+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

An open society or a tribalist one? Israelis will have to choose

A new documentary tells the story of the firebombing of a kindergarten for asylum seekers in Tel Aviv, holding up a mirror to the crucial choice Israeli society faces today.

By Roni Dorot

A still from Roni Geffen's short film, Divine Daycare. (Alex Korin)

A still from Roni Geffen’s short film, Divine Daycare. (Alex Korin)

Roni Geffen’s short film, Divine Daycare, portrays an exercise in tribal solidarity, as well as an exercise in social solidarity beyond tribal bonds. The film follows the story of a kindergarten for refugee children in south Tel Aviv after Israelis threw six Molotov cocktails and torched it. It is deeply moving and touches raw nerves.

One might say – and justifiably so  — that it is not difficult to elicit emotion when the camera focuses on a sweet, smart girl named Lula and her teacher, named Blessing, who perceives her role as far greater than just a kindergarten teacher.

Still, the film is smart because it is effective, revealing a world unknown to most Israelis — in their own backyard. And why should a film to be effective? To spur social change.

An effective documentary confronts a society with something that it prefers to ignore, raises emotions it would rather repress, and thus forces members of that society to identify with those to whom fate has been less kind. Hence its crucial importance, as well as that of the Solidarity Film Festival where the film was screened in Tel Aviv’s Cinematheque.

Sociologist Emile Durkheim argued that the origin of social solidarity in “traditional” societies lies in homogeneity of their members. Tribal resemblances, biological similarities, and a shared sense of belonging enabled individuals to organize, work towards a common interest, and care for each other. He called this “mechanical solidarity.” In contrast, according to Durkheim, modern societies, characterized by a complex division of labor, and perhaps other forms of diversity, generate a different, “organic” kind of solidarity.

How to build solidarity among different and divergent groups is one of the most crucial questions facing Israeli society today. Finding ways to look beyond the logic of tribal resemblance is fundamental to the struggle for peace and human dignity. Israeli society must find a way to generate solidarity with those marked as “others” who live within its borders.

The burnt kindergarten (Yotam Ronen / Activestills)

An Eritrean man stands among the remains of a burnt kindergarten in south Tel Aviv. The kindergarten went up in flames the night before after being firebombed. (Yotam Ronen/Activestills)

In one of the film’s scenes, Lula asks her mother to take her home because she misses her. Normally, Lula sleeps at Blessing’s kindergarten because her mother struggles to take care of her. The kindergarten has no chairs and tables — they were burnt in the arson attack. There are roaches in the kindergarten. About six toddlers shared one mattress during the day. Sweet Lula, however, is not afraid of Molotov cocktails because “the fire can only burn chairs and toys.” Any mother who has ever carefully selected her child’s kindergarten would faint long before this — watching the scene where Blessing’s children eat overly-sugared chocolate cornflakes, without milk, from dishes on the floor.

In a contrasting scene, Geffen draws on archival footage of now-minister Miri Regev inciting local residents against Sudanese and Eritrean refugees, shouting, “the Sudanese are a cancer in our bodies.” Regev externalizes the moral choices Israeli society faces: between an open society, characterized by cross-group social and a closed, tribal society.

But there is tribe and there is tribe. There is the larger, Jewish tribe favored by Miri Regev, and there is the smaller, nuclear tribe of family, with which the director Roni Geffen comes face-to-face in the film. The kindergarten Blessing operates and the property where she lives belong to Geffen’s uncle, unbeknownst to Geffen (the film claims), and the uncle demands that Blessing leave immediately. He argues that the illegal kindergarten puts him at risk — that he’s liable for breaking the law.

But Blessing and the toddlers have nowhere to go. No one will agree to rent a house out to the kindergarten. Geffen attempts to straighten things out with her uncle, but he refuses to abandon his tribal commitments. “Roni,” he says “I will not let anyone hurt me. Nobody!” His fear of the law is justified, but what matters more is his refusal to do business with “those people.”

Dr. Roni Dorot edits ‘Documania,’ a sociological blog on documentary films at Haaretz, where an early version of this article was published.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ben

      Israelis cannot say that this attitude towards and treatment of others is a “fringe” or “extremist” phenomenon except in the sense that the extremists are running the government and the Israeli public elected them and keeps them there to its satisfaction. Miri Regev is Culture and Sports Minister, and sits clucking contentedly at Bibi’s side. This attitude, this problem, is central to Israeli society. Other advanced Western cultures struggle with this too, witness the shame of Americans tolerating a president who tears children from their parents at the border and puts them in cages, but the Americans, enough of whom retain a sense of shame, quickly forced Trump to back down, saying in effect, “not in our name.” Israeli society, not just its Trump-ian leaders such as Regev and Netanyahu (not to mention his just-indicted wife), shows no sign that I can see of having this kind or degree of capacity for shame.

      Reply to Comment
      • john

        i think you’ll appreciate this quote from a joseph conrad story: “But fanaticism is human. Man has adored ferocious divinities. There is ferocity in every passion, even in love itself. The religion of undying hope resembles the mad cult of despair, of death, of annihilation. The difference lies in the moral motive springing from the secret needs and the unexpressed aspiration of the believers. It is only to vain men that all is vanity; and all is deception only to those who have never been sincere with themselves.”

        Reply to Comment
        • Ben

          That’s a great quotation from Conrad. Thank you. This is the truth. Fanaticism is human, all too human. Ecce Homo. The American Founders of course knew this only too well, their political genius devoted to checking it.

          Reply to Comment