7 comments for ”Top pundit for Sheldon Adelson’s free daily – on PM Office payroll“

    
  1. This is what happens when a government has no opposition. Netanyahu is merely doing what comes naturally to him – cementing his authority in every possible way. He knows that his propaganda newspaper is the most widely read rag in the country, and he’s just making sure its message is clear, that’s all (what better way than to use tax payer’s money to grease the propaganda wheels??) Netanyahu has grand visions of a Putinocracy or a Berlusconi Republic (“Silvio, my friend”). And in 10 years time we will wake up and, like the Russians and the Italians today, ask: How the hell did we allow this guy to rule us for so long???

  2. 
  3. I am not a ‘smolanit’ but everybody knows that Dror Eydar is just a little slave of power. nothing to do with real journalism.

    danny, berlusconi is gone and now monti is in power. netanyahu, on the contrary, is still there and is building up his dreamed fascist state day after day

  4. 
  5. Thanks for this great piece, Noam. One small correction: the distribution of Yisrael Hayom started in July 2007, not 2011.

    http://www.israelhayom.com/site/about.php

  6. 
  7. I do not like those flaks, but I do not understand what makes the described event fishy.

    Mister X works for a newspaper, and he also gets a part time consulting job from entity Y. Mister X gets a fee and on his day job writes very enthusiastically about entity Y.

    The newspaper is basically created to write enthusiastically about entity Y.

    It is hard to see who is influencing whom in this episode. Mister X is actually performing some work for the fee, and I dare say that a randomly selected BA of liberal arts would not be able to copy/paste phrases cited by Noam without dissolving in laughter or getting drunk (If I could get 50,000 shekels for that, I would copy/paste from editorials of Israel Harel who is very patriotic and would not mind, and of course I would not touch any more originally looking phrases as they may be a bit risky; however, I am not sure if I could finish such a job due to hazards described above.)

    Mr. X is apparently not biased in his opinionating by the fee from entity Y because he was specifically hired by his newspaper to have such a bias. So the causal chain may be that after proving his mettle as a newspaper flack, Mr. X can also provide some verbiage for the entity. Makes me wonder how to get noticed by the Foreign Affairs Ministry to write for them.

  8. 
  9. I am trying to complete this paragraph of Mrss. Medad and Pollak: “THE MEDIA has the ability to weaken democracy by permitting non-elected elites to become dominant.”

    … For example, an unelected bussiness tycoon can shamelessly package sport commentaries, gardening news etc. with toxic propaganda to make further his hobby as a kingmaker, thus media provides an additional channel for to converting power of money into political power.

    As I resumed reading, I discovered that the actual completion was much more original. Namely there exists some leviathan-like creature called “the Left” that absolutely unfairly produces newspapers read by a minority even though it receives votes only from a minority. Since English is my second language, I checked “unfair” in the dictionary: “disproportionate; undue; beyond what is proper or fitting”. [This sentence was contributed by Dr. Dror, since I studied logic in my university years, I have some idea what Dror did not study.]

    Reading Dr. Dror presents similar hazards as trying to emulate his writing. However, you guys at 972 magazine are made of stern stuff. Could someone interview Dr. Dror and get explanation how Israel should operate as a FAIR country? No criticism, no polemics, just explanation how Israel would look, media, courts, NGOs, parties, would Dr. Dror had Hashem’s ear for an hour or so?

    In logic it is called “model”, the idea is to check if “fairness”, as conceived by Dr. Dror, is possible, and if it is, what would it take.

    Part of the puzzle is that Polish right wing makes very similar complaints. However, they lost two elections in a row, so when they talk about “advantage” then some advantage, fair or unfair, exists.

  10.  
  11. Good to see Sheldon Adelson supporting Israel!



Leave a comment