Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Public demands social justice, gov't prefers to attack democracy

UPDATE: Since this post was published on Sunday morning, a ministerial committee approved two bill proposals that seek to limit the funding of human rights organizations. Read more here.

After a summer featuring hundreds of thousands of Israelis demonstrating in the streets for social justice legislation, the Knesset is now finally back from recess. But social justice legislation isn’t on the agenda. In its stead, the coalition has gone back to promoting its wave of anti-democratic legislation. Is this coalition government out of touch with the people’s will?

By Hagai El-Ad

Right up until the eve of the summer social justice protests, the coalition government was diligently at work promoting a wave of anti-democratic legislation: the Boycott Law, the Acceptance to Communities Law, the Nakba Law, and the initiative to establish parliamentary inquiry committees into the work of Israeli human rights organizations. It seemed that almost daily, the Knesset was setting new lows of extreme nationalism, racism, and a dangerous willingness to tamper with the rules of the democratic game.

That pre-summer anti-democratic agenda was unacceptable, whether it had the public’s support or not. In a meaningful democracy, one does not vote on the fundamental principles, nor are they subject to the tyranny of the majority. Still, to what extent this agenda actually enjoyed the public’s support is a question that has yet to be answered.

But then, just as the Knesset went into recess, Israel’s social justice summer began. Protests swept up hundreds of thousands of Israelis for months. In contrast with the legislative agenda that preceded the summer, these demonstrations were not in support of the pursuit of imaginary domestic enemies, nor had those hundreds of thousands jumped on board racist legislation. Rather, these were Israelis for social justice, for advancing equality for everyone who lives here, in health, education, housing, employment. Israelis spoke in a clear voice, calling for social justice legislation, and for our legislators to be occupied with solving the real problems that afflict our lives here, rather than waste their time, at our expense, on promoting legislation that undermines the democratic foundations of our complex lives here.

The summer passed, the Knesset’s recess was finally over. Hardly a week or two passed. Has the Knesset opted to now devote its time to what had preoccupied the public all summer, or rather return to anti-democratic-business-as-usual?

So far, the answer is quite clear, and it is a slap in the public’s face. Social legislation? The coalition votes against. Anti-democratic legislation? The coalition is vigorously pursuing this agenda, as if the summer never happened.

A week ago, the coalition thwarted all social bills proposed in the plenum, including Basic Law: Social Rights. The demands that the public voiced over the summer were bluntly rejected. In contrast, anti-democratic bills are promoted and supported: threats to the Supreme Court’s independence; legislation limiting freedom of expression described by the  Speaker of the Knesset as a “constitutional onslaught from within the Knesset”; initiatives supported by the Prime Minister to silence human rights organizations; and more.

This is the price of such a government, a price paid by all Israelis: continuing to shoulder the unfair costs of bad socioeconomic policies, now along with the additional costs of the undoing of our democracy.

Hagai El-Ad is the Executive Director of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Richard Witty

      Keep at it. Keep making common cause around social/economic issues that cross ethnic lines: Palestinian Israeli, Sephardi Israeli, Ashkenazi Israeli.

      Start new parties and participate more effectively in existing.

      Non-nationalist parties like Hadash or Avram Burg’s proposals.

      Keep the content on social issues, so that new governance can emerge.

      To the extent that Israel/Palestine is the subject of dissent, security will be the primary basis of electoral response, and that will be towards risk-aversion, thereby electing likud.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Louis

      Is anyone keeping score here? If this were a boxing match it seems that the Israeli Government has democracy on the ropes, bleeding from its mouth, nose and eyes and about to go down for an 8 count… the problem is that the ref. seems to have allowed the Israeli Government to use lead weighted boxing gloves and to have spiked Democracy’s water bottle…(I hate to use the boxing analogy it is so violent, but so too is the Occupation so it is fitting).

      Reply to Comment
    3. RichardNYC

      @LOUIS
      Yeah, I remember when the Ayatollahs limited foreign funding for Iranian human rights NGO’s. THAT’S when everyone knew it wasn’t a democracy.

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel