Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Welcome to Hebron, where the rule of law is nonexistent

It took the police nearly three hours to reach a Palestinian’s home in Hebron after it had been fired on. When the police arrived, they asked the victim to do their job for them. 

By Yesh Din (written by Yossi Gurvitz)

Issa Amro, a resident of Hebron, is a noted activist who is often targeted for harassment by both the army and the settlers. He recently made it to the headlines in Israel (Heb) after IDF soldiers stormed his house during an Iftar dinner, choosing it as their training site. Yesh Din has already covered this phenomenon, which allows the IDF to show the Palestinians who’s boss. In Amro’s case, one suspects this harassment was anything but accidental, and was intended to intimidate an activist who gives the occupation forces a major headache.

Amro has other troubles. He is out of favor with the settlers, as he is one of the organizers of protests against the closing of Shuhada Street. Remember Baruch Goldstein’s massacre in Hebron? Following the massacre, the IDF decided that for security reasons, a main road in Palestinian Hebron must be closed. Some sort of occupation logic, I assume. A massacre took place? Make sure to punish the group which has just been massacred. That’ll be sure to deter the population which supports the murderer.

Be that as it may, several days ago, as Amro was sitting down for the Iftar dinner, there was a sudden loud noise. The guests were quick to take cover – Hebronites are well-drilled. A quick survey found a bullet casing nearby, which indicates a shooting. Amro went to the military checkpoint near his house, and spoke to the soldier there, asking him to call his captain. The soldier refused. Amro informed him his house was shot at. The soldier remained apathetic: “I don’t care, call the police.” As a common Israeli soldier, this one was unaware of his duty to defend Palestinians, including the duty to secure a crime scene.

Amro went back home, called the police, and they said they were on their way. Twenty minutes later, he called again. They were still on their way. And indeed, just 150 minutes after the second phone call, a police car moseyed up to the crime scene. The police were quick to show outstanding professionalism by asking Amro where the shot came from. Amro, sadly not a ballistic expert, reminded them this was their job. They said they’d do it.

A few minutes later, Amro joined the cops on their way to the police station in Kiryat Arba. That’s when the incident took a particularly Hebronic twist: a well-known settler and notorious felon blocked the road, informing the cops that “Issa won’t pass here.” Instead of informing the settler he isn’t going to order them around, the cops chose the path of better discretion and went down another road, which quite amused Amro.

Finally, Amro made his statement. The cops promised to return to the crime scene so as to actually examine it. So far, they haven’t. We shall patiently wait for the police to close the case without arresting any suspects. A reminder: 84 percent of cases are closed due to police negligence, due to the “unknown perpetrator clause.”

To sum things up: a house was shot up during a holiday dinner. A soldier did not know – or pretended not to know – his duty, nor did he hear the shot. A police force needed close to three hours to reach the scene. The police ask the victim to do their job for them, and later allow a settler to block their way and meekly turn to another road.

Welcome to occupied Hebron, where the rule of law crawls to die.

Written by Yossi Gurvitz in his capacity as a blogger for Yesh Din, Volunteers for Human Rights. A version of this post was first published on Yesh Din’s blog.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. I vaguely recall that the street was closed several years after Goldstein, during the 2nd Intifada, but I may be wrong, or it might have been partially closed after Goldstein.

      In any case, to storm a lived house for training is pure colonialism. If there is no legal bar to that, there will be no rule of law on lesser matters. Which may be part of the point of said storming. The settler transit veto simply shows how settlers have evolved a kind of micro control over local IDF–which is strange, given that the IDF has raised its constitutional standing by either ignoring or delaying implementation of High Court orders. A strange country you have.

      Reply to Comment
      • Jan

        When Goldstein murdered 29 Muslims at prayer in the mosque it was not the Jews of Hebron who were punished. It was the Palestinians, some relatives of the murdered men, who were put under curfew while Shuhada St. Palestinian owned shops were shut down. The Jews could walk down the streets without a problem while the Palestinians who had no connection to the heinous crime were shut up in their homes.

        Today a plaque in honor of Baruch Goldstein in Hebron commemorates the terrorism commited by this Jewish terrorist.

        Reply to Comment
        • The Trespasser

          >When Goldstein murdered 29 Muslims at prayer in the mosque it was not the Jews of Hebron who were punished.

          Oh, so now you do support collective punishment.

          >It was the Palestinians, some relatives of the murdered men, who were put under curfew while Shuhada St. Palestinian owned shops were shut down.

          You make it sound like Shuhada st. was closed because Goldstein massacred 29 Muslims.
          Nonsense, obviously.

          The Patriarch Cave massacre took place in February, 1994, Shuhada st. was closed in October, 2000.

          Should I also explain why the street was closed or you are able to figure it out by yourself?

          >Today a plaque in honor of Baruch Goldstein in Hebron commemorates the terrorism committed by this Jewish terrorist.

          Yeah, such a shame. But really nothing much compared to numerous plaques of honour commemorating Arab, Palestinian and otherwise, terrorists.

          Reply to Comment
          • David T.

            “Yeah, such a shame. But really nothing much compared to numerous plaques of honour commemorating Arab, Palestinian and otherwise, terrorists.”

            Who would have thought that most streets, places in Israel are named first after fascist lover Jebotinsky and second after terrorist Begin? Or that Lehi and Irgun members get military service ribbons, especially considering that Lehi wanted an alliance with Nazi Germany during the war, proposing a totalitarian state in Palestine?

            Would you – a self declared expert of Arab culture – therefore conclude that fascism and terrorism are part of Jewish culture? Or do your racist generalizations only apply to Arabs?

            Reply to Comment
    2. David T.

      “In any case, to storm a lived house for training is pure colonialism.”

      Not necessary. Some Germans did this in their own country against people of different religion.

      Reply to Comment
      • Well, you are right, but I was thinking of the present case only. The point is that when authority storms a house as an exercise (and I don’t think that exactly was happening in Germany), one cannot expect this authority to uphold the rule of law for such people generally.

        And, of course, that Jews endured such things is no license for a State to practice similarly. The rule of law is of the moment, not the past.

        Reply to Comment
        • Haifawi

          One would have hoped that the Third Amendment to the US Constitution would have lost its relevance.

          Reply to Comment
          • The Trespasser

            One would also hope for some proof that the “training” actually ever took place, exactly as one would hope for any proof that Al Jabari did sent a “peace offer” to Mr. Baskin.

            Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel