+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Creeping censorship in a southern Israeli town

Verbal attacks by right-wing groups and politicians in Be’er Sheva are threatening both NGOs and the local university.

By Daniel Beller

A meeting at Multaqa-Mifgash, the only joint Arab-Jewish group operating in Be'er Sheva. (Negev Coexistence Forum)

A meeting at Multaqa-Mifgash, the only joint Arab-Jewish group operating in Be’er Sheva. (Negev Coexistence Forum)

Over the past year various entities, including right-wing movements, have been trying to close down a joint Jewish-Arab cultural institution in the southern Israeli town of Be’er Sheva. The Multaqa-Mifgash Center, founded by the Negev Coexistence Forum (NCF), operates out of a municipal bomb shelter and stages activities and events focused on coexistence. It’s a unique institution in Be’er Sheva, and — aside from Ben-Gurion University — is the only place in the city that holds discussions on fundamental, sensitive issues within the local community.

Actions taken against the NCF have included sabotaging attempts to host a panel discussion on conscientious objection featuring members of Breaking the Silence, as well as the screening of a Palestinian-Dutch film, which were canceled following threats from right-wing political activists and warning noises from the Be’er Sheva municipality.   

Furthermore, the municipality has previously tried to cancel a Multaqa-Mifgash film screening, prompting the council’s legal advisor — approached by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel — to spell out that banning political activities harms freedom of expression.

On May 11, 2017, the municipality sent the NCF a letter in which it claimed that the NGO had violated the contract under which it has been using the shelter to hold Multaqa-Mifgash events since 2006. A few days later, an Association for Civil Rights in Israel attorney, Dan Yakir, responded to the municipality and rejected its claims.

A few days later, on May 14, Be’er Sheva council member Ortal Perlman Shmueli announced that she and fellow city councilors from Shas, Yisrael Beitenu and LIkud would be seeking to ban the NCF from using the municipal shelter. Later on, Shmueli posted on Facebook that the “goal had been achieved” and that the organization had been removed from the shelter. The Be’er Sheva municipality stated afterwards that the only thing which had been requested was a clarification of the group’s activities.

NCF CEO Haia Noach explained that the shelter used by Multaqa-Mifgash “is the only one out of 60 assigned to NGOs that is used for shared Jewish-Arab activities… We demand that the municipality immediately step back from canceling the assignment of the shelter [to us], and we intend to fight with every tool we have in order to guarantee Multaqa-Mifgash’s can continue.”

Academics under threat

The NCF is not alone: on Wednesday, Jewish Home MK Bezalel Smotrich summoned an emergency debate in the Knesset’s Education Committee on Ben-Gurion University and its president, Professor Rivka Carmi. Smotrich claimed that the university supports BDS, pointing at a series of statements made by the academic staff and conferences he alleged had been held on its premises.

Jewish Home MK Bezalel Smotrich at a Knesset committee hearing, November 28, 2016. (Photo by Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Jewish Home MK Bezalel Smotrich at a Knesset committee hearing, November 28, 2016. (Photo by Miriam Alster/Flash90)

The debate featured a broad spectrum of participants, including representatives from the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, the Justice Ministry, Ben-Gurion University, the Council for Higher Education, the Anti-Defamation League, student organizations, and a range of different government departments, including the Prime Minister’s Office. Carmi, who received a tidal wave of criticism from Be’er Sheva residents, was forced to respond to the allegations thrown at her by Smotrich and members of far-right group Im Tirtzu. (It should be noted that the committee of university heads fiercely condemned Carmi’s summons to the hearing.)

“Ben-Gurion University seems, over the last few years, to have become a greenhouse for people who delegitimize the IDF and the State of Israel,” Smotrich wrote prior to the debate. “In particular, there is a growing discourse among faculty members against the State of Israel. Professor Neve Gordon, for example, said that ‘the most accurate way to describe Israel today is as an apartheid state.’ And Dr. Eyal Nir, who said: ‘I call on the world to come and break the necks of these bastards (right-wing activists).’”

Professor Carmi read out her response during the hearing. “The current debate — held under a baseless and degrading heading and accompanied by wild and violent online incitement against me — does no credit to its initiator,” she said. Carmi detailed contributions by the university and its faculty to the fight against the boycott of Israel, and described hers and her staff’s appearances in support of Israel at international forums. The hearing occasionally resembled those of the McCarthy era.

This is the third year in a row of attempts to attack the university in the same week as the meeting of its board of governors. Time and again futile claims are made and rehashed that have no relation to facts, reality, or truth. The same few academic staff who have expressed individual political opinions and signed petitions — as is appropriate in a democratic state — are, again and again, singled out from a faculty of over 850. They are not doing so in the name of the university, which is a pluralistic institution with many different opinions just like any other organization in Israel — and the world.

Daniel Beller is a journalist, blogger and radio broadcaster based in Be’er Sheva. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call, where he is a blogger.

Donate banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      The municipality and the Israeli taxpayers have the right to know whether the law, public order and the security of the State are respected. It is the same world wide.

      Reply to Comment
      • Joshua Fisher

        You fascists have no right at all to know what your political opponent does. You’re just clowns.

        Reply to Comment
        • Itshak Gordin Halevy

          The tolerance is not your key point.. However we are here at home and we do what we want in the interest of our country by respecting the laws.

          Reply to Comment
        • Ben

          People assume that Moshe Feiglin is some inconsequential figure, no longer in the Knesset. But in fact, even though Israelis like to say that Feiglin is not in power, he is only not in power because he was at once too clumsy, too blunt, and too articulate about what he really means, not smooth and double-talking enough. The spirit of Feiglin is metastasizing and taking over Israel by shifting into new forms. Bezalel Smotrich is its poster child. And Bezalel Smotrich says what others, others who are smoother and less honest, more conniving, notably Naftali Bennett, couch in palatable euphemisms. But they are all really on the same page in the textbooks of political science. They are Feiglinist “popular democrats” (in the fascist branch of the political evolutionary tree).

          If you listen closely to what the comments of five or six right wing commenters here routinely say, it is clear they at bottom, essentially, think like Feiglin, Smotrich, and Bennett. Halevy’s comment hear perfectly illustrates that.

          “we are here at home and we do what we want in the interest of our country”

          Halevy seems not to realize that the German National Socialists passed plenty of laws and abided by them.

          Reply to Comment