# Adalah’s donors in 2009 include the European Union, Switzerland, Ford Foundation, Open Society Institute, Oxfam-Novib, Christian Aid, NDC.

# Drafted a 2007 “Democratic Constitution,” which calls for replacing the Jewish foundation of the state with a “democratic, bilingual and multicultural” framework. Jewish immigration would be permitted for “humanitarian reasons.”

Comparing Adalah’s record with Hoover criteria is unfair, because Hoover did not give a hoot if NAACP was anti-Semitic or not (and it was not!) while NGO Monitor does not give a hoot about Communist infiltration. Adalah’s was cited 39 times by evil Goldstone report. Second, Adalah worked jointly with Al-Haq which is doubly evil as Palestinian and radical. Al-Haq is also almost terrorist.

How radical is Al-Haq? They got some money from German Rosa Luxemburg Institute which is run by Communists. Aha! But NGO Monitor does not care, because they got more money from anti-Semitic sources like Ford Foundation (Communist stooges AND corporate shills!) But terrorists connections are more juicy:

the head of al-Haq was denied exit visa by Israel, and lost the appeal

former al-Haq employee was subpoenaed by FBI, she also have been driving (well, taking mass transit) under influence (of radical ideology).

Someone could make a facile statement that if Maureen Claire Murphy was investigated by FBI and nothing happened that PROVES that she is not a terrorist. But that overlooks the possibility that radical leftists at the top echelons of US Administration squashed the investigation due to their Islamo-fascists sympathies.

You are 100% correct. The NAACP was regarded by J.E. Hoover and other US government luminaries as a Coommunist infiltrated, Soviet controlled front group trying to foment race riots and destruction of Anglo Saxon Christian culture, a major threat to USA stability and security. Adalah doesn’t even come close.

http://972mag.com/scrutinizing-the-guardians-of-zion-part-ii-louis-frankenthaler/2247/

“These Guardians Of Zion, (GOZs to be terse) have found it necessary to degrade democratic discourse, to debase civil society and to defile the public sphere with a distinctly uncivil, monist and monologically hegemonic non-dialogue, which not only delineates the boundaries of accepted speech, action and thought but also attempts to set out rewards and punishments for those who abide by these limits and those who dare to violate them. In the past one may have thought of these GOZs as just another part of the civic conversation. But, they have so clearly embedded themselves in the Israeli political process so as to have co-opted discourse with a clear vision of what is forbidden and permitted in the Israeli body politic.”

And come on, Adalah is the NAACP? You’re insulting the NAACP.

By the way, there is a key difference between you and other NGOs criticized by NGO Monitor and NGO Monitor: they report on you guys and attempt to modify the anti-Israel propaganda mill, while the NGOs under discussion are actively attempting to influence and change Israeli society and are obviously influenced or trying to please by their outside funding sources.

Imagine how many articles you’d write about Israel’s perfidy if Israel was to sponsor, say, British NGOs intended to bring down the British government or make it give Scotland the freedom it so desires?