+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Colonialism's latest victim

The Palestinian man killed in Kafr Qasim this week was just the latest casualty of a colonial system whose masters feel forever threatened by the natives they rule over.

By Marzuq Al-Halabi

Mahmoud Mahmoud Salim Taha, who was shot and killed by a security guard in Kafr Qasem, June 5, 2017.

Mahmoud Mahmoud Salim Taha, who was shot and killed by a security guard in Kafr Qasem, June 5, 2017.

The killing of a Palestinian man in Kafr Qasim by an Israeli security guard earlier this week was more than just a regrettable incident that raised questions about police conduct. It was also a near-exact repetition of other such episodes in which the victim was Palestinian and the killer a member of the security forces.

Fifty-two young Arab citizens have been shot dead by Israeli security forces since October 2000. They are classified in legal terms as separate cases, each assessed on its own merits, but they’re not. These killings are part of an ongoing phenomenon — a creeping process that has resulted not from the conduct of native Palestinian Arabs, but from the structural relations between them and Jewish society, which adopted a colonialist approach toward the native Arab population in the region.

Official spokespersons in Israel tell us that the killings of Muhammad Taha in Kfar Qasim, of Yaqoub Abu al-Qi’an in Umm al-Hiran, and of many others besides, resulted from security forces feeling that their lives were in danger and therefore they had no choice but to kill them. This story is invariably helped along by a fawning media and other advocates. And added to it will be the Kafr Qasim security guard’s defense attorney’s claim: “If the security guard hadn’t opened fire, he probably wouldn’t be alive now!”

When the master feels threatened

These classic colonial power relations, which are developing anew around us, always assert themselves as a paradigm in which the Jewish “master” feels endlessly feels threatened by any movement, utterance, gathering, singing or shouting by the natives.

This sense of threat invariably turns lethal when the friction between the native and the ruler becomes a reality, such as during home demolitions, crowd dispersal — even for gatherings with a permit — and so on. Every member of the Israeli security forces and every police unit is equipped with the most sophisticated military technology, which is particularly conspicuous to the Arab Palestinian public.

It’s no stretch to say that this army gear is intended to oppress those very natives who are the source of this constant threat, especially if they don’t acquiesce to the aggressive and provocative actions of a police officer who feels like a God compared to them. The assumption is that they must surrender and obey, without so much as a peep.

Family and friends carry the body of Muhammad Taha during his funeral ceremony in Kfar Qasim in central Israel, June 6, 2017. (Flash90)

Family and friends carry the body of Muhammad Taha during his funeral ceremony in Kfar Qasim in central Israel, June 6, 2017. (Flash90)

This threat can always be “neutralized” (read: killed) by frightened people with sophisticated weapons, even if they are supposed to be maintaining their longed-for security.

In a colonial situation, the rulers will always try to subordinate the natives to “their” agenda. Otherwise, as per the existential, security-oriented colonial worldview, those same natives will believe them weak and cowardly. As such, the ruler has to deter the natives by applying force every now and then in order to exact further casualties among the natives.

Sadly, this perception is programmed into the entire ruling apparatus, along with most of the media and the public. Every time another killing occurs, officials in various roles use the same hollow words, and the media recycles these sentences under the guise of neutrality — while actually whitewashing loaded terms. Meanwhile, the shooters among the Israeli forces are rewarded with total silence from the judicial system.

This is why investigations into killings by security forces are always closed — not because there’s no guilty party, but because they have been helped along by a system whose purpose is to guarantee control over the natives, who themselves can be accused of anything. In the age of “fake news,” the ruling establishment and journalists carry out this task gladly, and even with a sense of mission.

The mental, legal and governmental structures created by colonialism generate endless day-to-day practicalities. It creates a walled-off discourse in which every statement is known in advance, and in which people drunk on power and a sense of their own dominance nonetheless feel constantly threatened and afraid. And all the while they are faced by people who have been robbed of human dignity, dead, sprawled in their own blood.

I am well aware that there are relatively broad circles trying to free Israel from the grip of the colonialist mindset, while working towards an agreement and coexistence in the region. But what is there to be done, when Israel’s current mode of rule is in keeping with British colonial practices in India, and France’s in Senegal? The government and its various arms have created this reality through consistent, planned and malicious policy, and there is no choice left to us now but to call it by its name.

There are terrible days yet ahead of us. The killing in Kfar Qasim was not the last of its kind, even if we wish to ourselves that it were. Whoever wants to live in this place must turn their efforts toward building a life, and not toward destruction and killing.

Marzuq Al-Halabi is a jurist, journalist, author. He writes regularly for Al-Hayat. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call.

Donate banner

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Firentis

      Blah blah blah. A mob of youth attacked a police station. One of them got shot. Don’t attack the police and you won’t get shot. It is pretty simple. It is also rather ironic that at the same time as the police are attacked there are protests in Kafr Qassem demanding that the police do more to enforce the law and complaints.

      The rest of the article is just a failed attempt at using the post-colonialist discourse to attract sympathy. If you see the police and the state as the enemy, which according to the article you do, you should expect the police to see you as a threat.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Hey here’s an idea. Why don’t you take the 20% of wages you are, out of pure racism and in violation of the Torah, viciously docking refugees, and take those shekels and dedicate it to providing the law enforcement services you steadfastly refuse to provide Arab citizens simply because they’re not Jews. There’s an idea. It’s got a perverse circular logic to it but you have to start somewhere. And why inconvenience the Israeli taxpayer when you can screw over black African refugees instead? It’s a win-win.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Brian G

      After centuries of oppression and killing of Jewish citizens,the western Powers decided that they needed a public act of contrition, so they agreed to set up a country for European Jewish people. In 1948 England donated one of its colonies, Palestine, to the UN to be divided up between the indigenous Palestinians and the European Jewish immigrants.
      The Zionist government of Israel took over more and more Palestinian and Bedouin town and farmlands and brought in more civilized European Jewish immigrants to fill the “empty” lands and villages.
      The European powers saw nothing wrong with this as it was the same policies that they had used in their colonial expansion around the world for centuries. Most of the English and Spanish speaking countries around the world were established at the expense of Indigenous populations by ” civilized ” European immigrants taking over the lands and resources.
      Jewish citizens were abused for centuries but that is no excuse for the Zionist government to be the abusers now.

      Reply to Comment