+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

Boycotting these Israeli companies won't get you on any blacklists

Israelis from across the political spectrum are calling to boycott of two major companies for discriminatory practices against women and Ethiopians. But what about that one boycott Israelis will simply not abide?

An El Al pilot hangs out the window of one of the carrier's planes. (Illustrative photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

An El Al pilot hangs out the window of one of the carrier’s planes. (Illustrative photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90)

Israelis, despite their vociferous claims to the contrary, do not fear the power of boycott. In fact, for many Israelis, boycotting companies that profit off discrimination and racism is an essential part of mobilizing against injustice and fighting for democracy. The past week has provided two salutary examples.

On Monday, the CEO of NICE Systems, one of Israel’s largest software companies, announced his company would boycott El Al after a recent flight from New York to Israel was delayed for over an hour because  some ultra-Orthodox male passengers refused to sit next to women. According to CEO Barak Eilam, “at NICE we don’t do business with companies that discriminate against race, gender or religion.”

The threats bore fruit. Following Eilam’s comments, CEO Gonen Usishkin wrote on his Facebook page that El Al is “an egalitarian company regardless of religion, race or gender,” and that “In the future, a passenger who refuses to sit next to another one will be immediately removed from the plane.”

El Al has a well-known history of forcing women to change seats due to pressure from ultra-Orthodox men. Monday’s controversy occurred almost exactly a year after a Jerusalem court ruled that Israel’s national airline is forbidden from asking women to change seats to accommodate a man who refuses to sit next to her. Eliam’s threats to boycott is a sign that should El Al try to circumvent its legal obligations, “corporate responsibility” would hold it accountable. It stands to reason that other Israeli companies will follow suit.

SUBSCRIBE TO +972 MAGAZINE'S WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

SUBMIT

On Tuesday morning, Ethiopian-Israeli employees of Barkan Wine Cellars, one of Israel’s most popular wineries, arrived at work to discover that they had been moved from the production line to other jobs on site. This occurred after Badatz, the ultra-Orthodox organization that has the mandate to certify Barkan products are kosher, questioned just how Jewish those black workers really are. According to halakha, or Jewish religious law, a wine must be produced by Orthodox Jews in order for it to be kosher.

The decision was immediately condemned by religious and political figures alike. Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef said there is “no explanation for such a directive other than pure racism. Ethiopian immigrants are Jews in every sense of the word.” Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein called the move “shameful,” while Labor Party Chairman Avi Gabbay said he would no longer buy Barkan wine and called upon the police to investigate the decision.

Head of the Zionist Union party Avi Gabbay attends a faction meeting in Knesset, June 25, 2018. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Head of the Zionist Union party Avi Gabbay attends a faction meeting in Knesset, June 25, 2018. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

MK Yael German (Yesh Atid) joined the call to boycott Barkan, calling the company’s behavior “shocking and disgusting” and urging “anyone who cares about racism to boycott this wine until they apologize.”

Ethiopians in Israel face discrimination that affects nearly every aspect of their lives. Successive governments have tried to block their immigration to Israel, based on the Law of Return, relying on excuses related to their halakhic status. Ethiopians earn 30-40 percent less than Palestinian citizens of Israel. They are six times more likely to be stopped by police officers than other Israelis, and the brutality officers meted out to Ethiopian citizens of Israel has repeatedly brought them out into the streets in protest.

Mounted policeman hits a protester during an Israeli Ethiopian protest against police brutality and racism, Tel Aviv, May 3rd, 2015. Activestills.org

Mounted policeman hits a protester during an Israeli Ethiopian protest against police brutality and racism, Tel Aviv, May 3rd, 2015. Activestills.org

As of this writing, Barkan has not yet amended its policy toward its black workers. But the calls for a boycott have already spread from politicians to the public. It is hard to imagine that the company will be able to continue without facing additional, far more severe sanctions from the Israeli public.

Israeli society is certainly not unique when it comes to gender segregation or racism, and the fact that civil society and corporations have threatened to use power of the purse to fight El Al and Barkan should be applauded. And yet, the selective outrage over racism and gender segregation — and the alacrity with which Israelis respond — should give us pause.

After all, there is one kind of boycott that Israeli Jews, politicians and public alike, simply will not abide: the kind meant to put pressure on Israel to end 51 years of military dictatorship over the occupied territories.

Israeli BDS activists take part in an anti-corruption demonstration in Tel Aviv's Habima Square, December 9th, 2017. (Hagar Shezaf)

Israeli BDS activists take part in an anti-corruption demonstration in Tel Aviv’s Habima Square, December 9th, 2017. (Hagar Shezaf)

The Israeli government has invested vast sums of taxpayer money in fighting the BDS movement, which seeks to put pressure on both Israel and the companies that profit from the occupation. This includes legislative initiatives against BDS, conferences to discuss how to stop the spread of its ideas, spying on activists, lobbying governments across to world to pass anti-BDS legislation in their countries, paying for anti-BDS journalism, attempting to forbid Israeli academics from supporting academic boycott, and compiling blacklists of and deporting BDS groups and supporters, and more.

But ostensibly liberal politicians like German and Gabbay, who call for a boycott of Barkan to protest the company’s racism, oppose boycotting Israeli companies that profit from the occupation. Why do liberal Israelis consider boycott an appropriate tool to combat racism and discrimination against Jews, even as they oppose those who call for a boycott of those who discriminate against non-Jews? This is the 10,000 shekel question with which all liberals who oppose the occupation must grapple.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. BOAZ

      @Edo :

      Because you and your 972 mag colleagues are much too lenient on those who are not talking about 51 years of occupation but about 70 years.

      Reply to Comment
      • john

        it’s almost like the 70-year regime enables the 51-year old occupation.

        Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Note the prison warden language.

        The occupiers are not even aware of their supremacism, so ingrained and comfortable it is. The solution here is to make the prisoners not prisoners anymore and make feel they are full fledged citizens of one or two states. Not to tighten the screws and throw them into solitary again.

        You’re not going to change anyone’s feelings except inflame them by imprisoning them further. Try making practical peace and treating people with fairness and dignity for once in your lives, and in the generations to follow the feelings will change. Otherwise you have a self-fulfilling prophecy about which you can continue to whine and play the victim, which seems to be what you want anyway.

        Reply to Comment
    2. James Turtle

      Hello, I am a UK resident receiving your news emails. I strongly support the work you are undertaking and have just tried to make a donation via PayPal. The online form was written only in Hebrew which I cannot read unfortunately. I have donated in the past using a form written in English. Can you tell me how to access the English version please? Many thanks.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Gershom

      Ms. Agasi, I can never understand why people who think to make the world a less ugly place (to imagine them decent) by denying what are well known to be facts do not chose to deny the centuries of slavery or the the history of oppression of women and-or their rape with other violence or the Holocaust. I sure wish i could deny such horrible truth and imagine the world and all the people in it to be so much nicer. But no, strangely and repulsively some, mostly those who either are or just would support a right-wing even fascist system of undemocratic rule by an oligarchy just deny the facts we know of Palestinian suffering and survival by the same means and methods by which we know the others. Such slaves to dreadful anti-semites harm the cause and the people they claim to defend by such dishonesty and actually help promote the cause of their opposition for even some idiots know that if all you have to defend your agenda are lies then you are the bad guys, leaving the”other” the good. Is this really how you mean to continue?

      Reply to Comment

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter