+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Brutality is the only answer Israel has to Gaza's civil disobedience

It is impossible to know what will happen along the border with Gaza in the coming weeks. But one thing is certain: Israel will continue to respond with brutality and arrogance in the face of Palestinian nonviolent civil disobedience.

By Aviv Tatarsky

Palestinians youth collect tires to burn them during demonstrations in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, April 4, 2018. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Palestinians youth collect tires to burn them during demonstrations in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, April 4, 2018. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Anyone who wants to understand where Israel is heading in Gaza ought to think about Prime Minister Netanyahu’s recent behavior regarding African asylum seekers. Even better: let’s go back to when the Israeli government decided to place metal detectors at the entrance to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif last summer.

Despite the differences, these three struggles have a single common denominator: the state is trying to force its will, only to encounter civil disobedience and resistance.

The first assumption we must make is that, in this dynamic, the state is the one with the power. A single person, a group, or organizations will not be able to prevent the state from carrying out its plan. The enormous gap in power, combined with a cynical leadership that cares little for the fate of human beings — whether or not they are citizens — is what drives the Israeli government, time and time again, to make mistakes that stem from a misreading of reality. It starts with belligerence, continues with arrogance, and ends with buckling to pressure. In the meantime, Israeli leaders incite and poison public opinion. And of course, people die.

Between protest and resistance

The metal detectors at the entrance to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif led to an impressive wave of civil disobedience. The power of the regime rests on the obedience of the people under its control. But when East Jerusalem’s Palestinians refused to obey, they completely changed the power relations between the regime and the population. Because Palestinians for the most part stuck to civil disobedience, it was only a matter of time before the government gave in to the pressure and removed the metal detectors. The Netanyahu government so badly misread the situation that they kept repeating the same mantra: “East Jerusalemites won’t have a choice but to get used to the metal detectors.” It turns out that, in fact, they did have a choice, and they were willing to sacrifice quite a bit.

SUBSCRIBE TO +972 MAGAZINE'S WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

SUBMIT

The case of the asylum seekers is vastly different, due mainly to the involvement of Israeli citizens. Citizens have far more power than non-citizens, and thus do not have to resort to the drastic steps that East Jerusalem’s residents were resigned to take.

And yet the dynamic between the state and the citizens remained the same: belligerence and lies that seemed — for a brief moment — to come to a grinding halt in the face of widespread public protest. Here we must examine the limits of public protest. Gene Sharp, a theoretician who wrote extensively on nonviolent struggle and who passed away last January, explained the difference between protest and resistance. The power of protest is to enlist supporters and offer its backing those who invest their time and energy in the struggle.

And while mass demonstrations are of great significance in generating public attention, encouraging refugee aid organizations, and bringing members of Knesset and other public figures into the fold, it is a mistake to think that they alone influenced Netanyahu in his decision making. As long as protest does translate into acts of resistance — that is, exacting a price from the government — the government has no reason to worry. On the contrary.   

Thousands of African asylum seekers and human rights activists protest against deportation, on February 21, 2018. (Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

Thousands of African asylum seekers and human rights activists protest against deportation, on February 21, 2018. (Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

Netanyahu momentarily dropped the idea of deporting asylum seekers — instead adopting the UN refugee agency’s plan — due to real obstacles: Rwanda backing out of the deal, along with serious legal challenges. Let’s not forget that is also a significant protest movement against absorbing asylum seekers in Israel. Just a week ago, those who oppose the asylum seekers were Netanyahu’s biggest allies. All of a sudden, he took the UN deal and leaves his supporters with no choice but to accept their fate.

But the deportation supporters knew that their struggle — as opposed to those who support asylum seekers — could carry a significant price for Netanyahu and his Likud party on election day. Even Education Minister Naftali Bennett seized the opportunity and presented himself as caretaker of all those who were disappointed in Netanyahu. Thus, within a matter of hours, Netanyahu was forced to buckle under pressure.

Preventing catastrophe

Palestinians demonstrate near Khan Yunis by the border fence between Israel and the southern Gaza Strip on March 09, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90

Palestinians demonstrate near Khan Yunis by the border fence between Israel and the southern Gaza Strip on March 09, 2018. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90

In Gaza, Israel’s belligerence is at its most brutal: shooting unarmed civilians in order to kill. In order to justify these actions, the government talks of nightmare scenarios should the demonstrators cross the fence. Putting morality aside, the brutality vis-a-vis Gaza is justified through the same rationale as in the aforementioned cases. Except that when it comes to Gaza, the cruelty is far greater: “They won’t have a choice” becomes “they are afraid to die, so after killing a few will deter the rest.”

And what if this too is a misreading of the reality on the ground? In one day, 16 people were killed (14 of them unarmed) and 750 others were wounded. The Palestinian protest on the Gaza border is expected to continue for at least another six weeks. What will happen if the residents of Gaza act in the same manner as the residents of East Jerusalem and refuse to obey Israel’s brutal dictates? How many will we kill if we discover that Palestinian demonstrators continue to get close to the fence? How many killed is too much, even for us? How many will we kill until Gaza’s popular, nonviolent struggle pushes Palestinians in the West Bank into the streets?

It is impossible to tell where the next few weeks will lead. The problem in Gaza is far more complex than metal detectors or deportation of asylum seekers, and it is hard to imagine a realistic scenario in which Palestinian protesters “win.” But all the ingredients are here: determination, brutality, and arrogance on the Israeli side; determination, rage, and excitement on the Palestinian one.

It’s very likely that, once again, the Israeli government is misreading the situation in such a way that will bring about horrendous bloodshed. It is our duty to forget the scaremongering and state clearly that our government is functioning according to a logic that has been proven, time and time again, to be wrong. The gamble it is taking could bring about another catastrophe in Gaza. We who want to prevent that catastrophe must find effective — and quick — ways to resist.

Aviv Tatarsky is a researcher for Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO that works for an equitable Jerusalem. This post was originally published in Hebrew on Local Call.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Ben

      “and no one refuses an order”

      https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-is-using-tech-to-avoid-facing-what-it-s-doing-to-palestinians-1.5976585

      “…In this way, we’ve reached a situation in which hundreds of snipers fire at unarmed protesters and kill them at a rate of 10 a day – and no one refuses an order. In the first intifada, or even the second, such a situation would have been cause for shock and horror. But not anymore. We’ve trained ourselves – using ideology, religion, algorithms, mindfulness, whatever – to reach a state of consciousness that enables us to overcome the basic instinct of compassion that’s normally aroused in the face of human suffering….”

      Reply to Comment
    2. Katamon

      The Gazan protesters demand the end of the State of Israel. They approach the border and insist that their overall goal is to implement a “return” to a time and place before Israel existed. It isn’t like their intention is to live peacefully in the State of Israel. There is no conceivable scenario under which the State or the vast majority of its citizens will accept that. As such it doesn’t matter how many Gazans try to breach the border or whether they are armed or not. There is no compromise position possible and no limit to the amount of force that will be used to prevent the Gazans from breaching the border. Hamas and the other Palestinian groups in Gaza have chosen a confrontation where the only possible outcome is the deaths of multiple Gazans.

      The comparison to the Jerusalem protests makes no sense. The protesters in Jerusalem had concrete demands that could at least partially be met without significantly impacting Israeli citizens. So far the demands of the Gazan protesters are so fanciful that they are meaningless. As such these protests can only fail.

      Reply to Comment