+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Profiting off war: A look into the world of Israeli arms dealing

War in Israel has become a constant source of profit, with the West Bank and Gaza Strip used as experimental sites for arms dealers backed up by intellectuals. These are the protagonists of ‘The Lab,’ a new film by Yotam Feldman. In its exceptional interviews, the film reveals that the image of the arms dealer operating in the shadows is a thing of the past.

By Eilat Maoz (Translated from Hebrew by Guy Eliav, edited by Ami Asher)

IDF tanks gather near Gaza Strip in preparation for a possible ground invasion. The Israeli government has authorized drafting 75,000 reservists for the next stages in the military campaign (photo: Actiestills)

A laboratory is a site where scientists conduct experiments under controlled conditions – a space where large-scale phenomena such as hurricanes are miniaturized and tiny objects such as microbes are magnified to observe complex processes and learn how to control them. A laboratory is where the world is divided into predictable phenomena and observable objects. Where knowledge is created and later disseminated, making the world better understandable and better organized, through the lens of the knowledge we have accumulated about it.

Yotam Feldman’s new film, “The Lab,” introduces us to the men who made the Occupied Palestinian Territories the largest and most advanced weapon-testing laboratory: arms dealers and developers, defense experts and industry leaders. Despite the urge to compare it to other Israeli documentaries which have recently exposed the secret lives of the people running the occupation (such as “The Law in These Parts” and “The Gatekeepers”), “The Lab” is above all a film about knowledge. Security knowledge created in the flexible zone between two dimensions separated by a very blurred line: the military and the market.

On the first plot level, “The Lab” follows Naomi Klein’s claim that the main reason for Israel’s economic prosperity at a time of political instability and global crisis lies not in its outstanding human capital that enables it to smoothly escape the negative economic repercussions, but rather the continuation of regional conflicts. In The Shock Doctrine, she shows that most of Israel’s economic growth can be attributed to the huge defense industry, which has become Israel’s main export industry, particularly following 9/11 (In 2012, Israel was ranked the world’s sixth largest arms exporter). She also claims that the West Bank and Gaza Strip are not only the world’s largest open-air prisons, but also the world’s largest test-labs, where “Palestinians are no longer just targets. They are guinea pigs.”

For Feldman, recent military campaigns, primarily Operation Cast Lead, illustrate the transformed nature of war: from a temporary disturbance involving damage to life and property, to a fixed, profitable state of affairs. Thus, the film joins other voices seeking to assess the profits derived from the occupation, and not its alleged costs to the Israeli society. The film’s true power is revealed, however, not when it shows up uninvited to closed events in order to confront the profiteers, but in the exceptional interviews held with them. These reveal that every arms dealer has a worldview that is quickly unfolded in front of the camera. Warmongers, it seems, no longer operate in the shadows. If arms are sold in the open market, they should be treated like any other commodity, and since what is hidden cannot be sold, the veil of secrecy must be quickly removed from the security market, turning the occupation from a disgraceful well-known secret into a selling point.

Captivating success stories of Israeli field commanders who mobilize their hands-on combat experience to sell more arms reinforce the impression that the occupation provides lucrative economic opportunities. At the same time, the stories suggest that the intimate relationship between the military and the economy in Israel is bigger than the sum total of all personal relations between military professionals and businessmen or from a few field commanders with a business acumen. In international conferences where Israeli models proudly present weapons to eager men, it appears that the Israeli Defense Ministry operates as Israel’s chief export agent. This is where the boundary between the “economic” and “political” collapses, and where the phrase ‘economic strength’ is revealed to be more than just a rhetorical pun: it is a work plan. A plan founded on the assumption that security is a product the country supplies to its law-abiding citizens, and that a strong economy is the basis for military strength. Whereby the state’s role in expanding the defense industry is naturally given, since it supports “growth,” and defense exports – even when completely private – are seen as a national success story. To borrow from cinematic terminology, the Israeli defense industry is a clear case of co-production.

Importantly, this co-production has a third partner: Israeli academia. One of the film’s most intriguing aspects is that it interweaves the stories of weapon inventors and arms dealers with those of scientists and intellectuals.

