+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Calling Bibi's bluff: Why Israel depends on a liberal, open Europe

Netanyahu can bash the EU all he wants. At the end of the day, the future and security of Israel depends on its political and economic ties with the EU, not vice versa.

By Eitay Mack (translated from Hebrew by Ofer Neiman)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Reuven Rivlin, and Supreme Court President Miriam Naor, seen during a ceremony marking at the 74th anniversary of the death of Ze'ev Zabutinsky, on July 23, 2017. (Hadas Parush/Flash90)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Reuven Rivlin, and Supreme Court President Miriam Naor, seen during a ceremony marking at the 74th anniversary of the death of Ze’ev Zabutinsky, on July 23, 2017. (Hadas Parush/Flash90)

Last Wednesday, the media leaked a recording of a private conversation between Netanyahu and the heads of state of Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. In that conversation, Israel’s prime minister portrayed the European Union as a madman who puts its own future and security at risk. According to Netanyahu, the EU’s madness stems from its refusal to keep silent on the occupation of Palestinian territories, leaving him to wonder how the EU has not realized what politicians in India, China and Africa have already realized: security exports from Israel supersede anything else, and therefore one must refrain from intervening in Israel’s internal affairs.

The leak was likely an accident, but the timing of the conversation was not. Netanyahu smells the EU’s blood, as the latter is preoccupied with stopping the populist right-wing surge across the continent, as well as dealing with identity and economic crises, Brexit, refugees and immigration. While Trump flanks the EU from the West, Netanyahu has decided to do the same from the East, along with heads of state in Eastern Europe, who are also in the midst of a democratic crisis. Since the Trump administration has made it clear it is not be interested in human rights, the only thing keeping Netanyahu from the Promised Land are those pesky folks in Brussels.

Ending the masquerade

Netanyahu’s attempt to rein in the EU is not new. While Israeli governments have always tried to get by during votes in international forums by enlisting the support of democratic Western countries (support that Israel labels “the moral majority”), in reality the State of Israel has for decades been relying on the support of non-democratic states who receive arms in return for favorable votes. These regimes include the military juntas in Latin America and the apartheid regime in South Africa in the 1970s and 1980s. With the end of the Cold War and the signing of the Oslo Accords in the early 1990s, Israel renewed diplomatic relations with many states, after they were severed following the 1967 and 1973 wars. Many states no longer feared voting in favor of Israel, and the Israeli method of selling arms in return for votes at international forums had expanded to new parts of Asia and Africa.

Netanyahu has taken this method one step forward, not only by expanding it to additional countries, but also by establishing a strategy of breaking the automatic pro-Palestinian majority at international forums, while publicizing the “vote in exchange for arms” relationship. Among other things, Netanyahu has invested efforts in persuading African states to add Israel to the African Union Organization. The dictatorships in Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea, as well as impoverished Togo, have suddenly become Israel’s strategic partners. Similarly, in recent years, security deals have been signed with the Burmese junta, the repressive regime in Honduras, and the violent, corrupt government of Papua New Guinea.

Netanyahu’s statement at the meeting with Eastern European heads of state is no less grave than his attempts to buy votes at international forums in return for arms. The prime minister has essentially given his backing to non-democratic processes in Eastern Europe in order to weaken the leadership of Western European states in the EU.

There is no dispute that the EU, since the signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, is far from innocent. Its support for human rights is not uniform, and is affected by political and economic considerations. The EU issues weak criticism of grave human rights violations in China and Turkey, and cuts Israel a great deal of slack. One cannot sweep the support of some EU states for neo-colonial regimes — which take part in U.S.-initiated wars and maintain ties with dictatorial regimes throughout the world (such as the Gulf states) for business reasons — under the rug.

However, the EU, especially its Western European states, has also promoted a liberal democratic world order of human rights and peaceful conflict resolution. In many places across the world, it provides political and economic support for the promotion of human rights, it aids in building and protecting a civil society that may bring about a democratic change, helps build an independent judiciary system and health services, saves civilian lives, and prevents atrocities. No wonder so many people across the world are happy to receive a European passport or European asylum. Netanyahu, along with the tyrants and dictators of the world, repeatedly denounces the EU’s intervention in his internal affairs.

