Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Rabin's murder and the paper that was never published

A page has emerged from Haaretz’s daily op-ed pages, printed before the murder but never distributed; strangely enough, the coverage of GOP-Likud relations in a piece in the page remains as relevant as ever.

Yesterday was the 17th anniversary of the murder of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Rabin’s right-wing assassin, a law student from Bar-Ilan University named Yigal Amir, shot him at close range following a peace rally in Tel Aviv. It was Saturday night, at 9:42 p.m.

Papers print many of their pages in the afternoon and early evening, as did Haaretz that day. Naturally, when news of the assassination arrived, the daily ‘B’ supplement of political op-eds and TV and radio listings became irrelevant. It wasn’t distributed.

In the 90s, Haaretz sometimes wrapped its news deliveries with printed but unused pages. So it happened that in December 1995, Hanan Cohen received his newspaper wrapped with the pages of a paper from an alternate reality – one in which the prime minister was never killed. Cohen scanned and posted those pages on his Hebrew blog. With his permission, I am re-posting some of the items here.

Here is the masthead with the date – November 5, 1995.

Haaretz credit box, November 5th 1995

The daily cartoon referred to the changes that commercial television – which had been introduced only a couple of years earlier – brought to Israeli life. The woman is seen asking the man, “Did you set up the VCR (to record the rally)?” Israelis were just beginning to realize that if something wasn’t on TV, it probably never happened. The cartoon also shows how important the rally was – it was the event that everyone talked about that week, the much anticipated answer to the wild protests that the right has been holding against the government.

The most interesting piece in the B supplement is this op-ed by Akiva Eldar, then Haaretz correspondence to Washington. It touches on what had become a growing problem for the government around those days: the attempts of the Republicans – coordinated with Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu – to derail the fragile peace process. Eldar reports on how GOP leaders in Congress Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich tried to embarrass the Clinton administration with a decision to move the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Knowing that this move might damage the ability to reach a final-status agreement with the PLO, the Israeli government privately objected, but as Eldar reports, AIPAC and the Presidents Conference had the upper hand. A few days later, the lobby and Congress recognized another opportunity to poison Israeli-Palestinian relations. Eldar wrote:

Less than a week later [after the decision on the embassy] the law suspending the American ban on negotiations with the PLO and economic aid to the Palestinians was about to expire. Due to disagreements on matters that have nothing to do with the Palestinians, Dole refused for three days to prompt the head of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, Jesse Helms, to temporarily extend the validity of the law.

Congress wasn’t so impressed with claims made by the State Department according to which shutting down the PLO delegation to Washington would humiliate the Palestinians. The legislators are not listening to warnings from the Israeli Embassy – let alone the Palestinians – that they are sabotaging the atmosphere of reconciliation between the two peoples. The case of the Jerusalem embassy reminds us that they [the legislators] pay more attention to the voices coming out of the offices of the Presidents Conference and AIPAC.

This piece never made it to Haaretz’s readers. Six months after Rabin’s murder, Benjamin Netanyahu was elected prime minister, and the government in Jerusalem, AIPAC and Congress were in sync again.

And this Archive picture also trended on the social networks this week: Netanyahu at a protest calling for Rabin’s death, with Hangman’s knot and a coffin near him.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. XYZ

      Regarding the noose, it reminds me of how the “peaceful progressive” put up a guillotine at the “social protests”
      in summmer 2012.

      Reply to Comment
    2. The protest at Raanana Junction used the prop of a casket “Rabin is killing Zionism” – it was not calling for Rabin’s death and at the time that the prop was used no on thought twice about it. It was in fact useed many times. And this was no suprise since similar caskets were used by Israel Military Industries (IMI) workers protesting government policy at the time (“killing IMI”) as well as by Haifa University studients (“Government Killing Higher Education”). The noose props had a sign that Oslo was killing us.

      Again – one may not have been pleased with the protest props but they in no way had anything to do with calling for anything to be done to PM Rabin.

      And again – at the time of the protests at Raanana Junciton – a time I might add that the media was bending over backwards to support PM Rabin, promote Oslo and question the legitimacy of opposition to Oslo – absolutely no one in the media – be it local regional or national papers or TV – indicated that there was anything problematic with protest props of the “Casket of Zionism” (Rabin killing Zionism) or a noose (Oslo killing us).

      It was only after the murder of Rabin that someone dug it up fro the archives

      Reply to Comment
      • XYZ

        Dr Lerner,
        Thanks for the clarification, but you have to learn the rules with “progressive”. Right-wingers are assumed to be violent barbarians, thus they must be silenced because “words can kill”. However, “progressives” are wonderful, civilized people who only care about human rights, so they can use as much violent imagary as they want in the name of “freedom of speech”.

        Reply to Comment
    3. Two wrongs do not make the first wrong right, XYZ. The bag of redirection rhetoric of Mosaic right nationalists is rather limited, I continue to see.

      US political process outside of elite foregin policy does not care about the Palestinians at all. A world has been conjured which places not just blame but a kind of original sin on them. The conflict is used as a metaphor of the true fight which cultural conservatives play out in the US: purity, submission. I believe the Israeli left and Palestinians must face suicide bombing; it did happen, and might happen again. But the bombings have placed blood attaint on all Palestinians as a racial characteristic. Blood attaint is forbidden in law in the US constitution, and its denial is where forgiveness begins. Forgiveness is not an acceptance of blame to be absolved, but a reset–for all. Until you can risk a world without bombings, how can your proceed to change? I doubt such a world exists; but a world with rare bombings is possible, and ideals are our way to getting there, past our own barriers, barriers not without rationale.

      Rabin was assasinated partly because he refused the bomber’s gambit. A military man decided to refuse.

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel