I must admin I didn’t understand your response. Could you clarify it? What did I exactly apologize for? In what meaning do you use the word Zionist as an adjective?

Where are you from?

So we can compare the suffering of the settlers as documented by sites like Arutz Sheva with the suffering of Palestinians as documented by B’Tselem etc. In the meantime, impartial observers provide us with restaurant reviews. Although I must admit that my rosy views of restaurant reviews are in part based on the fact that I could never afford to visit the reviewed restaurants and that I never read scathing critiques of those reviews, so for all I know, they are paragons of objectivity. Also, in the few cases I had time and money to check for myself, the food was good.

I don’t understand your question. When I speak of a group of people that indulge in violence – I call them terrorists. When I speak of a group of people that indulge in building houses and raising families in disputed areas in Israel – I call them settlers.

The UN has proven its bias, corruption and overall uselessness in countless cases. To me, the opinion of the UN has as much moral weight as the opinion of Hamas.

The international law is something everyone quotes and few truly understand. I’m no lawyer, but there is no set of “International laws” upon which you can decide what’s legal and what’s not. It’s much more complex than that and your statements about this or that being against international law are oversimplifications.

You don’t have to buy my reluctance to automatically accuse Jews without any evidence. If that suits your view and makes you feel better – then go ahead, just don’t lecture others about moral standards.

The Arabs are people like all of us. They are not animals to be provoked into violence and they should take responsibility for their actions. You can provoke me into cursing you, punching you, maybe even doing something worse as a personal vengeance. You could not provoke me into planning an attack and massacring an entire family, exploding in a bus full of unfamiliar people or murdering an infant with a sniper rifle. These acts are not provoked, they are performed to achieve political means. Nothing, and I repeat – NOTHING – justifies them. This sort of violence, it’s justification and glorification is a social sickness of our Arab neighbours and should be a source of shame.

So – if someone building a house on an empty land (often paid for) or a graffiti on a building – makes you want to sharpen your axe and chop some random Jew’s head off “in retaliation” – you should seriously consider professional treatment.

So when you look the web for events – you only get the point of view of the editors of the largest sites. Other sites (with other agendas – and therefore with different information) are labelled as Pro-Settler, as if that makes them less reliable.

“It is true that Palestinian sources are sometimes given to exaggeration”. Jews stealing organs? Using wild boars? Plan to destroy the Dome of rock? Spreading AIDS and drugs? The “massacre” in Jenin? Countless staged events (Pallywood)? You can claim that Israeli sources (as much as any other) are not always accurate. But there’s still a difference between that and a routinely use of blatant lies and fabrications.

violence and agricultural sabotage by settlers is many orders of magnitude larger than similar acts against the settlers, or

unlike Palestinian villagers, settlers are uniquely inept in using web media to show their plights.

The second alternative is highly unlikely. For example, Arutz Sheva has large staff and quite high technical quality, while Palestinian web resources like MAAN look to be published by scant staff with quite poor knowledge of English.

It is true that Palestinian sources are sometimes given to exaggeration, although I do not see that they do it more frequently than followers of other Abrahamic religions. One possible exaggeration is attributing the activity of wild boars to the settlers. After all, they seem to be indigenous to the region. According to http://natureisrael.com/mammals.html :

Wild boar are perhaps Israel’s most obnoxious large mammal, a lumbering creature renowned for its grumpy temper.

Because no photo is provided, and no indication if the creatures are quadrupedal or bipedal, it could be an oblique reference to settlers who are renown for grumpy temper and also may reach “the weight in exceess of 200 lb, especially males” and “damage crops”.

Not a single Palestinian act of violence is justfied by any settlement. Not a single bombing. Without doubt, the failure of the PO \ Hamas to prevent all violence (not really unauthorized under its own terms) is effectively active policy towards violence. The ideology of the vanguard terrorists is attaches to the Palestinian leadership. This ideology is religiously based. Claiming the terrorists autonomous is irrelevant, as Hamas and PO could interdict them, but does not. With each bombing, each rocket, more confrontation will arise.

Of course the de facto State policy is to expand via settlers, that is why we left Sinai and Gaza. Just like Pink-Washing, this is Withdrawal-Washing – we hide our expansionist and land grabbing policy by giving land away.