Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

UN refugee official: Deportation of Africans unlikely

An optimistic proposal, inspired by an interview with the UN refugee agency’s man in Israel.

Last Friday, a couple of days after the south Tel Aviv riot, I interviewed William Tall, representative in Israel of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and came away thinking that there is a way to settle the crisis decently, which I didn’t think there was before. Not that I believe Israel will settle it decently, just that there is a solution that would be fair to the African refugees, to the Israelis in south Tel Aviv, and to the State of Israel.

(Point of information: The current rate of Africans crossing from Sinai into Israel is about 1,500 a month, the same as last year’s. The 2,000-3,000 monthly figure I quoted last week was what Tall told me in late March, at the end of the “spike” in refugees seen from late 2011 into first months of 2012. Since then, the rate of arrivals has gone back to the average monthly rate for 2011.)

A solution to the refugee crisis has to 1) stem the flow of Eritreans, Sudanese and other Africans arriving, who in nearly all cases have no other country to continue on to afterward; 2) treat the refugees decently; and 3) relieve the pressure on south Tel Aviv.

Tall says the border fence Israel is building, and which can reasonably be expected to be finished by the end of the year, should bring down the numbers of new refugees ”dramatically.” He also says that once the camp for 10,000 refugees is built in the Negev, it could legitimately be offered as a refuge – in lieu of work permits – to Africans who enter the country even after the fence is completed. Thus, once the fence and the refugee camp are up and running (construction of the latter, however, is barely underway), Africans would know that even if they got through the fence, they would not be allowed to work here, which should deter the great majority from making the extraordinarily hellish, expensive trip through the Sinai to Israel in the first place.

Tall says that if Israel sets up a border fence with crossings where officials grant fair hearings to people’s appeals for asylum, and operated the refugee camp as an open, properly-run facility, Israel would be within its rights under international refugee treaties (signed by Israel itself) to deny newcomers the right to work.

“We’re not against the fence, and if they operate the camp in a proper way - good luck to the camp,” said Tall. He also said the rate of refugees coming here and their concentration in poor neighborhoods like Hatikva Quarter, where the riot took place, was ”a genuine and reasonable concern of the Israeli government.”

Whether Israel would give fair hearing to asylum requests at the border fence, and whether it would run the camp properly, with refugees being free to come and go, is, of course, another story. But it does seem at least possible to drastically reduce, if not altogether stop,  the number of refugees coming to this country - which now stands at upwards of 60,000 and which could grow indefinitely if nothing is done - without turning them away or denying them the means to get food, shelter, clothing and health care.

At the same time, though, the refugees who are here now have to be allowed to work. The legitimate fear that letting them work will encourage more to come should be allayed by the fence and, later, the refugee camp. Meanwhile, they can’t be left destitute for obvious moral as well as practical reasons – it forces them into crime. They can be given jobs that otherwise would go to Chinese, Thais and Eastern European guest workers. This would naturally distribute the refugees around the country, relieving the social pressure on south Tel Aviv.

In my opinion, Israel should rebuild a lot of the mobile home parks it built for the Ethiopian and Russian immigrants in the early 1990s and house tens of thousands of Africans there. I wrote last week that they should be absorbed by cities, towns, kibbutzim and moshavim while acknowledging that Israeli communities would never agree to it. But given the emergency in south Tel Aviv and various other poor neighborhoods, I think the government might agree to pay for mobile home parks.

Regarding the suddenly popular idea to deport the refugees, most of whom are from Eritrea, back to their home countries, Tall said that what he hears about Eritrea “makes North Korea sound like Alice in Wonderland.” He doubts the government would go through with the threats, citing a remark last year by Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon, no less, that Israel cannot send refugees back to a death trap like Eritrea.

But regarding the South Sudanese, who number up to 3,000 and whom the goverment is determined to deport, Tall said that if Israel first gives a proper hearing to each of them and makes no move against anyone whose safety or life would genuinely be endangered back home, Israel is within its rights to send the others back. He pointed out that about 800 South Sudanese have gone back voluntarily and another 100 or 200 want to.

“If you have somebody from Abyei [a border area between South Sudan and Sudan where there's been terrible fighting], you don’t want to send him back. But if, say, he comes from a family connected to the government with a house in Juba [South Sudan's capital], then that’s a different story,” said Tall.

Still, the South Sudanese are a maximum of 3,000 people; the Eritreans and Sudanese, who are about 50,000 combined, cannot be deported because they would be in grave danger back in their countries. In the case of Sudan, it is also an enemy country that has no relations with Israel, and is certainly not going to oblige it by taking refugees off its hands.

The statements by government ministers that Israel is seeking “third countries” to accept refugees, possibly with inducements of money and/or arms – this has been talked about for years, but no third country has come forward because they all have their own refugees and don’t want Israel’s too. ”There’s nothing new happening in that direction,” said Tall.

I looked at the UN’s figures for the worldwide movement of refugees last year, and it seemed to me that Israel was now taking in a much higher proportion of them, compared to its population, than any Western country. “I hear this a lot from people in the government,” said Tall. “If you look at the cumulative total over time, refugees make up less than one percent of Israel’s population. European countries have taken in much larger proportions than that.”

So we’re not so unique in being “flooded” by Third World refugees. As a tiny, prosperous country in a poor region, and a country that can be reached by land from Africa, we may be uniquely exposed to the world’s greatest pool of refugees – but the fence and refugee camp should narrow that exposure “dramatically.”

Israel is going to have many tens of thousands of Africans inside its borders for a long time, maybe indefinitely, and chances are that a few thousand additional Africans will continue to arrive year after year. If those who’ve arrived before the completion of the fence and camp are allowed to work , and they’re not living on top of one another in a handful of poor Jewish (and one or two Arab) family neighborhoods - if instead they are spread out, with many if not most living in mobile home parks for working refugees, then it seems to me this crisis can be solved in a decent, mutually satisfactory way.

Will it happen? With this government and with dangerous demagogues like Knesset members Miri Regev, Danny Danon and Michael Ben-Ari, I wouldn’t bet on it.

But on the other hand, if Israel can’t deport these refugees – and to deport someone, there has to be a country on the other end to accept him, and so far such a country hasn’t been found – then Israel will have no choice but to learn to live with these people as best it can.

William Tall, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ man in Israel, is convinced there is genuine hope. So who am I, who is anyone, to say there isn’t?

Related:
How mainstream Israeli politicians sparked the Tel Aviv race riot
How I survived a Tel Aviv mob attack
After race riots, Israelis celebrate Shavuot with African kids
Arab leaders in Israel side with consensus on African immigrants
Israel’s African problem: An interview with Mark Regev

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. caden

      Israel taking instructions from the UN is like the hen taking instructions from the fox

      Reply to Comment
    2. Louis

      Now that I think of it… Israel should just shut up and suck it up. Accept that migration is part of contemporary life on our globe and work to receive migrants in a humane and proper way… The reason Israel fears migrants is because they are “different” from “US”… we have to say: “So what!”

      Reply to Comment
    3. mp

      Louis i agree. if there were truly no space for immigrants, then why is israel constantly recruiting the world’s jews to move there? i am certain if 1500 destitute jews arrived on israel’s shores every month they would find room for them.
      is it just me, or does it sometimes seem as if israel thinks that jews are better than other groups of people?

      Reply to Comment
    4. caden

      Louis, MP, Hw many African refugees on your block, your town, your country. And why should Israel “suck it up”. Who made that rule.

      Reply to Comment
    5. mp

      @caden
      And you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt. deut 10:19

      Reply to Comment
    6. Aaron the Fascist Troll

      If this guy’s right that most of them would be in real danger if deported, then we’re stuck with an awful situation. Trailer parks might the least bad solution, but it’s still very bad. It’s a solution to the crisis, but not to the problem.
       
      Spreading the migrants throughout the country is a good idea both for south Tel Aviv and for Israel as a whole. Worse than having a large population of African migrants is having them concentrated in a single geographic place.
       
      All the natural political and bureaucratic forces will push towards making these migrants’ stay permanent, despite the wishes of Israelis. *That* is what we have to consciously, continuously resist. We have to constantly remind ourselves that they are going to leave, not today and probably not tomorrow, but when there’s a humane way, they will leave.

      Reply to Comment
    7. Really

      They will be sent to Gaza or Lebanon at the first opportunity and the UN scumbags won’t be able to stop it.

      Reply to Comment
    8. Larry’s proposal of equating these immigrants with work visa temporary immigrants makes much sense. You would have to make a concerted effort to place these immigrants in compatible jobs; but you get to reduce the number of termporary workers you import.
      .
      But this will generate the next stage, in a decade or less: children will be born, their home will be in Israel, and the parents will likely never have viable return to their homelands. So Israel will have to create a citizenless class across generations, or grant citizenship. If the fence indeed prevents most entry in the future, a grant of citizenship would ultimately be less painful in the long haul.
      .
      If you concentrate them in camps, their birth rate will be higher, and you will have the strange equivalent of a (small) Palestinian camp in Lebanon. Dispersing them via a work program will be painfully lonely; they will be living lives with no apparent advance, in a country where, at least for a while, they are told they should not be there at all. Leaving their homeland, they have already lost much. But some will find smiles and caring.
      .
      Aaron,
      .
      Your analysis is neither fascist nor troll-like.

      Reply to Comment
    9. Greg, I think that if the fence succeeds in stabilizing the number of refugees in the country, then those here should be allowed to apply for citizenship, and if they’re law-abiding, productive citizens, they should be granted it after some number of years. (This is my idea, but Israel would have to be a very different country than it is to accept it.) About the dispersal of them through the country, they would still be in communities of hundreds or thousands with freedom to travel where they want – why should they be lonely? Meanwhile, their kids are going to school with Israelis and they’re getting all the social benefits. Even without the chance for citizenship, there’s no comparison between that and a Palestinian refugee camp.

      Reply to Comment
    10. Larry, you’re evidently assuming that they are, just as those who want to expel them claim they are, nothing but ‘economic migrants’. If, in fact, they are refugees, then they will not want to stay, but will want to go home, as soon as the fighting stops and assuming the new govt does not have some sort of racial, religious or political animus against them.

      Reply to Comment
    11. Jacob

      Hi,

      I feel the scant treatment, or even implicit acceptance, Larry and others on the Left have given the idea of a “camp” in the Negev, is worrying. It opens a whole can of worms about moral and human rights, and the morality of an immigration-deterrence regime that might appear, such as Australia’s. I have contrasted the two situations in my blog: http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/wrong-way-go-back-israeli-left/

      Cheers

      Reply to Comment
    12. Jacob, it seems you’re saying that every refugee who comes to Israel and can’t safely be deported elsewhere should be allowed to work. I’m afraid that would be too much of an incentive to too many refugees to come here. But I understand what you’re saying about the refugee camp in the Negev. Ideally, it wouldn’t be necessary. If the fence brings the numbers of refugees down greatly, maybe it would be possible to bag the refugee camp and just let them all work. But I don’t know if that’s possible, and in my opinion, ultra-liberal or not, getting the refugee influx under control is the number one priority in this whole thing.

      Reply to Comment
    13. max

      RB “If, in fact, they are refugees, then they will not want to stay”
      Really? And your proof is, for example, with the hundred of thousands of Ex-Yugoslav refugees across Europe?

      Reply to Comment
    14. Larry,
      .
      I think dispersal, under the work visa quota system (that is, depressing the work visas issued for others, external to Israel) is the best option by far, IF the State directs them to such jobs. But there will be racial exclusion, which is what I was hinting at in “lonely.” I know it will not be ubiquitous; there are good people everywhere. But, after these events, which seem to be continuing, the hostility will be real.
      .
      I think the camp a very bad idea. You will see the population give birth, instilling more anger as the State is paying for their existence (in some fashion). Once quaranteened in this way, resistence to dispersal within the State will just grow. As I said before, you end up with a Palestinian like camp found in Lebanon. The only viable hope is your work visa dispersal proposal. All else breeds more racial hatred, later.

      Reply to Comment
    15. Greg, neither Jewish nor Arab neighorhoods want hundreds and thousands of African refugees moving in, so if we trust only to work visas to redistribute them, we’re going to replicate the situation in S. Tel Aviv all over the country.

      Reply to Comment
    16. Joel

      Obviously, allowing the migrants to stay creates a ‘home base’ that will more attract prospective migrants.

      When MP wakes up one morning and sees a band of Gypsies camped out in his back yard, I give 30 seconds before he calls 911.

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel