+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Following protest, bank freezes support for anti-democratic group

Im Tirtzu, the nasty little organization that has ushered in some of the more dangerous trends in Israel – policing academic thought, turning Zionism into a sort of raison d’état – has suffered a powerful blow issued with swift and impressive precision by an apparently lethal force: consumers.

Bank Leumi, one of the country’s oldest banks, was forced to freeze a new charity program on Sunday when customers discovered that money they raised could have gone to Im Tirtzu, along with other social welfare organizations.  It probably took the enterprising folks no more than a few minutes to check the rules of the program, before they quickly mounted a largely virtual protest.  Bank Leumi’s decision to reassess the program came in a matter of days.

The campaign was called “Two million reasons” and the idea was to give away two million shekels to 60 philanthropic organizations. Political organizations were not allowed. About 140 groups were to post a short internet video about their group on the bank’s website, and consumers would “vote” – and funds would be distributed in descending order of popularity. A worthy cause.

But Im Tirtzu (literally, “If you will it” – half of Herzl’s “If you will it, it is no dream”) of course, is an exclusively political organization that has no social welfare aspect whatsoever, except for domination of the minds of Israelis and the extinction of free, independent and critical thought.

And so consumers, apparently, revived a little of the old cottage cheese spirit. In a flash, various campaigns were set up on social networking sites: “two million good reasons to leave Bank Leumi,” appeared on FB, where I also found one called “two million reasons to hate Bank Leumi,” which I avoided, since I don’t approve of hate; another FB page stated cheekily, “If you will it, they can cancel your transaction fees!”  I was particularly pleased when Haaretz reported (Hebrew, in the headline) that both right and left-wing protesters mounted the boycott (although the article gave no examples of right wingers, while it did point out the active participation of Yariv Oppenheimer from Peace Now). The bank’s regular Facebook page filled up with comments, and when I checked yesterday, the bank’s site administrators were desperately trying to provide soothing responses: “we’re listening to our customers…” and the like.

After calling, but failing, to reach my Leumi branch manager on Thursday, I found the easiest and most efficient tool to be a link sent by a friend on Facebook with a petition stating that Bank Leumi is free to do what it wants with its money, but that if a single shekel of mine goes to this fear-and-hate spewing organization, I will close my account and transfer my funds to another bank. I signed my name, wrote my bank branch number, and off it went. As of today, there are 2,918 others who signed. It’s not a huge number, but hey – now that the summer social protests over, I’m no longer embarrassed to announce that I am not in overdraft and apparently Leumi isn’t ready to let our cash go.

Not to overstate the case, but this is the first time that Israel’s newfound civic-consumer muscle has been put to use for an overtly political cause that involves standing up to protect Israeli society from its dangerous anti-democratic elements. I wish this would be a turning point.

For the record, I do not deny the right of any group to speak out. I am far more repelled by Im Tirtzu than by any typical right-wing group with whom I disagree – because its main mission is to cut off the oxygen to the Israeli mind and impose its dictatorial, supremacist vision of “Zionism” on everyone. I’m against overuse of the term fascism, but if anyone comes close, it’s them.

Still, I wouldn’t advocate outlawing or shutting down Im Tirtzu. Actually, I get much more pleasure watching the people of this country who still believe in a sane, salvageable society, taking such immediate action and winning this battle with our own hands. My pleasure is surely magnified by seeing us hold a bank by the…well, I’ll leave it at that.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. AMIR.BK

      I think that the title is a bit misleading, first, Im Tirzu will still get 10,000 NIS from Leumi for their ‘participation’, and second, like you state your article, the entire event was cancelled not only Im Tirzu’s participation.
      This of course allows Im Tirzu and their masters in the Israeli government to create a beautiful spin, whose effects can already be seen echoing through the Israeli social-network sphere. Instead of portraying this as a consumer boycott inspired by the participation of a political orginization in the ‘charity event’, it is portrayed as “Leftists gagging on Zionist expression” and of course “Leftist insistance -forces- Leumi to cancel its charitable activities”.
      Im Tirzu and their masters are very good at spinning lies and creating an alternative reality, I think that they might benefit more from how things turned out than from their prospective 2nd place winnings (about 100k nis).

      Reply to Comment
    2. Why was Im Tirzu on the list at all? Has the bank denied that it made a mistake? Do they assert it a “charitable” organization, perhaps in the nebulous area of “education?” I would guess that someone(s) in the bank hierarchy knows some Im Tirzu, so their presence reflects network connections.
      Internet mobilization is strange. One can “act” by just pressing a button; or one can act by physically limiting other options for oneself (as in the Egyptian rebellion and Syria, or the J14 tenters early on). Since this was a PR campaign, I would guess that some in the bank’s culture did not think it unwise to include the group; so the group’s presence on the list is a point sample of elite expectation. Somebody focusing on internet PR should have warned them of the biteback–but no one thought to ask (?)
      My hope is that most people don’t care about these countercharges. Why exactly is the left dangerous for most Israelis? It’s really not. The pull of the right may be to charge that Leftists, by existing openly, are hurting the economy. Boycotts, defamation, NGO’s. One needs an economic reply, that somehow resonantes with their budgets.

      Reply to Comment