Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Stepped up Israeli harassment leads to clashes in Abu Dis

The presence of Israeli security forces around Al Quds University in Abu Dis has led to clashes with students twice in the past week. Israeli forces, who have used rubber-coated bullets and tear gas, are trying to provoke the students, the university’s executive vice president claims.

File photo of Israeli border policemen in East Jerusalem (Acitivestills.org)

Yesterday, while I was teaching my 9:30 a.m. composition class at Al Quds University in Abu Dis, I heard the crack of rubber-coated bullets being fired outside. A few of my students jumped in their seats. Eyes wide, they looked at me for a cue. I continued teaching, although I saw students running past the window and the hallway next to my classroom was soon full of students coughing from the tear gas they’d inhaled outside.

As I was inside teaching, I didn’t see firsthand how the clashes began. But according to Ma’an News Agency, “[an] Israeli border police patrol stopped and searched several students at the main gate of the university in Abu Dis, inspecting identity cards and detaining several students for over an hour.”

When Israeli forces then tried to enter the university, which is located in Area B, staff stopped them. As the staff is unarmed, it is safe to assume that they used nonviolent means to prevent the armed Israelis from going on campus. Israeli forces then fired tear gas and rubber coated bullets at the school. Dozens of students suffered from gas inhalation; Ma’an also reported that eight were treated at the Abu Dis Emergency Center after they were hit by rubber-coated bullets.

This was the second time in less than a week that Israeli soldiers came to campus, causing clashes to break out at Al Quds University. Last Wednesday morning, as I walked in a side gate around 9:30 a.m., I heard rubber-coated bullets being fired. Inside the campus, I found students choking and coughing from tear gas and crowding the hallways of a building as they sought refuge from the clashes between heavily armed soldiers and a small number of youth who had nothing but stones.

Speaking to Ma’an, Al Quds University Executive Vice President Imad Abu Keshik said, “Israeli forces claim that they are stationed near [the] Al Quds University campus to oversee construction and maintenance work on the separation wall.” But I’m here at least four days a week and I pass the separation barrier on my way to and from campus, and I have not seen maintenance or construction of the portion of the wall that is near the university.

Abu Keshik sums it up: “Israeli forces are trying to provoke students and create a sense of instability around the campus.”

As someone who lived in Abu Dis for a semester and became well-acquainted with the village and its rhythms, I’ve seen that things often go like this: an army jeep enters the village, driving along a main road towards the university. Alarmed by the provocative intrusion of an occupying army, local boys and sometimes students throw stones at the armored vehicle. Soldiers stop the jeep, get out, and then “defend” themselves — which they wouldn’t “need” to do if they hadn’t entered in the first place.

***

It’s not just the university and its students that are under increasing pressure. Traveling between Bethlehem, Abu Dis, Jerusalem and Ramallah in recent weeks, it has been apparent that Israel has tightened the checkpoints in those areas. There is an increased military presence at some checkpoints that are usually only partially or barely manned. Soldiers seem to be stopping more people and inspecting more cars than usual. Palestinians and internationals who move through and in and out of the West Bank on a daily basis also report an increased military presence and a surge in flying checkpoints.

An IDF checkpoint in the West Bank [illustrative photo, by Ahmad Al-Bazz/ Activestills.org)

On my way from Abu Dis to Bethlehem on a recent Saturday, soldiers stopped the service taxi I was riding in at a checkpoint and proceeded to thoroughly search the vehicle and my bags. They did not ask for ID once I spoke English to them in an American accent and told them that I’m from Florida. However, my privileges did not extend to the people around me. The driver and the two other passengers — all Palestinian men — were told to hand over their IDs. The soldiers took them and walked away.

We then sat for approximately 40 minutes in the hot sun, the soldiers insisting that we keep both the doors and windows closed. I was ill (no, I shouldn’t have been traveling in my condition); when the driver understood just how sick I was, he got out of the boiling van and began pleading with the soldiers for a little bit of water. The soldiers, who had a cooler full of ice-cold water next to them on the bench, told him that if we could find a cup in the service taxi, they would give me some.

But we didn’t have any glasses in the service taxi and so the driver pushed some more. Finally the soldiers relented and gave him a cup of water, which he brought to me.

In the end, the soldier returned the ID cards to the driver and other passengers and we were all free to go. The purpose of the stop and detainment in the sweltering heat? It seemed to be nothing but harassment.

***

As a journalist who happens to hold a blue ID, the people around me expect me to have some insight into these events. They keep asking me why the Israelis keep coming to the university. And why have the checkpoints gotten tighter? And why the flying checkpoints? Is it connected to the holidays?

Unfortunately, I don’t have any answers. Our students are just people who want to get an education and who hope for a better future. They want to graduate and find jobs and have families. The overwhelming majority of the Palestinians moving about the West Bank and traveling to and from Jerusalem are just trying to go about their lives.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Danny

      “They keep asking me why the Israelis keep coming to the university. And why have the checkpoints gotten tighter? And why the flying checkpoints? Is it connected to the holidays?”

      My theory is that when the Israelis feel pressured by tightening international sanctions (such as the E.U. settlement boycott due to take effect soon), they lash out at the most vulnerable target they can in a kind of state-sanctioned ‘price tag’ action. When the noose loosens, so do the raids, arrests and checkpoints. To my mind, it is the best evidence that outside pressure is the most effective course of action vis-a-vis Israel and its occupation policies.

      Reply to Comment
      • My guess is that the (declining) possibility of a Syrian strike is a more likely explanation. Such events are presumed to enhance possible militant activity, so the security apparatus enhances surveillance as a deterrent signal. There is no causal connection between those searched and presumed activity. Someone said things are getting hotter, we should do something, and you live the result. Security organs work as much through internal protocols as external world stimulus. The Soviets engaged in extermination terror with little apparent real threat. Once you decide to prevent low probability events, much can be justified.

        Reply to Comment
    2. “When Israeli forces then tried to enter the university, which is located in Area B, staff stopped them. As the staff is unarmed, it is safe to assume that they used nonviolent means to prevent the armed Israelis from going on campus. Israeli forces then fired tear gas and rubber coated bullets at the school. Dozens of students suffered from gas inhalation…” : As described, this is just bizarre. Security forces are denied legal entry, so they launch a crowd control attack from afar. The mentality needed to so react is brute dull.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Rachelle Pachtman

      I am just at such a loss. I cannot get my arms around the escalation of this craziness. Has the world gone mad?

      Reply to Comment
      • XYZ

        Rachelle, I would rather say the world is returning to normal. For a few decades after the horrors of the Second World War, there was an expressed aversion to wars and to massive human rights abuses. That period is now ending. Robert Kennedy, who was considered at the end of his life to be a “progressive”, said the US had the “right to moral leadership of the world”. Obama and those who support him would laugh at such a statement today. Obama said that Americans are “tired of wars” so as far as they are concerned, the mass killings in Syria can go on and on, the vicious persecutions of Christian and other minorities in the Middle East are of no interest, and poison gas can be used at will against civilian populations. Americans and Europeans are interested only in their bread and circuses. This has traditionally been the way the world has been and it is reverting to this, ironically lead by the “progressives” who have “human rights” on their lips, but in reality have stone in their hearts.

        Reply to Comment
        • Danny

          “Rachelle, I would rather say the world is returning to normal.”

          Here we go… So ‘normal’ in your view is war, human-rights abuses and never-ending conflict. Wonderful view of the world you rightists have.

          Let’s hope your normal continues to be rejected by a majority of the world’s population (including, happily enough, by a majority of Americans, who have just told Obama to shove his Syrian attack where the sun don’t shine).

          Reply to Comment
          • XYZ

            How on earth did you twist what I wrote into implying that I liked that situation? Anybody else could see that I was critical of it. You target “right-wingers” and then cast aspersions on everything they write.

            Reply to Comment
        • Exactly how Robert Kennedy obviates firing tear gas into a university escapes me. But perhaps I have stones in my brain.

          Reply to Comment
    4. Philos

      Jewish holidays = West Bank lock down. This has been the practice since I was in the army and that was over ten years ago in 2001. It isn’t right. Maybe in 2002 and 2003. But since then it’s just arbitrary

      Reply to Comment
      • Ah. A better explanation.

        Reply to Comment
    5. rsgengland

      A military jeep drives into the area and the local youths and students start to “NON VIOLENTLY” throw stones.
      The soldiers then respond.
      If anyone had any brains, the locals and students would not “NON VIOLENTLY” throw stones, and the army would not respond.
      But that would not support anyones agenda; would it.
      There are supposed to be negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.
      All I hear though is the Palestinians leaking unsubstantiated claims to try and rubbish said negotiations.
      I seriously doubt the leadership of the Palestinian Authority would know how to handle peace, even if they actually negotiated in good faith in the first place.
      The PA is an unelected, corrupt, unrepresentative body that would never be able to deliver peace, even if they achieved a deal.
      The stupidity and pointlessness of “NON VIOLENT” stone throwing just perpetuates the cycle of violence and death.
      The Palestinians want Israel destroyed, and the behavior described in the article will continue indefinitely until that attitude changes.

      Reply to Comment
      • The Boarder Police were refused university entry, apparently in conformity with law. Yes, likely stones were thrown. Since the police were refused entry, if they left the stones would stop. Staying, firing tear gas into the university, the police harmed bystanders there for education and could not, in any case, achieve anything–for they had been refused entry. The correct response would have been to just leave. But that would have “shown weakness,” which is not allowed. So you tear gas students trying to get an education, thereby giving them an education, a lesson you provide, but with conclusions you may well not expect. And that, sir, is just plain stupid.

        Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel