+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

'50 years of occupation is 50 years too many'

As the Right celebrates 50 years of military rule over the Palestinians, the Left must not be afraid to create alliances between struggles and remind Israelis that ending the occupation is everyone’s task.

By Eli Bitan

Thousands of Israelis attend a left-wing rally calling for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Rabin Square in Tel Aviv, May 27, 2017. (Flash90)

Thousands of Israelis attend a left-wing rally calling for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Rabin Square in Tel Aviv, May 27, 2017. (Flash90)

The following is the full text of Local Call blogger and editor Eli Bitan’s speech in front of 10,000 left-wing protesters at Saturday’s anti-occupation rally:

Today we count 47 days days until the Omer. Today, in the early hours of the morning, we finished counting 41 days since thousands of political prisoners went on hunger strike to protest their conditions. A strike that ended this morning.

Forty-one days without food, without meeting their attorneys, and with violent attempts at breaking their spirit. Forty-one days in which masses of Palestinians have been protesting, both in Israel and in the West Bank, to improve their conditions — worse than any other prisoners, regardless of what they were jailed for. Forty-one days in which we, Israel’s Jewish citizens, have known nearly nothing about this strike or the demands of the prisoners — all under the auspices of a silent media, and the lies of Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan, who lied to the U.S. president in our name, lies to us in the name of the Netanyahu government, just as he did with Umm al-Hiran. Bald-faced lies.

Forty-one days in which two Palestinians were killed by the Border Police or settlers: Saba Abu Ubeid from Nabi Saleh and Muataz Hussein Hilal Bani Shamsa from the village Beita near Nablus. These were two young men who went out to protest in support of the hunger striking prisoners.

Saba Abu Ubeid, moments after being shot by an Israeli sniper, May 12, 2017. Ubeid was pronounced dead in hospital shortly after. (Miki Kratsman/Activestills.org)

Saba Abu Ubeid, moments after being shot by an Israeli sniper, May 12, 2017. Ubeid was pronounced dead in hospital shortly after. (Miki Kratsman/Activestills.org)

My name is Eli Bitan. I grew up in Ramat Beit Shemesh within an ultra-Orthodox family. I studied in a Shas-run school and later on in a yeshiva in Bnei Brak, two very Haredi institutions. Like most Israelis, I was raised on the ethos that Israel stretches out its hand in peace. I was raised to believe that Israelis want peace, and will do everything they can to achieve it. That there is a small, marginal group — ideological settlers — who view war as victory and revere land over life.

The ultra-Orthodox, as opposed to what many believe in Israel, are moderate when it comes to these issues. Two of its most prominent leaders over the past 50 years held clear dovish positions: Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, who granted halakhic legitimacy to the peace deal with Egypt and political legitimacy to the Oslo Accords, and Rabbi Elazar Shach, who did not allow the ultra-Orthodox Agudat Yisrael party to join Menachem Begin’s government until he pledged not to go to war without the former’s approval. Shach gave hundreds of political speeches in which he repeated the halakhic worldview, which sanctifies human life over land. No, this is not a Left that speaks about equality and human rights, but this is not a sector that opposes the two-state solution, as has been proven time and time again.

Only once I grew up and learned the distant and recent history did I understand how far we — all of us — have been led astray. Our bleeding hand is outstretched in peace, yet not the hands of our prime ministers and elected officials, which have been responsible for 50 years of dispossession, theft, and occupation of the Palestinians. Through deceptions, both internal and external, the settlers in the government are doing everything they can to maintain conflict and war, which creates more victims from both people on a daily basis. And yet, despite the rise of a violent right-wing, the majority of people in Israel and Palestine believe in and want two states for two people.

50 Years Too Many in-text banner

I am a young man, there are people in the crowd who are veteran activists against the occupation who have paid a big price for this struggle. It is my honor to stand before you and speak tonight.

I remember the first time I came to Rabin Square to a protest. I was a 17-year-old yeshiva student dressed in a white dress shirt and carrying a black jacket in my bag. Just like back then, today I look around and ask myself where is everybody? Where are all the Israelis who pay the terrible price for the occupation? I stood there alone with my white shirt and black kippa. Today there are a few dozen ultra-Orthodox, but this is not enough. There are hundreds and thousands of young haredim, men and women, who discover the heavy price they have paid for the political alliance with the Right. Our role is to make them feel at home, to create an alliance between struggles, not to let the differences make us forget that we all live on this land, and that yes — ending the occupation is everyone’s task, everyone who lives here.

Fifty years of occupation, of an enormous, never-ending injustice, force us to stop working within our comfort zones, to join new groups, and to let Palestinians lead the struggle. As the Right divides us, it is incumbent that we make connections. As the Right incites, we must meet and talk. As they try to put up walls to divide us into classes, tribes, and sectors, we must break through the differences they invented and join together. As the Right celebrates 50 years on the deck of the Titanic, we must shine a light on the occupation and say, without fear: these have been 50 years too many.

Eli Bitan is a journalist in the Haredi press in Israel, and is a blogger on Local Call, where this post was originally published in Hebrew.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Lewis from Afula

      For once, I agree with the 972 magazine article headline. The Arabs should have not started the 6 day war. The so-called “fakestinyans” would never have been conjured up and the Jordanians living in Tulkarm, Nablus, Jericho, Bethlehem etc would now be living peace with Israelis. Also, there would have been no war in Sinai with Egypt and no peace treaty to give it all back. Thousands of people would still be alive.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Mark

      Don’t forget the 19 years of Jordanian occupation!

      Reply to Comment
    3. duh

      Since we all have our favorite historical tidbits, mine would be how Herzl lobbied the Germans and British (as did later WZO leaders) to be part of an eventual occupation of Palestine. Wanna-be occupiers today, real occupiers tomorrow.

      Reply to Comment
      • i_like_ike52

        What about the Arab/Muslim occupation of Palestine, that followed the most massive case of imperialist aggression in history when the Arabs burst out of the Arabian peninsula in the 7th century, conquering the entire Middle East and imposing the religion, culture and most of all, religion by FORCE on the region and extinguishing many existing cultures? How is THAT for REAL “occupation”?

        Reply to Comment
        • Lewis from Afula

          I-like-ike52
          Pst….We don’t like to talk about Arab aggression. That will spoil our SWJ credentials.

          Reply to Comment
        • Ben

          It’s about real people, on the ground, alive today. It’s about human rights. It’s not about abstract, concocted historical grievances from ten or twenty centuries ago.

          This is how the Book of Joshua describes the conquest of the city of Ai (Joshua 8:24-29): “And it came to pass, when Israel had made an end of slaying all the inhabitants of Ai in the field, even in the wilderness wherein they pursued them, and they were all fallen by the edge of the sword, until they were consumed, that all Israel returned unto Ai, and smote it with the edge of the sword. … So Joshua burnt Ai, and made it a heap forever, even a desolation, unto this day. And the king of Ai he hanged on a tree until the eventide; and at the going down of the sun Joshua commanded, and they took his carcass down from the tree, and cast it at the entrance of the gate of the city, and raised thereon a great heap of stones, unto this day.”
          read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.791115

          Would you like to track down the descendants of the Ai region that escaped this “imposing the culture and religion by FORCE on the region and extinguishing many existing cultures,” and offer them some land in the West Bank?

          Reply to Comment
        • duh

          “most massive case of imperialist aggression in history”

          *Raises eyebrow* If you mean largest in history to that point, probably, but in history, period? Hell, no.

          Anyway, by the late 1800’s the international order consisted of tiny European states controlling huge overseas land masses (Plus breakaway states like the US, et. al). The Zionists were trying to find their own little niche in this system. If the British hadn’t invaded Palestine, they would’ve had to do it themselves or no “Jewish” state.

          Reply to Comment
    4. Itshak Gordin Halevy

      They speak of occupation but for most Jews and Christian friends of Israel, we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the liberation of the Jewish occupied territories (Judea and Samaria), among them the Jewish holy cities of Jerusalem and Hevron (where the Jewish patriarchs are buried).

      Reply to Comment

The stories that matter.
The missing context.
All in one weekly email.

Subscribe to +972's newsletter