing. The ONLY reason “progressive” utopian ideas do far worse in Israel than in the West generally is that they get totally crushed by overwhelming and undeniable evidence; evidence that is not as readily available in other nations and when it is available, the Palestinians make up lies and smears to ensure the rest of the world questions the authenticity of the undisputably true hard evidence one gets from the Israeli side.

      Of course, the Palestinians try the same lies and smears in Israel too but the difference is Israelis are the ones who have actually experienced the truth so Palestinian lies and smeers have very little effect there.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Israelis are full of delusions, illusions and willful ignorance about what is done in their name on the other side of the green line, and when Breaking the Silence tells them Israelis refuse to listen and attack them as “traitors.” And whine when BtS then goes outside Israel. So spare us the lectures on how much Israelis live in reality. The opposite is the case.

        Reply to Comment
      • Tzedek

        Yeah, in the name of “reality”, let’s attack organizations that document the damages of the occupation or discrimination faced by Palestinian citizens of Israel.
        Like in the glory days of the former soviet Union, reality is what the officials of the glorious army and the State apparatus say it is: screw these pesky lawyers, sociologists, historians or investigative journalists who try to document the empirical situation on the ground, it’s all just a foreign conspiracy (hence the bill) ;).

        Reply to Comment