Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

How does SodaStream treat its Palestinian workers when the media isn't looking?

According to Palestinian workers at the West Bank factory, they were provided with meager and unsuitable food at the end of a day of fasting; those who complained were fired immediately. SodaStream: ‘The termination process was done legally’

By Niv Hachlili / Ha-Makom

Wednesday, July 2, was especially tense. The funerals for the three murdered Israeli teenagers, Gilad Shaar, Naftali Fraenkel and Eyal Yifrach had taken place the day before. Gangs of rioters were already roaming the streets of Jerusalem, and Ramadan was entering its third day. It was 8 p.m. and the night shift workers at the SodaStream factory in Mishor Adumim (the industrial zone of the Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim) headed to the dining room for their first meal after 16 hours of fasting.

Ahmed Nasar Al-Adin, a worker in the metal quality assurance department at the factory recounts that “on the first and second day of Ramadan the food was entirely fine,” but that on that night, when the approximately 40 shift workers arrived tired and hungry, they discovered that instead of the five trays of food that were supposed to be in the cafeteria, there were only “two trays, one with a little bit of schnitzel and the other with chicken that was both appalling and insufficient for all the workers.”

They decided to contact the supervisor of the cafeteria, who was absent that night, contrary to the previous days. “We spoke to him and he said that this is what there is. Whoever wants to, will eat; whoever doesn’t, won’t eat. This is what there is.” The workers also turned to the shift supervisor in the factory, who gave them the same answer.

SodaStream is a successful company that is working toward obtaining a significant portion of the global drink market and is trying to brand itself as an ethical and “green” company. At the beginning of the year SodaStream became embroiled in a public scandal when it hired the actress Scarlett Johansson to advertise its brand worldwide, a move that led to criticism against the actress since the company’s factory is located across the Green Line in the West Bank. In response to this criticism, the company repeatedly emphasized that its factory provides jobs for hundreds of Palestinian workers and serves as a locus of coexistence between the two peoples.

The meal meant for 40 workers to break their Ramadan fast while on shift at the SodaStream factory. (photo: SodaStream workers)

The meal meant for 40 workers to break their Ramadan fast while on shift at the SodaStream factory. (photo: SodaStream workers)

Due to Kosher restrictions, the hundreds of Palestinian workers are forbidden from bringing in food from the outside and are therefore reliant on the food the factory provides. “This was not the first time this has happened on the night shift,” says Al-Adin. “We have discussed this with the management before, but there was no improvement. There were instances of insufficient bread and vegetables, and instances of not enough to drink.”

This time, however, the situation was different, since during Ramadan the workers fast all day and the management is aware of that. A few days before the holiday the management posted a message promising that there would be appropriate food and that workers would be provided with a room to rest in should there be need for it.

The workers tried to reason with the shift supervisor for over an hour. The solution suggested to them was that the workers would eat the packaged meal they get at 3 a.m., an hour before their return to the fast, which includes a box of hummus, sour cream, tuna, and sliced cheese. “I explained to him that we have been fasting for 16 hours and it is unreasonable to expect us to only eat this packaged meal. It’s not enough food for someone who stands and works for 12 hours,” says Al-Adin. At this point it seems that the management lost patience. “The shift and transportation supervisors told us that there is nothing to do at this point and that the shift has been canceled.”

The next morning the workers on that shift received phone calls from the management that notified them of the decision to terminate their contracts because they refused to return to work that evening. “They also claimed we were violent. The factory has cameras documenting every corner. Lets see the tape. What violence are they talking about?” asks Al-Adin.

It seems as if the spirit of coexistence on which the SodaStream factory prides itself was absent among the top management of the company, which entirely ignored its workers. “No one has addressed the workers to this point. Don’t they think we should be heard too?” asks A., who was fired overnight.

A notice to the workers contains claims Al-Adin is referring to. “They hung a notice on the message board,” recounts A., another factory worker. “The night shift workers who came to eat were disappointed by the variety of food served…  and decided on their own that they are unwilling to return to work until other food was served to them,” claimed the notice. “Despite attempts to explain to them that the food is of sufficient quality… the workers decided they are unwilling to return to work and they wish to go home immediately…  it is worth noting that the atmosphere around this entire event was heated and contained hints of violence.”

The letter from SodaStream management sent to the employees who were fired overnight (photo: SodaStream workers)

The letter from SodaStream management sent to the employees who were fired overnight (photo: SodaStream workers)

“On the contrary, we told them we do not want to go home,” says Al-Adin, “that in fact we want to return to work. But they sent us home. They told us that the managers would meet tomorrow and would solve this, and that we should sign out and go.”