Military philosopher Shimon Naveh takes us to a desert training base, modeled on a Palestinian town. With a Nike T-shirt, military camouflage pants and round hipster glasses, he walks around the ghost town, explaining how French philosophy has helped him come up with a military doctrine suitable for postmodern warfare: deconstruction, but of urban space. Bluntly put, the doctrine is based on drilling holes in the walls of residential houses and moving like a rhizome outside paved roads. Naveh can thus take credit for the destruction wrought by the IDF as it reoccupied West Bank cities during Operation Defensive Shield.

At the Social Sciences Building at Tel Aviv University, we meet Prof. Yitzhak Ben Israel, who is busy developing mathematical models predicting the success rates of targeted killings and arrests. His models enable him to predict, using a simple substitution formula, the number of people that need to be killed in order to bring about the collapse of an entire organization or political system. Ben Israel’s research is just one example for the thriving security-knowledge industry in Israeli academia, that even the few Israeli academics who publicly oppose the occupation tend to ignore.

Feldman’s hybrids – cyborgs of science, technology and military – dramatically expose the far-reaching repercussions of the migration of knowledge from the Israeli lab to the rest of the world. For example, Israeli riot control technologies sold to Brazilian police for fighting drug dealers cast Rio’s favelas in the shape of Palestinian refugee camps; Kabul is reminiscent of Baghdad, which in turn looks like Jenin. This similarity is more than the product of Orientalist imagining or the hatred of the poor and black (although these are certainly important factors): it is forms of knowledge, hi-tech industry products, which make these spaces so disturbingly similar.

Eilat Maoz is PhD student at the Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago. Her work focuses on the political economy of violence and she supports the Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Philos

      “transformed nature of war: from a temporary disturbance involving damage to life and property, to a fixed, profitable state of affairs.”
      Wars profitability has been its sine qua non for most of human history. It was only in the two world wars that war became too expensive for belligerents and thus unpopular as means of political action. Well, except for the USA. The USA profited hugely from both world wars. But the idea that war has only be a temporary or costly state of affairs does not reflect history. Wars frequency can be linked to its profitability. If it wasn’t profitable (in the broad meaning of the word not just the financial) to some people it wouldn’t exist.

      Reply to Comment
    2. rsgengland

      Israel is also in the forefront of water conservation technology.
      Should Israel not do this because she is in a desert where water is in seriously short supply, and just wither away in drought.
      Medical research in Israel is outstanding in both scope and volume.
      Must Israel not do medical research because it might make the lives of Israelis, and the world for that matter, healthier.
      Israel lives in a tough neighborhood
      So tough in fact, that her neighbors have threatened to eradicate/eliminate her if they can.
      So Israel develops an arms industry to defend herself.
      And to prevent any arms embargoes against Israel from succeeding.
      And now as a result of these pressure, Israel has produced one of the most advanced arms industries in the world.
      If the World does not want Israel to continue inventing the “Iron Domes” and other specialized DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT, get them to force the Palestinians to negotiate in good faith.
      And the calling for the “right of return of the refugees” is not negotiating in good faith.
      Israel cannot and will not negotiate its own demise.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Boxthorn

      If more countries in the beginning of Israel’s existence hadn’t refused to send Israel arms this might not have happened.

      Once again boycotts of Israel only cause death and destruction.

      Reply to Comment
    4. John Gilberts

      Here in Canada, this disgusting business of death is now facilitated by our new Israeli resident Defence Attache, Brig-Gen Eden Attias. Attias, formerly Commander of IAFB Nevatin, was cited by Turkish intelligence for his role in the Mavi Marmara incident. He was also named as one of ‘dirty 200’ list of Gaza ‘Cast Lead’ war criminals. Of course it’s Canada, so nobody is complaining or even mentioning it, even those that should be. Meanwhile the awful arms trade he helps facilitate continues.

      Reply to Comment
      • rsgengland

        Talking of Turkey is a very interesting idea.
        Lets look at Turkeys war against the Kurds in the East; the amount of dead in this dirty little war; the attacking of Kurds in Iraq; the suppression and lack of freedom for the Kurds in Turkey.
        Then there is North Cyprus; the attack and illegal occupation of the norther part of the island in the 1970s’.
        And also the suppression of the recent popular protests in the cities of Turkey.
        And whose is the “dirty 200 list” you mention?
        Is it from the Islamist controlled government of Turkey perchance?
        And who has designated a war criminals list from Cast Lead?
        And does it also include Palestinians for the war crime of deliberately targeting Israeli civilians with rockets fired from within civilian areas [using the local population as human shields]?

        Reply to Comment