+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Can a play about the occupation find a home with American Jews?

Famed Israeli playwright Joshua Sobol couldn’t get Israeli theaters to produce his latest play, ‘The Last Act.’ So he took it to Boston, where American Jewish audiences are finding it no less difficult to digest. Sobol and Israeli-American director Guy Ben-Aharon discuss the backlash, the clampdown on criticism of Israel, and whether an American audience is more willing to engage with portrayals of the occupation.

By Marcelo Svirsky

Israeli playwright Joshua Sobol (left) and Israeli director Guy Ben-Aharon. (Justin Saglio/Israeli Stage)

Israeli playwright Joshua Sobol (left) and Israeli director Guy Ben-Aharon. (Justin Saglio/Israeli Stage)

Joshua Sobol is the most famous living Israeli playwrights. Known for controversial work that challenges the dominant narrative in the country, Sobol has written over 75 plays, which have been translated and performed in over 25 countries.

Two years ago Sobol wrote a political thriller titled “The Last Act.” Despite being one of Israel’s most well-known artists, Sobol couldn’t find a home for the play in Israeli theater houses due to the gravity of its subject matter: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Instead, it was Boston’s “Israeli Stage,” a production company that has put on more than 30 staged readings and productions of Israeli plays since 2010, which premiered the play.

Directed by Guy Ben-Aharon, an Israeli who moved to Massachusetts as a child, “The Last Act” is set in present day Israel and tells the story of an Israeli Jewish actress, Gilly, and a Palestinian actor, Djul, who are cast in an adaptation of a 19th-century August Strindberg play, “Miss Julie.” Gilly’s husband Ethan is a Mossad agent and he and his boss believe Djul is pretending to be an actor, but is in fact a Hamas operative trying to kidnap Gilly in order to exchange her for Palestinian prisoners.

I interviewed Sobol and Ben-Aharon to discuss the backlash against the play, the clampdown on criticism of Israel, and whether the American audience is more willing to engage with portrayals of the occupation.

No theater in Israel agreed to stage “The Last Act.” Does that mean that under today’s circumstances, criticism of Israel needs to be taken abroad in order to be heard?    

Sobol: It is the artistic policy of our public theaters that has changed during the last 20 or 30 years. Much of the repertoire of Israeli public theaters in the last three decades is full of revivals of old musicals that have absolutely nothing to do with the present, past, or future of the Israeli situation. The grim reality of the occupation and the oppression of the Palestinian population living under Israeli control has become an unsavory subject for the managements of our cultural institutions. When our minister of culture, Miri Regev, withdrew funding to Al-Midan Theater following the production of a play on the everyday life of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, none of our theaters darkened their stages in protest. Not one of our theater managers will admit to self-censorship.

The play is being staged, financed, and presented by Israeli Stage, a Jewish-American organization. To what extent can one embrace a true criticism of Israel’s policies in the U.S. and how it that received by your Jewish audience?   

Ben-Aharon: Our vision is to welcome all to the table at Israeli Stage. Israeli Stage was founded in 2010 as a means to share Israeli culture via theater; it is by no means targeted to or presented for a Jewish-American audience. As for the pluralism within the organization, I am continually surprised by and grateful for the fact that members of our board and council come from different spectrums of the political map – from Jewish Voice for Peace to AIPAC.

That said, over the years, and particularly now, we have had supporters and audience members express their concerns over plays dealing with the conflict – and subsequently, we’ve had supporters and audience members leave the company. It is disheartening that people are unable to deal with a point of view that is not their own.

In years past, when presenting plays that deal with the conflict we would receive concerned emails. I would reply with messages reiterating our commitment to dialogue and asking them to join us for a meaningful experience. Many ended up taking me up on the offer, attending the various plays. And while they didn’t share the same points of view of the various playwrights, they were open to engaging with the work. I am afraid we’ve entered a new territory of division these days. Our society is unwilling to be in the same room with a voice that is different than theirs. It’s a product of the polarization of our world, with everyone living in his or her own bubble, and it’s a product of the increasingly right-wing regime in Israel, which has continued to ask Americans to embrace an “Israel right or wrong” approach.

What we’re seeing now is unprecedented. We’ve received emails saying Joshua Sobol doesn’t deserve a stage. One email said Sobol “should stay in the realm of art and theater…not expressing his views in the political arena.” Another, expressing anger, said, “Israeli Stage is asking their audience to come see a show highlighting…a negative reflection of Israel.”

The play focuses on what seems to be a romantic relationship between an Israeli woman and a Palestinian man, one that is under surveillance and manipulated by the Israeli security services. Is the message that the Jewish state is about making any and all social relations with Palestinians an historical impossibility, while erasing humanity of Palestinian people?

Sobol: There is no romantic relationship between Gilly and Djul — theirs is a a purely professional relationship. The security services misinterpret their artistic work as a plot to kidnap an Israeli Jew in order to bargain for the release of Palestinian prisoners. My message is not that the Israeli state is making all relationships with Palestinians impossible. There are actually many working relationships that are flourishing in the fields of medicine, tech, law, filmmaking, and education. If there is any central message, it is that the ongoing conflict risks to destroy those human relationships due to the sickening atmosphere of mutual suspicion that is poisoning our life.

In the play, Djul says to Gilly, “We have to be in a place and a situation where we will be equal to one another. Where we can begin to talk love.” It seems that the togetherness lost a century ago, when Zionism first came to the country, can only be recreated elsewhere — in another place and in another time. Was it the impossibility of coexistence that you wanted to stage? Are there any other circumstances today that can bring Palestinians and Israelis together? 

Sobol: Zionism has nothing to do with the present situation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Zionism had been a movement that tried to convince European Jews that their physical existence was under threat due to the rising European anti-Semitism, and that the only way to save their lives would be to to return to Eretz Israel, and to establish a Hebrew State capable of defending the life of Jews against genocide.



This project had never called for a war with the Arab population living between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. The fact that at the present day there are some six million Jews and a similar number of Arabs living in the historical Land of Israel, and that there is still enough room for doubling the population of the country, is the best evidence that there was no reason, no need, and no justification to reject the UN 1947 Partition of the country, except for a political refusal to accept a peaceful co-existence of the two peoples.

The use of the term Zionism nowadays to justify the occupation of the West Bank, or the use of the term to vilify the very foundation of the state of Israel, are both an expression of political bad faith.

A scene from Joshua Sobol's play, 'The Last Act.' (Paul Marotta/Israeli Stage)

A scene from Joshua Sobol’s play, ‘The Last Act.’ (Paul Marotta/Israeli Stage)

Ben-Aharon: My mother is involved in an organization called “The Road to Recovery.” The mission of the organization is to drive Palestinian patients between checkpoints to hospitals in Israel. These are Palestinians mostly living in Zone A and B; whose permits only allow them to travel to and from the hospital. My mother can spend up to four hours a day driving Palestinian children, women, and men so that they can get better. I am continually amazed by this beautiful act of empathy. Most of the time we drive those whom we love to and from hospitals, and here’s an organization that’s creating that relationship between two strangers, between people who are pitted against each other by their politicians.

My mother is a Zionist. She believes that there’s a need for a Jewish state. She’s the daughter of two survivors whose parents and siblings were brutally murdered during the Holocaust. At the same time, she recognizes the need for a Palestinian state and does what she can to help further that cause by instilling faith in her Israeli and Palestinian friends – showing them that acts of compassion, empathy, and giving are possible at moments of deep division.

Do you believe it would be significant to bring the play to young Jewish audiences in the states, say, in high schools and universities? Do you expect much opposition from institutions in the Jewish community? 

Ben-Aharon: We haven’t been condemned by anyone – yet. Let’s see what happens. It’s still early.

A few years ago, the President of the Combined Jewish Philanthropies led a dialogue following a showing of the play “Ulysses on Bottles,” which deals with Gaza. He said that Israel needed a lawyer to represent it in the play, and took a few minutes to talk about his concern for Israel’s security. But he engaged.

Marcelo Svirsky is an academic based in Australia.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Lewis from Afula

      Leftist American Jews ?
      Who cares ?
      In another generation, these idiots will be gone – assimilitated into nothingness

      Reply to Comment
      • Hello

        Hi Lewis – Among America’s strong right supporters of Israel’s fight for survival, who would you say are the most notable and helpful?

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Leftist American Jews are not helpful at all for Israel. These idiots supported that tosspot called Hussein Obama and his crappy administration.

          Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Not everyone pays a Communist Newspaper in order to have the privledge of read up its Pravda-style nonsense.

          Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Bennet’s a “communist spouting Pravda-style nonsense”? Who knew? I had thought he was a promenading neofascist spouting Volkisch nonsense.

            Reply to Comment
          • Lewis from Afula

            Well, that’s because your totally confused about Israel’s history. You believe the nasty distorted quotes of 3 Israeli politicans made YEARS AFTER the 6 day war and disbelieve the open declarations of Arab Leaders made in May 1967.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Nothing distorted about them. And ‘David’ definitively put your distortions to rest over on that page. Thanks for allowing him and me to set the record straight.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            @Lewis from Afula: Fairly high probability you’re in that crowd pictured at the top of this article about the assertive racists of Afula. If so, would you please point out your personage for us?

            To the Israelis inside and outside of Afula reading this, do you still want to argue you are not an exceptionally racism-troubled country, stuck at best where the USA was in the early 1950s with respect to racism, and where the USA was in, oh, the early 1800s with respect to colonialism? Reminder: It’s 2018 and you claim the bona fides to chum around with Western Europe and the USA with regard to democracy and human rights. The only democracy blah blah blah and all that.
            Who are you kidding?

            Reply to Comment
          • Lewis from Afula

            This is what the Fakestinyan / South Syrian / Jordanian leader said in the 6 day war:

            “Kill the Jews wherever you find them. Kill them with your arms, with your hands, with your nails and teeth.”
            King Hussein, Radio Amman, June 6, 1967

            Ben: But you know this stuff was debunked 20 years later because Gideon Levy, Ilan Papper or another comrade of yours said so.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            This is what the Mayor of Afula said in June 2018: “The residents of Afula don’t want a mixed city, but rather a Jewish city, and it’s their right.” And is proceeding to deny the sale of a house to an Arab Israeli family.

            In Netanyahu’s Israel the vision of a national home for the Jewish people is transmogrified into an ultranationalist project of Jewish supremacy.

            Read it. Every word. It’s about you. ==>

            Ignoring Racism in Afula
            Netanyahu and his fellow cabinet members promote racist laws whose sole purpose is to give this superiority the force of law

            Reply to Comment
          • Lewis from Afula

            Ben – still trying to change the subject ???
            The militant, openly genocidal declarations made by the Arab Leaders just before the 6 day war is TOO MUCH for cuckoo Marxists like yourself to explain away.

            Reply to Comment
          • Ben

            Can’t handle the news report from Afula on the blatant racism underlying all your politics, can you Lewis? Are you one of those agitators in the photo at the top of the article, or did you do sign up for a different shift?

            Reply to Comment
      • john

        under the pretense that ‘assimilated’ jewish women won’t have jewish babies, the antisemite from afula dismisses all nonisraeli jews who won’t worship his state appropriately. it’s not surprising other israelis don’t want to deal with this racist crap.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Assimilated American Jewish Women do not have babies.
          By the time, they have built their great Independent careers, they are old maids – that’s 3rd wave feminism for you. Then, there are those that have babies but are intermarried.
          I believe in a recent survey, only some 16% of Reform, Conservative or Unaffiliated US Jews are in-married and have babies.

          The whole thing is undergoing total implosion.

          Reply to Comment
          • john

            right, because addressing your own antisemitism would require critical thought. your focus on women as reproductive automatons is creepy as well.

            Reply to Comment
          • Lewis from Afula

            Yes, everyone needs to listen to John.
            All women round the World must stop having kids.
            In another century or so, the human race will no around.
            WELL DONE, John.

            Reply to Comment
    2. Sheldon Ranz

      It would be helpful to know if the Israeli Stage group gets money from any Israeli cultural or academic institutions. If it does, then as a BDS participant, I would not attend Sobol’s play, no matter how good it is.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Joe Schwammberger

      Israelis don’t deserve to watch this play. Alice Walker, a great critic of the Zionist entity, will not translate her works into Hebrew, because it is a language of raycists. Similarly, Palestinians should not go to Zionist hospitals, because it helps Zionist propaganda. Have the play staged in Palestine instead, free of charge

      Reply to Comment
    4. Click here to load previous comments

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter