+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Eritreans in Israel face unique obstacles in protesting for their country's future

Had the Israeli media paid attention to a protest by Eritrean refugees outside their embassy last week, the public would have learned something valuable about the Eritrean community in Israel: they desperately want a better future for their country so that one day soon, they can go home.

By Sigal Rozen

Eritrean refugees living in Israel take part in a protest outside the Eritrean embassy in the city of Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, February 1. 2013. The protesters were calling for the ousting of the dictatorship regime in Eritrea, and the release of all political prisoners. (Photo by: Yotam Ronen/Activestills.org)

Over 200 Eritrean refugees gathered last Friday, despite the rain and a storm, in front of the Eritrean embassy in Ramat Gan to express their support for Eritrean soldiers who rebelled last week and took over the Eritrean Ministry of Information’s building in the capital Asmara. For a moment, it seemed that the 22 years of brutal dictatorship headed by Isaias Afewerki were about to come to an end. Had Israelis paid attention to the protest, they would have learned something valuable about the Eritrean community in Israel: they desperately want a better future for their country so that one day soon, they can go home.

In the past week, throngs of exiled Eritrean refugees gathered in capitals around the world to express their support for the brave soldiers who dared to challenge the regime. Eritrean protesters stormed the embassies in Rome and London, the embassies whose representatives terrorized the Eritreans in those countries of asylum in an effort to extort from them a 2 percent “exile tax.”

The Eritrean refugees in Israel also held a protest in solidarity with the soldiers who rebelled, made speeches and repeated the demands made by the soldiers:

1. The immediate resignation of the dictator Isayas Afwerki
2. The immediate release of all political prisoners
3. The immediate implementation of Eritrea’s constitution

Videos from protests of Eritrean refugees around the world and in Israel present Eritrean communities that are highly politically aware, united, coordinated, and filled with the desire to return to their beloved homeland Eritrea and establish a democracy there, similar to the kind they were exposed to in their countries of asylum, which granted them refugee status and usually also citizenship.

But there is a great difference between the communities of Eritrean refugees around the world and the community in Israel.

Eritrean communities live and flourish throughout the Western world. In Israel, the community barely survives. While the vast majority of Eritreans in Western countries have been granted citizenship in their country of asylum, the asylum requests of Eritreans in Israel are not even examined. Eritrean refugees are detained without trial, and those who are not incarcerated are forced to subsist without a work visa, support from the state or social services. They are labeled by decision-makers and the Israeli media as “work infiltrators” to ensure public animosity toward them and decision makers from time to time make announcements about their impending deportation to Eritrea or some other African country to guarantee the Eritrean community in Israel lives in constant fear.

The Eritrean refugees in Italy and the U.K. were unwelcome guests in the embassies of the dictatorship that forced them into exile, but as they did not harm the embassy or its staff, all they had to deal with were the hostile stares of the pro-regime embassy staff. On the other hand, any attempt by the Eritrean refugees to breach the embassy in Israel could have resulted in their arrest and incarceration without trial for a period of three years under the Anti-Infiltration Law.

Despite the daily hardship, hundreds of Eritreans chose to forgo a day’s pay to stand outside the Eritrean embassy in the pouring rain and demand what all citizens of democratic countries take for granted: “a country where every Eritrean is respected regardless of their personal background, their religion, political affiliation, ethnicity or personal views … a country where people can live without fear or spies, prisons, slavery and poverty”.

Foreign media arrived to cover the protest, but the Israeli media was absent. This is unfortunate because Israeli citizens and decision-makers should be made aware of the how much the Eritrean refugees in Israel wish to return to their homeland. If Israel stopped its support of the brutal rule of Afewerki, they would further, even a little, the laudable goal of the brave Eritrean refugees: “justice for all Eritreans.”

Sigal Rozen was among the founders of the NGO “Hotline for Migrant Workers” (HMW) in 1998. Sigal is the Public Policy and Foreign Media Coordinator at the HMW, established to defend the rights of migrant workers and refugees in Israel, and to combat human trafficking.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. To say the obvious, an “exhile tax” has no jurisdiction in a foreign State and, without enabling legislation in these, should be considered criminal exortion leading to diplomatic expulsion.

      Since several EU countries have granted Eritreans refugee status, these decisions could be used for comparative support of a claim in Israel. The whole idea here is that countries can pool their resources to determine when refugee status seems legitimate; a focal country could still deny the general class, but such denial would have a higher bar.

      Reply to Comment