+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

For Israel, Khan al-Ahmar residents lack 'good faith' displayed by settlers

As far as Israel is concerned, the demolition and displacement of Palestinian communities cannot be prevented, because they lack the good intentions that seemingly only Jewish settlers have.

By Sharona Weiss

Israeli policemen scuffle with Palestinian demonstrators in the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar, east of Jerusalem, on July 4, 2018. (Flash90)

Israeli policemen scuffle with Palestinian demonstrators in the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar, east of Jerusalem, on July 4, 2018. (Flash90)

An interim injunction that prevented the demolition and eviction of the Jahalin Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar ends on September 12. Israel will then face the weighty choice of whether to reveal the true colors of its decades-long occupation, and whether to forcibly transfer an entire community, simply for the inconvenience it poses to the settlement project.

Khan al-Ahmar is located between Jerusalem and the West Bank settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, an area known as E1. For decades, Israel has tried to drive Palestinians out of this area, as part of a broader strategy to form a bloc of settlements that will divide the West Bank, thereby preventing the territorial contiguity necessary for a two-state solution.

Israel’s High Court of Justice approved the demolition of Khan al-Ahmar on September 5, a ruling that could have significant ramifications for an estimated 13,000 Palestinian structures facing demolition orders in the occupied West Bank.

Just a week earlier, the Jerusalem District Court ruled to legalize Mitzpe Kramim, an unauthorized Israeli outpost in the West Bank. In an unprecedented legal tactic, the Jerusalem court ruled that the Mitzpe Kramim settlers erected their community “in good faith,” and granted them rights to the property.

Both Mitzpe Kramim and Khan al-Ahmar were built without the necessary permits – Mitzpe Kramim on privately owned Palestinian land, Khan al-Ahmar on so-called state (public) land that was confiscated from Palestinian landowners from Anata in 1975 (the question as to whether the government completed the plot’s registration as state land came up in proceedings). Both communities requested that their civilian structures be legalized retroactively.

The difference? Apparently, only one community has the quality of good faith: decent, well-behaved Israeli settlers who gained rights to property that they seized illegally, all because their intentions were assumed innocent. This legal argument could pave the way for the legalization of many other unauthorized outposts. But how could one consider these settlers as thieves or trespassers, when they carry such goodness in their hearts?

Palestinian students begin a new academic year at the school of Khan al-Ahmar on August 17, 2016. (Flash90)

Palestinian students begin a new academic year at the school of Khan al-Ahmar on August 17, 2016. (Flash90)

Bedouins, or other Palestinians, on the other hand? Their intentions are never presumed innocent. Even according to Israel’s highest court, their hearts do not hold enough virtue to allow the legalization of their schools and homes. Instead, Israel gave the 30-plus Bedouin families living in Khan al-Ahmar two choices: to be relocated near a garbage dump or next to a sewage treatment facility. As far as the state is concerned, their dreams are not lofty enough, better fit for crumbling among garbage or sewage.

The Israeli government once again demonstrated that it views Jewish settlers as too good, too superior to suffer any consequences for their “well-intentioned” disregard for the law. Even those hailing from illegal outposts such as Adei Ad, where settlers not only build without permits, but also consistently harass and employ violence against Palestinians as a tool to take over their land, enjoy significant rewards. These include expansive jurisdictions, protections, and, of course, legalization. Can one imagine if the residents of Adei Ad were offered to live next to garbage or sewage? Surely not. Their aspirations, and those of their children, are seemingly too precious for the state.



Israel has arrived at a precipice: to go forward with an act that will, in many ways, define its moral trajectory, and its reputation around the world, or to choose restraint for the sake of all of our futures. Ironically, this occurs just before entering a period of collective and personal introspection, before the holiest day of Yom Kippur, and before Sukkot, a holiday in which Jews remember what it was like to live without shelter while desperately escaping oppression.

As we step into the High Holidays, will Israel simply turn away from the imploring eyes of the children in Khan al-Ahmar as their school is potentially destroyed, and as they face eviction from their homes? If so, we will communicate a very clear message: your dreams, little ones, are simply a hindrance to the Jewish State; your futures will be sacrificed on a field of political maneuvers, and your hearts are simply not full of the good faith that children in Jewish settlements hold as they expand to enjoy your land, and wreak havoc on your way of life – with all the best intentions, of course.

Sharona Weiss works as the Director of international relations and advocacy at the Israeli human rights organization, Yesh Din.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article

    * Required


    1. Ben

      The comparison here of Mitzpe Kramim and Khan al-Ahmar says it all. (It’s like a control condition in an experiment, correcting for the endless, Orwellian BS about the supposed “rule of law” being applied to Khan al-Ahmar.) The settlers as “good faith” practitioners! People who actually epitomize deviousness! The mind boggles. And the Israeli court system stamps its seal of approval on that chicanery. But the poor residents of Khan al-Ahmar? Oh, nothing doing. They aren’t “good faith” practitioners!

      If this is not apartheid, nothing is.

      Sharona Weiss has written a +972 classic, an article that says it all and speaks the truth about Israel’s “moral trajectory.”

      Reply to Comment
    2. Ben

      About those settlers’ and Israel’s “good faith”….

      Israel Knowingly Gave Private Palestinian Land to West Bank Outpost
      Haaretz investigation shows World Zionist Organization did not act in good faith, as a judge ruled in August, but Settlement Division defends its actions


      An investigation by Haaretz has found that the Settlement Division assigned the rights to land in the settlement outpost of Mitzpe Kramim, two months after the government was informed that the plots were in fact Palestinian-owned and had been transferred to the World Zionist Organization department in error, despite claims to the contrary.

      The Settlement Division also submitted to banks documents testifying that the outpost residents were the legal owners so they could obtain mortgages, months after discovering that the land belonged to Palestinians. The Settlement Division thus enabled settlers to get mortgages before ownership status of the land had been finalized…..

      Reply to Comment