“We see this incident as very grave… something we cannot allow to become routine and, therefore, all the workers involved have been fired immediately without the usual severance payment,” the management wrote in its notice to the workers. Al-Adin confirms the statement: “The manager who called the fired workers said that the management decided not to have a hearing because of the severity of their act.” What is the basis for the company’s claim that the workers did not want to return to work? “It’s what the night managers said.”

One might guess that even if the actual implementation of “coexistence” is not truly at the top of the list of priorities at SodaStream, their advertising themselves as such is likely not bad for business. In May the company published its forecast for the rest of the year, predicting a 15% increase for 2014, compared with income of $562.7 million in 2013; and a forecast of a 3% increase in profit in 2014, compared with profit of $42 million in 2013.

The factory in Ma’ale Adumim employs about 1,100 people. It seems that there are good reasons why more than 800 of them, the majority of the production line in the different departments, are Palestinian. Whoever wants to work at the factory, which functions 24 hours a day, seven days a week, is required to work 12-hour shifts, including Friday and Saturday. The average worker labors 220-250 hours per month. An assembly line worker averages 23 shekels an hour. Al-Adin, who worked as a quality control technician in the metal department, has a degree in materials science. His wage was 27 shekels an hour.

Several of the workers were relatively new, having been employed for about 10 months. “I worked at the factory for two years and two months but there are also those who worked for 4-5 years and we were fired just like that, with a phone call. They told us not to return, and that we could pick up our termination notice on Sunday,” says Al-Adin.

SodaStream employees who were fired overnight wait outside the premises to collect their letters of dismissal and personal belongings.

SodaStream employees who were fired overnight wait outside the premises to collect their letters of dismissal and personal belongings. (photo: SodaStream workers)

But the humiliation did not stop there. “When we came to take the termination notices they blocked us from entering the factory, and whoever did get in, finally, was accompanied by guards. We, the ones who did not enter, they broke into our lockers, without any one of us around. This is our privacy here, and they brought our stuff outside.”

In a truly bizarre coincidence, on Friday, two days after these aggressive terminations, the Israeli news website NRG published a special column (Hebrew) entitled “Coexistence: This is How to Make Peace.” The author, who spent time in the company’s “special” cafeteria was impressed that “… one of the only places in Israel in which coexistence, tolerance, and hope, even in these times, is preserved, is in SodaStream’s factory in Ma’ale Adumim.” The company’s profits, its treatment of its workers, and its aggressive terminations somehow went unmentioned.

The Workers Advice Center WAC-MAAN, which represents the fired workers, stated that “If SodaStream does not comply with our demand to return the workers to the factory immediately, MAAN will act in the legal and public arenas to guarantee their rights.”

SodaStream has responded: “The entire termination process was done legally, there was a hearing, and the workers were not deprived of compensation payments. SodaStream treats all its workers with respect, and therefore a special hot meal to break the fast was provided for its Muslim workers. Nevertheless, the workers chose – without relation to the quality of the food or to the quantity of the food – to not enter the cafeteria at all, and afterwards they stopped work on the assembly lines. SodaStream cannot accept a situation in which workers who don’t think the food is appropriate stop work on the assembly lines and manifestly ignore the orders of supervisors.”

The original post was published in Hebrew on the independent news site, The Hottest Place in Hell (Ha-makom)

Related:
5 things I learned from the Scarlett Johansson/SodaStream affair
Scarlett Johansson chooses SodaStream over Oxfam
The cynical use of Palestinians in the SodaStream controversy

Newsletter Banner 2 - 540

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Whiplash

      A cardinal rule of labour law is that if a worker or group of workers have a grievance within their work environment, they work then grieve. In this case, they should have eaten what was prepared, gone back to work and then grieved the matter. If he or they refused to or stopped work, they risked being dismissed and then grieving the loss of their jobs.

      Reply to Comment
      • Reza Lustig

        Yes, they should take it like good little Arab peons, and complain LATER. Why don’t YOU see how you like not getting paid enough/given enough time off?

        Reply to Comment
      • Baz

        Unfortunately, it was not the first time this happened. They use religion to tell them they cannot bring their own food. Fair enough, follow kashrut. However, they looked cheap and did not give them a lot of food. They make plenty of money.

        Reply to Comment
    2. Joel

      Maybe the workers were fired because of Soda Stream’s falling revenues. Which falling revenues may or may not be related to a BDS campaign against the company.

      Reply to Comment
      • Slevdi

        The article quotes expected revenue up 15% and profits up 3%. If true, then business for SodaStream seems to be improved by the BDS activity, not diminished.

        Reply to Comment
      • Reza Lustig

        Maybe I’m secretly the reanimated zombie of Marshal Tito.

        Weren’t Zionists going on, in response to the Sodastream opposition, about how ineffective it was and how Sodastream was still doing good business? If so, then it would be more logical to suggest that it would have more to do with the well-deserved animosity Israel and the occupation are getting from the international community over “Operation Protective Edge.”

        That, and the selfish nature of corporate executives, and their kneejerk refusal to ever cut their own wages instead of their workers’.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Reza Lustig

      Waiting for Arb to show her “center-left” credentials by telling us what she thinks of this blatant abusive treatment of workers by management.

      Then again, Zionism, even when it was more “left-wing,” was more about making sure Israel’s Jewish population got special treatment than promotion of equality. I remember reading Leopold Trepper’s (The Great Game, out of print but a few copies on Amazon) account of how his attempts as an activist in Palestine to win union recognition for Arab workers was halted by the Histadrut’s racism.

      Reply to Comment
      • Sonnenuhr

        These workers were earning wages equal to Israeli workers which is seven times what the Palestinian average wage in Palestinian areas.

        They stopped work because they did not like the food which they were served. They were offered an alternative and refused it and did not go back to work. Management exercised their rights and sacked them for an illegal work stoppage. The Palestinians acted very foolishly. Management acted cold heatedly as is their right when it comes to business.

        Reply to Comment
        • shmuel

          Which alternative, Sonnenuhr? Did you read the article?

          Reply to Comment
          • Sonnenuhr

            Yes, I read the article, they were offered a reasonable alternative, similar to meals which I have eaten many times myself. If they did not like it, they could have eaten the Schnitzel and chicken, or eaten nothing. They had no right to stop working and management had the right to terminate them.

            You might remember back in April UPS canned 250 workers for a one and half hour work stoppage over the termination of another employee.

            This is what one commentator said in response to the firing:

            “Good for UPS for standing up for what should be standard work requirements: Follow your contract, work hard, or get fired. Disrupting the work force in this way is not the appropriate way to handle most internal issues, unless you are willing and able to deal with the consequences of your actions.”

            The problem is that Palestinians never think of the consequences before acting and then whine when they suffer the natural consequences of their actions.

            Reply to Comment
          • Vicky

            No. They were not offered an alternative. They were told to eat the food provided for their BREAKFAST, which is a separate meal and meant to fortify them for a day’s fasting. (If they’d eaten it as suggested, what would they have had at breakfast time, or are two meals a day too luxurious for an Arab to expect?) In no way was that food going to be adequate for someone who works mostly on their feet for long shifts. I used to work twelve to fourteen-hour days on hospital wards and if someone had suggested that I satiate myself on hummus and a shared scrap of schnitzel at the end of it I would have thought they were joking. That could make someone ill. Had a worker become faint because of the lack of food, perhaps they would have been terminated too, because sick leave/general sympathy for fainting employees is also in short supply in settlement companies that spend their time cheerfully exploiting a captive labour force whose members have very few job prospects.

            “The problem is that Palestinians never think of the consequences before acting and then whine…”

            Rather than talking like a prim-lipped Victorian schoolmarm with misbehaving charges, which is easy enough to do, let’s see you work in that factory on that wage with that fast and that food before you start expecting other people to meekly accept those conditions.

            Reply to Comment
          • Sonnenuhr

            It was the breakfast meal. Management describes the event differently from the one sided story on 972:

            “A spokesman for SodaStream, Ben Thein, said workers had used the iftar meal as a “pretext to stir up a violent scene and disrupt production at the factory”.

            He said adequate food had been served that night, including two choices of meat, four choices of sides and a complete salad bar.

            He said the workers had become aggressive towards management.

            “Incitement included threatening language and behaviour, including pushing managers,” Mr Thein said.

            “SodaStream has zero tolerance towards any employee who practises violence or incites violence.”

            Maybe the Palestinians should try apologizing to the managers.

            Reply to Comment
          • Helen Munro

            Okay show us the video of the violence on your security cameras. If you didnt pay some misguided Hollywood actress $$$$$$ to advertise your product, maybe you could use the money on more food & better pay for your workers. They had Soda stream on sale at a local applience store, they were selling them at half price! I would take one if they gave it to me for free!!!!

            Reply to Comment
    4. Dr hadeel bashir

      How immature arrogant attitude of israelis … i feel pity for their mind set . So evil

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel