+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Despite promises, government falls short on housing goals

Although the tent protests of 2011 succeeded in changing the public discourse about housing, the country’s policies regarding availability, affordability, and recognition of Bedouin villages in the Negev have not changed.

By Gil Gan Mor

Housing protest on Rothschild Boulevard, Tel Aviv, 14 July, 2011 (Photo: Eyal Warshavsky)

Last month, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) published its annual report on the state of human rights in Israel and the Occupied Territories. The document reviews the events of the past year by focusing on the how the government’s policies have affected peoples’ civil, political, and economic rights.

The summer of 2011 will be remembered in Israel for the massive social protests that swept the country as tens of thousands of citizens moved into improvised tent cities and participated in demonstrations. The spark that lit the fire underneath these protests was the difficulty that so many Israelis face as they try to keep a roof over their heads. The government promised to respond boldly and address the issue of housing. Accordingly, ACRI’s 2012 report focuses on the right to housing, and reveals that the substantial changes sought by the public and promised by the government are still lacking.

Even under its narrowest definition, the right to housing includes a safety net for the most vulnerable members of the population in the form of public housing. In Israel, however, public housing is scant due to two decades of policy in which no new public housing units were added. Despite being supported by the Minister of Housing and 32 members of Knesset from across the political spectrum, proposed legislation seeking to allocate 5% of all new projects built on state lands to public housing was not supported by the government. Instead the government prefers to rely on rental allowances, a nearly unmanageable policy that puts the economically vulnerable at the mercy of the private market, while failing to ensure that the payments keep pace with real housing costs.

Severe poverty and homelessness are not the only threats that undermine the right to housing. Beyond the fact of a roof over one’s head, a family’s home must be physically safe, afford privacy, and be in an adequate condition befitting modern society. Adequate housing must take into account a human being’s other basic needs, and be affordable enough to ensure these needs are not compromised. No one should be forced to deny their children dental care just to be able to pay the rent.

In this regard, the report shows that very little has been done to address the issue of affordability. In the face of increasing prices for housing, the government failed to heed one of the protesters’ central requests – a requirement that all new building plans include a fair proportion of affordable housing. Additionally, despite the passage of a law authorizing special national housing committees to allocate state lands to affordable housing in designated plans, in the year and a half since the law’s passage, not a single plan for affordable housing has been advanced by the committees.

For housing to be adequate it must also incorporate legal security of possession and occupancy, be connected to adequate infrastructure, and be accessible to health-care services, schools and employment. In this regard, the report illustrates the fact that many Bedouin Arabs still suffer from acute distress due to the government’s refusal to officially recognize 35 historical villages in the Negev. Approximately 70,000 people – 65% of them children – live in unrecognized villages, many of them without basic services such as paved roads, running water or electricity, let alone schools or health clinics. These citizens are not only at constant risk of having their homes destroyed for lack of building permits, they are at the mercy of proposed legislation to implement the Prawer Plan, which would uproot about 40,000 people from their homes. Instead of recognizing the 35 villages by the same standards applied to the 112 Jewish villages in the Negev (kibbutzim and moshavim), the Prawer Plan seeks to forcibly move their residents to culturally inadequate towns among the poorest in the country.

The right to adequate housing is a key issue on the public agenda. Although the tent protests of 2011 succeeded in changing the public discourse about housing, the country’s laws and policies have not changed. The struggle to defend peoples’ right to housing – along with their other human rights – will continue after the coming national election. We hope to report positive developments in ACRI’s 2013 annual report.

Attorney Gil Gan Mor is the Director of the Right to Housing Program at the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI).

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Unequal stability of Jewish and Bedouin villages/community in the Negev violates the Israeli Declaration of Independence’s equality of political, civil, and social rights. There is no constitutional support for such policy.

      As to housing in Israel proper, the State’s indictment of the hapless founder of J14 for incitement to riot signals clearly that the populace will be told what its problems are.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Kolumn9

      The terms of reference are pretty damn vague. What precisely is ‘adequate conditions befitting modern society’ or ‘culturally inadequate’? Who judges what these mean and more importantly why should I as a taxpayer agree with them?

      As for the Bedouin.. They are being moved off land they are squatting on to what certainly qualifies as ‘adequate conditions befitting modern society’. The complaint of the new arrangements not being ‘culturally appropriate’ sounds like you wish for them to continue to live like savages in woefully inadequate housing conditions not befitting modern society.

      Reply to Comment

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter