+972 Magazine's Stories of the Week

Directly In Your Inbox

Analysis News
Visit our Hebrew site, "Local Call" , in partnership with Just Vision.

10 years since 'Cast Lead': How Israel first declared total war on Gaza

The firepower, scale of destruction, and numbers of Palestinians killed during Operation Cast Lead were unprecedented in the brutal history of the conflict. Since then, the tactics used have become part of the IDF’s arsenal in its wars on Gaza. 

By Avihai Stollar

Israeli tanks standing on the Israel-Gaza border while smoke billows from Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, January 14, 2009. (Yossi Zamir/Flash90)

Israeli tanks standing on the Israel-Gaza border while smoke billows from Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, January 14, 2009. (Yossi Zamir/Flash90)

Ten years have passed since the Israeli army changed the way it wages war, the amount of risk it is willing to expose its soldiers to, and the scope of firepower and destruction it is willing to utilize in Palestinian population centers and at Palestinian civilians.

“Cast Lead was an unprecedented operation,” Senat, an extra-parliamentary research and policy group, determined in 2009. “All records were broken with regard to firepower directed against the Gaza Strip, the scope of military forces that partook, the number of armed combatants and civilians killed, the number of houses demolished, and any other imaginable record.”

The profound change in combat doctrine was a result of lessons learned from the Second Intifada and the Second Lebanon War, which, many believed ended undetermined, if not with an Israeli defeat. In its preparations for the 2009 operation in Gaza, the Israeli army set out not only to guarantee victory and eradicate the disgrace of its previous war, but also to avoid heavy military and civilian casualties on the Israeli side — a price it believed the public would not be willing to pay again.

At the same time, a new military ethics doctrine was formulated, determining that the army must conduct itself in a manner that prevents risking IDF soldiers’ lives, even when that makes the loss of enemy civilian lives inevitable. The document was never officially approved but the IDF adopted its spirit, as indicated by former IDF Spokesperson, Brig.-Gen. Avi Benayahu, who said at the time: “Our first priority is our citizens, second come our soldiers, third come their civilians, and fourth — their terrorists. ”

SUBSCRIBE TO +972 MAGAZINE'S WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

SUBMIT

The combination of the scars of the Second Lebanon War and the new ethical doctrine meant that the IDF’s guiding principle in Cast Lead were that preserving the lives of Israeli troops took precedence over civilians in Gaza Strip at almost any cost. Accordingly, the Israeli army declared the entire Gaza Strip a war zone, in which it used military practices intended for military-to-military combat, despite the fact that the operation took place in areas where it was impossible to make a clear distinction between enemy forces and civilians. Thus, artillery generally used in military combat was employed in populated areas for the first time; every time IDF ground forces entered Gaza’s neighborhoods and villages was preceded by artillery fire.

The IDF used approximately 3,000 explosive shells during Cast Lead, with each shell expected to wound or kill anyone located within dozens of meters from the point of impact. “I didn’t believe for one moment that there could be a plan for artillery fire on Gaza, since Gaza is too dense and the artillery’s dispersal (collateral damage) is insane,” a soldier who partook in Cast Lead described in a testimony given to Breaking the Silence. “Even if I’m very precise it’s useless. Choosing artillery is very, very problematic — civilian neighborhoods and artillery don’t go well together. Your ability to be precise is non-existent and you shoot in order to destroy.”

A Palestinian family sits in the rubble of their home during Operation Cast Lead, January 19, 2009, Jabaliya, Gaza Strip. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

A Palestinian family sits in the rubble of their home during Operation Cast Lead, January 19, 2009, Jabaliya, Gaza Strip. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Standard IDF open fire regulations permit shooting at a person only in cases where the soldiers identify a weapon and the capacity and intention to use it. Yet, the orders during Cast Lead permitted soldiers to use their own discretion, sometimes deeming anyone present in the combat zone — who wasn’t an IDF soldier — an enemy combatant toward whom fire may be directed. Many soldiers testified that they were told there was no such thing as a civilian in the areas they entered, as civilians had been instructed to leave. In practice, soldiers repeatedly testified that they encountered civilians inside the homes they took over, sometimes even entire families who hid in their homes.

The lenient open fire regulations were translated into massive firepower. The forces advanced under the cover of artillery and tank fire — after leaflets were dropped instructing residents to leave their homes — and as troops shot at any threat in the area, whether substantive or perceived. “Our basic feeling was that the earth was shaking constantly, there were explosions all day, flashes all night, [fire] power the likes of which we weren’t familiar. D9s were also working around the clock, constantly busy. It’s a completely different [fire] power from what we know,” one soldier testified.

A Palestinian child plays among the ruins of buildings destroyed by Israeli air strikes in the 2008-2009 war known as Operation Cast Lead, July 4, 2012.

A Palestinian child plays among the ruins of buildings destroyed by Israeli air strikes during Operation Cast Lead in 2008-2009, July 4, 2012. (Activestills.0rg)

The IDF’s activity in civilian neighborhoods was also characterized by systematic demolitions. Soldiers’ testimonies reveal that D9s (military bulldozers) – and in some cases Combat Engineering Corps teams – began toppling buildings immediately upon entering the neighborhoods. According to the soldiers, some buildings were thought to be booby-trapped, others might have contained exit piers of enemy tunnels, while others were demolished because they were taller than the structures occupied by IDF forces and overlooked them.

