+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Equality could be the ultimate deterrence to violence

If the Israeli security establishment is looking for a proper way to put an end to violence, a little equality in the eyes of the law might go a long way.

By Talal Jabari

A Palestinian family sits in the remains of their demolished home in the West Bank village of Um Alkahiar, South Hebron Hills, April 6, 2016. (photo: Wissam Hashlamon/Flash90)

A Palestinian family sits in the remains of their demolished home in the West Bank village of Um Alkahiar, South Hebron Hills, April 6, 2016. (photo: Wissam Hashlamon/Flash90)

One of my very first assignments as a young journalist was to go to Shuafat Refugee Camp in East Jerusalem to take pictures and gather quotes pertaining to the demolition of several homes that day. I remember looking on as the bulldozers went about their work, and as the residents of the homes, male and female, wept helplessly as they watched their life’s savings collapse into neat piles of rubble.

The demolished homes didn’t belong to so-called terrorists; the residents were accused of building without permits, which is a topic for another article. But suffice to say, it felt like a painful event for the recipients of the demolition orders.

The fact is that since 1967, according to the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD), the Israeli government has destroyed on average about 1,000 Palestinian “structures” a year. That’s a little under three structures a day.

For full disclosure, a “structure” could mean anything from a chicken coop to a nine-story apartment building.

Of the more than 48,000 structures Israel demolished since 1967, hundreds were destroyed as a punitive measure, in the aftermath of a Palestinian attack — even a failed attack. Logic would suggest that the very fact that Israel has had to demolish hundreds of homes rather than a few dozen means the tactic has not been a very effective deterrent. An Israeli army commission came to the same conclusion in 2005, publishing a report that put an end to the practice of punitive demolitions.

To clarify, until 2005 the Israeli government destroyed hundreds of Palestinian homes that belonged to suspected perpetrators or planners of attacks or their families. In the vast majority of those cases, those suspects had ceased to live in those homes — they were either dead, incarcerated, or on the run. The result of such a punitive demolition is that the people who are actually penalized are the suspect’s families who most of the time, by the Israeli military’s own admission, had nothing to do with the actions that prompted the destruction of their homes.

So why are we still discussing a practice that was halted in 2005? In it’s infinite wisdom, the Israeli security establishment decided to ignore the findings of two military committees and the research of top Israeli journalists, and nearly a decade later, in the summer of 2014, decided to reinstate punitive house demolitions, with a vengeance. A total of 29 homes were destroyed by Israeli punitive demolitions between October 2015 and January 2016, according to Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

The summer of 2014, you may recall, was the summer in which three Israelis were kidnapped and killed in the southern West Bank. Israel labeled the perpetrators terrorists, killed them, and demolished their families’ homes. That same summer, three other individuals whom Israel labeled as terrorists kidnapped and bludgeoned a teenager before dousing him with gasoline and setting burning him alive. The perpetrators were arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced, and yet their families continue to enjoy the comfort of their homes.

 (Suha (C), the mother of Palestinian teenager Mohammed Abu Khdeir, who was murdered last year, sits in the district court in Jerusalem on November 30, 2015. The Jerusalem court convicted two Israeli minors of the kidnapping and burning alive of a Palestinian teenager in the run-up to the 2014 Gaza war, while the third defendant Yosef Haim Ben-David's mental state will be evaluated. Mohammed Abu Khdeir, 16, was abducted and killed on July 2, 2014, weeks after the kidnapping and murder of three Israeli teenagers in the West Bank. Activestills.org)

(Suha (C), the mother of Palestinian teenager Mohammed Abu Khdeir, who was murdered last year, sits in the district court in Jerusalem on November 30, 2015. (photo: Activestills.org)

And when the victim, Mohammed Abu Khdeir’s family petitioned the court to have the homes of the three terrorists destroyed, the Israeli security establishment’s answer was: “Given the scale of the phenomenon of seriously hostile crimes in the Jewish community, the need to implement this [deterrent] does not arise.”

Would the demolition of Abu Khdeir’s killers’ homes have prevented the murders of the Dawabsheh family, who were also burned alive a year later? Maybe; maybe not. But the fact remains that home demolitions are yet another symptom of a justice system that is completely biased against Palestinians, and which implements different and far harsher penalties on Arabs than on Jews.

If you won’t take my word for it, perhaps you will consider a recent experiment conducted by Israel’s Channel 10 television news, which asked both an Arab and a Jewish citizen to publish posts on Facebook calling for revenge killings. Within just a few hours, the Jewish Israeli’s post received over 1,000 likes and more than 30 shares, while the Palestinian’s post only received seven likes. The Palestinian found himself in a police interrogation room; the Jew received messages of support.

If the Israeli security establishment is looking for a proper deterrent, a little equality in the eyes of the law might go a long way. After all, it could keep a lot of innocent people from unnecessarily becoming homeless.

Talal Jabari is a Palestinian award-winning documentary filmmaker and journalist from East Jerusalem. He tweets from @TalalJabari.

Newsletter banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Rascal

      Equality presupposes the end of the pipe dream of a “Jewish” state. Therefore the majority of Jewish Israelis, who favor privileging Jews over all others within the state, and the complete lack of protections for minorities, mean the end of “Zionism” as it is and has been practiced. You can see the end of this bad idea coming faster as the Jews continue to use more and more brutality and illegality to try to maintain control. It would almost be funny if it weren’t so sad. As the Jews grasp tighter and tighter, the Palestinians keep winning. Why? Because all they have to do is survive. As the Jews keep moving down the apartheid path, throwing over any pretense of modern democracy for the Jewish fascist state, the specter of antisemitism will arise. Why? Because as the Jews around the world defend the indefensible Israeli policies without condemning such policies, many gentiles will stop making the differences between Jews and will begin to see them as a monolithic entity deserving of opprobrium. The Jews will chalk it up to “antisemitism” failing to see that they have played a significant part in unleashing the monster.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Rascal

      Equality presupposes the end of the pipe dream of a Jewish state. You can see the end of this bad idea coming faster as the Jews continue to use more and more brutality and illegality to try to maintain control. It would almost be funny if it weren’t so sad. As the Jews grasp tighter and tighter, the Palestinians keep winning. Why? Because all they have to do is survive. As the Jews keep moving down the apartheid path, favoring the privileging of Jews over all others within the state the handwriting is on the wall. The bastardization of democracy as majority rule combined with the complete lack of protections for minorities, means the end of Zionism as it is and has been practiced, throwing over any pretense of modern democracy for a Jewish fascist state. And as Jewish Israelis move farther down this path, the specter of antisemitism will arise. Why? Because as the Jews around the world defend the indefensible Israeli policies without condemning such policies, many gentiles will stop making the differences between Jews and will begin to see them as a monolithic entity deserving of opprobrium. The Jews will chalk it up to antisemitism failing to see that they have played a significant part in unleashing the monster. Perhaps the answer lies within Orthodox practice. Instead of having a “Shabbas goy” to turn on light etc., the Israelis should modify the concept for a “Governing goy’ to run the government itself. After all, such a goy couldn’t make more of a hash of governing than those already in power.

      Reply to Comment