+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Druze draft refuser sent to Israeli military prison, put in solitary

Druze-Arab men, unlike other Arab citizens of Israel, are subject to the same mandatory conscription as Jewish Israelis. Kamal Zidan is refusing because of his Palestinian identity.

Kamal Zidan and his grandmother pose for a photo before he presented himself at the Israeli army induction base. (Courtesy of the Zidan family)

Kamal Zidan and his grandmother pose for a photo before he presented himself at the Israeli army induction base. (Courtesy of the Zidan family)

Kamal Zidan, an Arab-Druze citizen of Israel, presented himself at the Israeli army’s Tel HaShomer induction based last Sunday and declared that he refuses to be conscripted into the IDF. Zidan, whose refusal is based on his Palestinian identity, was sentenced on the spot to five days in military prison by an administrative tribunal.

Unlike Muslim and Christian Arab citizens of Israel, Druze men are subject to mandatory military conscription just like Jewish Israelis.

“The chances of getting exempt from service are not high, and he is expected to be jailed again,” said Yaman Zidan, Kamal’s lawyer and father. Other refusers have spent months in prison, sentenced to anywhere from a five to 30 days at a time.

Yaman, who has two brothers that died during their military service, is one of the founders of the Urfod Movement, which advocates for draft refusal among Druze citizens in Israel. Yaman himself refused to serve, and now, his son is following his footsteps.

During his week in military prison, Zidan says he was kept in harsh conditions, including being placed in solitary confinement. Upon his release, he was told to return to the induction base at the end of the Passover holiday next week.

“They put him in solitary confinement with surveillance cameras filming 24 hours a day, because he’s refusing all orders. He’s refusing to salute the officers and commanders that enter his cell,” said Yaman, the father.

“I’m not a soldier, so don’t treat me as one,” Kamal added.

The constant surveillance is a blatant violation of privacy, Kamal and his father said. Furthermore, Kamal described having to sleep on a bare mattress because no sheets were provided to him.

He said was allowed to bring only one book into the cell. During the day, he was forbidden from laying on the bed, he added, and the light in his cell was kept on throughout the night, which made it hard to fall asleep.

“If he lays on the bed, they go in and force him up. Once, they even took away his mattress as punishment. There was another case in which he was handcuffed for laying down. They want him to sit in the same position the whole day,” said Yaman. “There’s an element of physical and psychological pressure.”

According to his father, Kamal went on a hunger strike, in solidarity with Palestinian prisoners who were also on hunger strike last week. Even after the prisoners ended their strike, he refused to eat, in protest of his conditions, said Yaman.

“I spoke with the officer, and he said he was following protocol. I asked him to see those protocols, but he refused to show me,” Yaman said.

Last Thursday, Yaman filed a High Court petition against the Military Advocate and the State Attorney regarding his son’s conditions in prison, which he argues are harsher due to ethnic discrimination. Yaman also requested a copy of the army’s protocols regarding the type of treatment his son was subject to.

In response, the MAG said all prisoners are prohibited from lying on their beds during the day. In the same breath, the army denied that Kamal was forbidden from resting in his cell during the day.

“When they enter Kamal’s cell, they demand he place his hands behind his back. If he refuses to do so, he says, they handcuff him,” said Yaman.

According to the father, Kamal also said that various officers came into his cell in the first couple of days of his imprisonment and told him he is Druze, not Arab or Palestinian.

Kamal is basing his refusal to be drafted based on a clause that absolves Arab Druze from service based on an affinity to an Arab nationality.

“According to military law, men who are Arab Druze are defined as Druze, whereas women are defined as Arabs,” said Yaman. “Meaning, based on this law, I am a Druze son to an Arab mother! Do you get how absurd this is?”

After submitting his request for an exemption, Kamal arrived at the induction base on Sunday, where the tribunal investigated his claimed affinity.

“I think they were looking for an excuse to reject the affinity claim,” said Yaman. “If they had approved Kamal’s request for exemption based on that, it would have created a precedent.”

In 2014, the Israeli army imprisoned Druze refuser Omar Sa’ad for 150 days before ultimately releasing him from service. A year earlier, it imprisoned Jewish refuser Natan Blanc for 177 days in prison. In 2017, refuser Tamar Aloni spent 130 days in military prison before being released from service.

An Israeli military spokesperson sent the following response:

The soldier was tried in a disciplinary tribunal for refusing service, and was sentenced to five days of imprisonment. While serving his sentence in Prison 6, the soldier refused to follow the orders of the prison’s commanders, and was transferred to solitary confinement as a result. In contrast to the soldier’s claims, while incarcerated, the officers treated him in accordance with the law, and there is no basis to his claim that he was punished by being handcuffed. The soldier finished serving his sentence last week.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. jacob


      Reply to Comment
    2. Tommy Goldberg

      It’s well known that Jewish refusers refuse to follow military protocol while imprisoned. Are they subjected to solitary confinement and other harsh additional punishment as well?

      Reply to Comment
      • Bruce Gould

        The Prison Insider is a good source of information:


        Testimonies obtained by the Plateforme pour la Palestine NGO all report that torture is systematically used on Palestinian detainees, regardless of age or sex. They all used similar words to describe similar treatments and practices used against them. During their arrest, detainees are bound with plastic ties that cut into their skin. When they are taken to the arrest site at the interrogation centre, the detainees are often beaten by the police or military from the Israeli Security Agency.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Lewis from Afula

      “Fakestinyanism” clearly represents a nasty detrimental ideology, which brings violence, chaos, depression & terror wherever and whenever it goes.

      This delusional fake peoplehood was not fabricated for nothing. Back in the 1960s, when the KGB started to fund that Egyptian mass murderer (Arafat) and gave him the “missing nation” story, they clearly knew what they were doing. Although the KGB & USSR no longer exist, their creation continues to enmiserate wherever it raises its ugly fascist head.

      Reply to Comment
      • Bruce Gould

        @Lewis: Correct me if I’m wrong, but when the American colonists in the 18th century declared their independence from Britain they didn’t claim to be recreating V 2.0 of a previously existing country (“When in the course of human events it becomes necessary to upgrade…”).

        No, they gave a human rights argument. In my opinion, the human rights argument is the proper justification for a Fakestinian state, not all the crazy history stuff.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          The JORDANIANS in Yesha started their 1st PLO flag-waving demonstrations in 1972.
          Thus, Fakestinyanism was NOT a revolt against JORDAN since JORDAN was no longer there.
          CONCLUSION – Your American Colonists Analogy is BS.

          No. The Namechanging was an attempt to shift the blame, confuse the World and frame Israel as the GUILTY BASTARDS who started the war.

          Reply to Comment
      • Peter Dahu

        Lewis From Afula

        Have you met your daily hasbara quota yet?

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Not Yet.
          I still want Bruce to admit that his American Colonists analogy is rather off – to say the least

          Reply to Comment
          • Bruce Gould

            @Lewis: Apartheid may be a better analogy.
            Israel is a human rights swamp.

            Reply to Comment
    4. Ben

      So this is what they do to the Druze. Even to “our blood brothers the Druze.” And in Israel the draftable Druze men are Druze but the women are “Arab.” We see.

      You think his treatment and the way it differs from treatment of Jewish refuseniks won’t send a message the Druze can read very well? Along with all the other messages they get?

      I mean, so what if he gets subjected to rough treatments that Jewish refuseniks are spared? Didn’t you get the memo? The nation state law makes all Israelis equal but some Israelis more equal than others.
      Sarcasm aside, the nation state law only formalizes and makes ‘legally sustainable’ what in practice happens routinely behind the facade of pro forma “equal rights”: pervasive unofficial discrimination against non-Jews.

      Note the attempts to blandly cover it up and deny and slip away from the truth, with intentionally boring, Orwellian non-statements, the same kind of intentionally boring non-statements described here:

      Look at the Photos, Netanyahu
      “…Not a single word of the army spokesman’s description manages to attract the reader’s attention. From the standpoint of Israelis, it’s just another routine day in the occupied territories. But the photographs of this incident cannot be met with apathy….”

      About the gross discrimination of the nation state law the right wing says: “Oh don’t be silly we don’t mean THAT.” But they do mean it. They do. Only a freier believes otherwise; or someone who thinks Jews are somehow different, a special case, uniquely better than all other human beings in history in being fair and decent to those over whom they have absolute power. They aren’t. They have proven that for sure in the past fifty years but the American Founders could have told you this about human nature ahead of time. They knew better.

      They knew very well about humans such as ‘Lewis from Afula.’

      Reply to Comment