Netanyahu’s bluff

Netanyahu regards himself as a great statesman with a broad historical outlook. But from the leaked conversation emerges a portrait of a narrow-minded leader who only sees his voters in an outpost on a remote hill in the West Bank, and cannot grasp the dramatic significance of the weakening of liberal and democratic forces in Europe. Xenophobia and Islamophobia in Europe, which Netanyahu promotes, also pose a threat to Jewish communities there. Europe’s transformation into a nationalist, closed, and isolated region, and its unwillingness to intervene globally to prevent violations of international law and human rights, may put an end to criticism of Israel and Netanyahu. But it may also exacerbate violent conflicts, the refugee crisis, and global terror. Netanyahu knows he’s bluffing.

The future and security of Israel depends on its political and economic ties with the EU, not vice versa. Had Netanyahu wanted to help in the resolution of the global migration and refugee crisis, he should have prevented Israeli arms exports to regions plagued by civil wars and crimes against humanity, or to kleptocracies whose citizens suffer from hunger, unemployment and the lack of minimal infrastructure.

Eitay Mack is an Israeli human rights lawyer and activist, who is active for increased transparency and public scrutiny of Israeli security exports. This this article first appeared in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Firentis

      You almost make it sound like “Europe” is crusading around the world fighting against dictators, spreading democracy and preventing refugee crises from taking place. It isn’t. That was America before Trump and Obama.

      “Europe”, or rather several nosy Western European countries, are sitting at home and spending money abroad on whatever is currently in fashion in liberal/leftist circles, with the perennial benefactor being anyone that is trying to undermine the existence of Israel.

      People are happy to receive a European passport because “Europe” is a relatively stable and prosperous region. That has absolutely nothing to do with the foreign policy of prominent European countries. If anything in recent years they have managed to shoot themselves in the foot by supporting anti-Western forces abroad while providing shelter to large groups of people whose benefit to European countries’ political and economic well-being is questionable at best.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Lewis from Afula

      The EU is a dead man walking. Each day, thousands of muslim migrants reach the shores of Sicilly, further undermining the demographically-doomed project. Elections in Italy must happen within the next 10 months and the 5 star movement is leading the polls. When Italy leaves the EU, the whole giant circus of non-elected bureaucrats will enter the dustbin of history.

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        And you all were prattling on like that about France and Le Pen before France handed Le Pen a resounding defeat and Macron a victory.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          Ben, history does not end in 2017. There will be elections again in France in 2022. By then, Islam will even be more of a problem than it is today. Actually, Le Pen got 34% of the vote – double from last time. Actually, I am not a strong supporter of Le Pen (because of her dubious position on Jews) but Islam will make all such thoughts inconsequential when Muslims form 25% of all French citizens in their 20s (prognosis for 2022).

          Reply to Comment
    3. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      Bibi is a great prime minister. He has launched very good relationships with Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe. He was right to say what he said. Most all Israeli agree with him.

      Reply to Comment
    4. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      The writer Eytan Mack is a fool. He suggest Israel to stop arms exports which bring our country billions of dollars… The Israeli left is sick…

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Halevy your morality boils down to “If it profits Israeli Jews’ coffers it’s good, screw everybody and everything else.” Just to remind you once again, this is the morality of gangsters. The occupation is organized crime.

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          End the occupation……………………by mass repatriating the Jordanians to the E. Bank.

          Reply to Comment
    5. Paranam Kid

      “Xenophobia and Islamophobia in Europe, which Netanyahu promotes, also pose a threat to Jewish communities there.”

      That threat is exactly what all israeli leaders, zionists, have always wanted, staterting with Ben-Gurion & Weizmann. The zionists thrive on antisemitism as that is the only way the can persuade Jews to move to israel, which many Jews otherwise would not want, let alone contemplate.

      Thus, apart from being a racist state, israel is an antisemitic state, discriminating against fellow Jews as well as against fellow Semites the Palestinians.

      Reply to Comment
    6. Anonymous

      Netanyahu was the only reason I got out of becoming a full-fledged Neo Nazi.

      Reply to Comment