+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Supreme Court allows Palestinian MK Zoabi to participate in elections

The court unanimously decided to reverse the Central Election Committee’s decision forbidding MK Zoabi (Balad) from running.  In response, a Likud spokesperson vowed that the PM’s party would work to amend the law in order to ensure such disqualifications before the next elections. 

MK Haneen Zoabi (photo: Oren Ziv/ Activestills.org)

The Israeli Supreme Court decided this morning (Sunday) to reverse the Central Election Committee’s decision to prevent MK Haneen Zoabi (Balad) from participating in the coming Knesset elections, due to take place on January 22. The decision was unanimous, with all nine judges – including Supreme Court Chief Justice Asher Gronis – ruling to allow Zoabi to run.

MK Zoabi, the only Palestinian woman in the Knesset, became a target for the Israeli right following her participation in the first flotilla to Gaza. Despite the fact that no charges were brought against her, Zoabi was stripped of some of her parliamentary privileges, and was even attacked in the Knesset by some right-wing members. Immediately after the elections were called, several Members of Knesset from the right announced they would try to ban Zoabi and her party, Balad, from running. The motion to prevent Balad from running failed at the elections committee, but the right won a victory in the effort to ban Zoabi herself, which was even supported by Kadima representatives on the committee.

However, just like in previous attempts to ban Arab MKs from participating in the elections, the decision was reversed by the Supreme Court. Zoabi and her supporters were attacked again by supporters of the right during the hearing of her case at the Supreme Court.

Following the ruling today MK Zoabi said:

The attempts to disqualify me were part of a political and personal persecution against me, my party and the entire Arab public. Along the way, I was convinced that I was right, and that there is no legal ground for the effort to ban me. But today’s decision cannot erase the threats, delegitimization, verbal and physical violence I experienced in the Knesset and outside it in the last three years.

The verdict also goes to show that the Central Elections Committee is a political body that abuses its authority and allows politicians to ban their rivals on ideological grounds. Balad and myself will not be deterred and we will not let anyone in the Knesset or outside it define for us and for the Arab public our legitimate positions and the limits of our political work.

The Likud-Beiteinu Party (the united ticket of Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Avigdor Lieberman) issued the following statement:

We regret the Supreme Court decision to allow MK Zoabi to run in the next Knesset. In light of the Supreme Court’s interpretation [of the law], it’s obvious that the existing law must be changed to state unequivocally that any expression of support for terrorism proscribes one from running for the Knesset. Likud-Yisrael Beitenu will act immediately in the next Knesset to amend the existing law.

MK Zoabi was never charged or convicted for supporting terrorism, not did she make statements to that effect (The IHH, which organized the first flotilla, was not considered a terror organization by Israel at the time). The effort to ban her was doomed to fail, but it should be seen as part of the ongoing attempt to isolate Palestinian representatives in the Knesset and to call into question the status of Palestinians as equal citizens. As the Likud’s comments show, these attempts are only likely to intensify.

Attorney Hasan Jabareen, who represented Zoabi in the court, said:

The fact that the repeated attempts to disqualify Arab MKs and political parties made over the last 15 years have had no legal basis, as the Israeli Supreme Court has consistently ruled, indicates that the aim of the right-wing is to de-legitimize the elected Arab leadership in Israel.

The case of Haneen Zoabi differs from the others in that an attempt was made to de-humanize her and to attack her personally as a woman. She was also branded as a terrorist simply for participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, which was a legitimate political act, and even though she has not been indicted for any crime. By contrast, some right-wing members of Knesset have been indicted for serious crimes and have even served time in prison, and yet there has been no attempt to expel them from the parliament.

Haneen Zoabi is placed second on Balad’s list for the coming elections, so unless the party fails to meet the two-percent threshold, she will serve in the next Knesset.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. XYZ

      I, as a “right-winger” am very pleased. Anyone should be able to run for the Knesset as long as they don’t advocate violence. This includes radical Arabs who say Jews should PEACEFULLY pack their bags and leave the country to the Arabs AND Kahanist Jews who say Arabs should PEACEFULLY pack their bags and leave the country to the Jews. The rule that a party can not be “racist” or must “accept Israel as a Jewish and democratic state” is silly.

      Reply to Comment
    2. rsgengland

      All the noise about the original commitee decision, was such hot air.
      The Court decision was virtually a given, but gave Israels detractors an opportunity to vent their spleen.
      And down South we see the real workings of Middle Eastern Democracy.
      The downgrading of Human Rights in Egypt and wherever else the Arab Spring has struck, and the loss of personal freedoms of citizens, especially women and minorities, should give everyone reason to pause, contemplate and think.
      Israel and her DEMOCRACY may not be perfect, or even ideal, but in comparison to what is available in most of the rest of the world (especially its closest neighbours),
      it is a “DYNAMIC,FREE, ENTERPRISING, SAFE” country overseen by the “RULE OF LAW”, despite what its detractors will allege and claim.

      Reply to Comment
      • Carl

        Yeah it’s not the attempt to bar her that’s the issue, it’s the people who raise it that’s the problem.

        Downgrading of rights in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya? I must have missed the bit when they were all democracies. Then again I must have missed the bit when non-Jewish residents of the West Bank got to vote too. Maybe more upper case will jog my memory.

        Reply to Comment
        • rsgengland

          At no point was Judea and Samaria mentioned in my post.
          They are not part of Israel, they have not been annexed to Israel.
          In law the West Bank is ‘Disputed Territory’, that was recently occupied by The Ottomans, The British Mandate, The Jordanians, and then Israel.
          When the Palestinians sit down to negotiate in good faith, they will have a country.
          It could have been the 1947 UN vote.
          It could have been the area occupied by Egypt and Jordan until 1967.
          It could have been with Barak and Arafat in 2000.
          It could have been the disengagement from Gaza 2006.
          Could have been Olmert and Abass in the late 2000’s.
          It took until 2012 for the Arab world to recognize the 1947 UN Partion vote, but they have yet to and accept the reality on the ground.

          Reply to Comment
    3. ‘No peace without justice’…
      and no democracy without a judge.

      Reply to Comment
      • “it’s obvious that the existing law must be changed to state unequivocally that any expression of support for terrorism proscribes one from running for the Knesset.” : I suspect the future ruling right will eventually provoke a clash with the Supreme Court which will push the latter into greater autonomy. The issues will be internal to Israel, but associated with a general right wing conformist view. Not to say the Court will turn magically left, but that it will begin to form an independent place and line of thought. Strangly, if the right would let up, such a sequence becomes much less likely.

        Reply to Comment
    4. Kolumn9

      Not exactly a surprise, is this?

      Reply to Comment
    5. Piotr Berman


      there is a difference between those who would gladly purge Knesset, and universities, and NGOs etc. and those who do not. It is not just demagoguery on Zoabi issue, but the whole stew of fascist-leaning initiatives, and, sadly, the popularity of those initiatives.

      Reply to Comment