In addition to the fact that the authority to determine which buildings to demolish was in the hands of junior commanders in the field, the systematic destruction was likely the result of implementing the “Dahiya doctrine,” named after a neighborhood of Beirut the IDF heavily bombed in the Second Lebanon War.

Lieutenant General (ret.) Gadi Eizenkot addressed the doctrine in 2008, noting that:

What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006, would happen in every village from which shots were fired toward Israel. We will wield disproportionate power against it and cause immense damage and destruction. As far as we are concerned, these are not civilian villages but rather military bases.

Operation Cast Lead was different from any prior operation. The firepower, the scale of destruction, the amount of dead and wounded were all unprecedented in the brutal history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, military operations in Gaza ever since have proven that the means of combat first used in Cast Lead were no isolated incidents. In fact, these same trends have since recurred and even escalated.

SUBSCRIBE TO +972 MAGAZINE'S WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

SUBMIT

The “Dahiya doctrine” and other “zero-risk” policies remain in place without ever being brought forth for genuine public discourse. When brand-new politician, former IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz, proudly used footage of a completely razed Palestinian neighborhood as a campaign video, as the Israeli public we must realize that in some sense it was our choice to conduct these operations in Gaza through such means. If we don’t sound our voices in dissent – the blood of civilian casualties in the next round of violence will be on our hands as well.

Avihai Stollar is an army and human rights researcher, and former director of the Testimonies and Research Department of Breaking the Silence. This article was first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.

Before you go...

A lot of work goes into creating articles like the one you just read. And while we don’t do this for the money, even our model of non-profit, independent journalism has bills to pay.

+972 Magazine is owned by our bloggers and journalists, who are driven by passion and dedication to the causes we cover. But we still need to pay for editing, photography, translation, web design and servers, legal services, and more.

As an independent journalism outlet we aren’t beholden to any outside interests. In order to safeguard that independence voice, we are proud to count you, our readers, as our most important supporters. If each of our readers becomes a supporter of our work, +972 Magazine will remain a strong, independent, and sustainable force helping drive the discourse on Israel/Palestine in the right direction.

Support independent journalism in Israel/Palestine Donate to +972 Magazine today
View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    * Required

    COMMENTS

    1. Bruce Gould

      Jeff Halper, “War against the people: Israel, the Palestinians and global pacification” (Youtube video):

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMVA29Mp9LQ

      Halper opens with the question: how does Israel get away with this?

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Great video. Halper is a good speaker.

        Synopsis of the first 17 minutes:

        The Jewish lobby?…AIPAC?…guilt over the Holocaust?…Christian fundamentalists?…none of it really explains why Israel gets away with what it gets away with, the support that it gets in the wider world….

        Look not down at the occupation for a second but up at the wider world. It’s about military security exports…the Palestinians were not really the target of the Israeli military machine…the incredible disproportionate attack on Gaza shows this…in fact the occupied territories are a laboratory, and the Palestinians are the guinea pigs. Israel’s major export is the occupation. A leader in biometrics, all kinds of technology, surveillance and control technology…that is the quid pro quo…

        Israel becomes the center for the export of military and security and surveillance systems, and models of control. Israel was lucky to quickly move into being a leader in a world preoccupied with security. Global pacification….

        The end result is a kind of globalized Palestine. Your military and police forces are being Israelized, which means that you the people are being Palestinianized. We are all Palestinians. We are all on the receiving end of these technologies.

        Largest polluter in the world is the military — not an issue that the greens and the left has really talked about much because we don’t know that much about it…

        But there is even a higher level..capitalism…even talking about capitalism sounds old fashioned…that is the success of the capitalist system…like fish in water we can’t even see the bigger world (the water) we live in. We feel certain specific issues but we don’t see where they are coming from because even talking about the larger world systems has become old fashioned, we don’t even want to hear it. You can’t even understand the logic of the whole system unless you look at the role of arms in security politics and the role of that in the larger system of capitalism.

        Reply to Comment
    2. itshak Gordine

      t is said that there is a serious humanitarian crisis in Gaza. One can doubt when seeing the picture of these two fat women …

      Reply to Comment
      • Ben

        Sometimes I feel sorry for you because I think you are limited but then I see you pulling something like this and despite your limitations I no longer feel sorry for you.

        Reply to Comment
      • David

        Itshak Gordine

        Ah, yes, spoken like a true dedicated fascist. News flash: You and your ilk along with the fascistic entity known as “Israel” are doomed, i.e., – headed for history’s dumpster.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Lewis from Afula

      Cast Lead was a spectacular failure.
      The enemy should have been totally bashed, its military structures totally obliterated and its enemy civilians relocated to Northern Sinai – which is 10-30 kn down the road. After the remnant Hamas leadership offers their Total Unconditional Surrender, Aza should be annexed by Israel and am end of conflict will be Declared to the Entire World.

      Reply to Comment
      • David

        Lewis from Afula

        Like all bloodthirsty Zionists, you take pleasure in slaughtering the innocent, the defenseless. The good news is that you and your ilk’s days are numbered.

        BTW, you would have had a brilliant career serving Germany’s Third Reich. We all know what happened to it.

        Sieg Heil!!

        Reply to Comment