Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

J14: No need to bring up the occupation - it’s the capitalism, stupid!

With the growing number of calls for J14 to address the “elephant in the room” that apparently no one is willing to talk about – the occupation (shhh!), it’s important to understand something: there is no elephant

Demonstration in Beer Sheva, Aug. 13 (photo: Activestills.org)

Lately there have been calls on the Left, including here on +972, for the #J14 movement to talk about the elephant in the tent: the occupation.

Not only do these calls show a misunderstanding of Israeli society, they also show what I believe to be a misunderstanding of what #J14 is really about.

Allow me to begin with the latter. What is J14 about? Well, the symbolic slogan of this movement is “the people demand social justice.” This slogan also serves as the trigger for those calls from the Left: “Well, how can you talk about social justice when there is no justice for Palestinians?”

Unfortunately, you can.

1. Social justice? Not exactly

Although the protesters are demanding “social justice,” what they’re really asking for is “more money!” – as painful as that may sound. What they’re really shouting is, “Hey! How about a little less capitalism, and a tad more socialism!” Let’s not forget what triggered these demos: Daphne Leef couldn’t afford her rent and set up a Facebook page. It doesn’t get more financial than that.

This revolution is all about money. Sure, there are also elements of “justice” in it (better education for all, health services for all, better taxation, the end of rampant privatization and more) – but the engine of this movement is the realization of people that the system is screwing them. The system gives too much to the rich, and less to them. They are what Guy Rolnik of Haaretz calls “the unconnected”:

“We called them unconnected because they had nearly no chance of ever connecting to the nodes of power and the center of the discourse. The tent protest is the first time this many of the unconnected have woken up, united and decided to speak out. They suddenly realized that their life – their economic and social future – has been obscured by the security smokescreen and the dispute between right and left, religious and secular. They realized the “start-up nation” story of high-tech creating social mobility and growth is important – but relevant to only a small group.”

I couldn’t be more proud to say that Israelis are now at the forefront of one of the most important battles being waged around the globe. It’s the battle of those “unconnected” against “capitalism gone wild”. Let’s be clear – the occupation is a crime, but “capitalism gone wild”, led by Wall St., by the humongous, uber-powerful international corporations and by Western states is just as big a crime that has caused death and extreme poverty across so many nations and continents, it dwarfs the death and destruction wrought by the Is\Pal conflict.

Show me another nation that has put 5% of its population on the streets for this battle. Go on, show me.

Israelis are fighting a dictator no less ruthless, no less sly than Hosni Mubarak or Bashar Assad or Muammar Gaddafi. The dictator they fight is the silent system of ruthless capitalism, a system that is all numbers and figures and toxic assets hovering somewhere in an unreachable sphere right above their heads. They don’t understand it, because it’s just too complicated. Only a select few do. We can’t. We’re unconnected.

2. To Brussels!

But we’re not only “the unconnected”, as Rolnik calls us. We’re also the “indignados” of Spain marching towards Brussels as we speak. We’re also the Greeks rioting against their government’s failures. We are also the “hooligans” of London – yes, there’s a reason why they’re out there (I’m not justifying rioting, but come on – read into it a bit. They’ve been unconnected for decades). And we are the Americans, whose disgust from Wall St. put Barack Obama in the White House, and we are the amazing Americans who finally got off their back sides in Madison, Wisconsin and took over their state capital half a year ago.

This thing is global, and this thing is spreading.

This thing is about money, about wealth distribution, about “capitalism gone wild”.

It’s the capitalism that all of us began to finally understand after the crash in 2008. It’s the “economic awareness” that the world has been developing, and which is developing very, very fast in Israel. Israel used to have one financial daily, Globes, and now there are three, with The Marker and Calcalist. Not to mention the countless economic shows and consumer shows on prime time TV. Israelis today see with much more ease where all this wealth goes to. We look at the skies to see that promised “trickle down economy” – but the rain drops seems to stay up there in the clouds.

As renowned economist Professor Nouriel Rubini, also know as “Dr. Doom”, told the Wall Street Journal [Heb] yesterday, there is a line connecting all this:

“We are witnessing mass demonstrations in developed economies such as Israel, where a rise in housing prices and inflation have caused discontent for the middle class. The same is happening in Britain. People who are poor and desperate, whether they are in Britain or Egypt, tend to take part in riots.”

3. Reprimand me? For what?!

Yet there are those who have the audacity to reprimand us for wanting a piece of the pie. To those people, who have a problem with some of the protesters who continue to drink in cafes and eat sushi, who chastise us for selfishly wanting to improve our materialistic conditions, I say: Please, don’t be so patronizing. What exactly did you expect, after brainwashing us for decades with your sitcoms, your soap operas, your cooking shows, your commercials, after you taught us that if we worked hard enough we’d be rich one day and live in a McMansion in suburbia? That we won’t want to eat sushi? That we shouldn’t long for a McMansion? Wait, we have to become long haired hippies now? You were just teasing us? Showing us the candy and then chucking it away?

I’m not ashamed to say it: I want more money! I want more money, darn it! The Issac Tshuvas have enough, the Rupert Murdochs have enough and so do all the others! I want more money! I don’t want to be filthy rich, I just want to say “yes” to my kid when she asks me if she can take piano lessons! I want to tell the dentist “OK, give her braces”. Why should I even have to think twice about that, for crying out loud?

Not only is this thing about money – it’s about finally understanding that we’ve been taken for a ride. Which also makes this about dignity. The dignity of all of us, who have been fooled for way too long.

4. Not out of love for Mordechai

So, now that we’ve settled the first misunderstanding, let’s get to the core of this rant – the misunderstanding of Israeli society, and why the occupation does not have to be addressed by J14.

Don’t get me wrong – the occupation could end as a result of this revolution, but as a by-product. Inshallah! It could actually end because Israelis will say “more to education, less to settlements, more to health, less to Haredim.” But that wouldn’t be because they care about Palestinians. Or their rights. Or their justice. In a way, the occupation could end, as we say in Israel, “not out of love for Mordechai but out of hatred for Haman”. Haman being “capitalism gone wild”.

Honestly, wake up. It won’t end because Israelis suddenly care about Palestinian rights and think we should talk about it on Rothschild boulevard! Ha! Don’t make me laugh. As if Israelis could care any less about Palestinians than they have over the last 45 years of occupation. You honestly think that Israelis, just because they’re chanting “social justice,” will suddenly give a damn? “Naive” is an understatement.

5. J14 as a mirror of Israeli society

The chances of Israelis beginning to give a hoot about Palestinians diminishes as the weeks go by. As these protests become more widespread, as more of Israeli society takes part in them, they become more and more a mirror of what Israeli society is today – which is a society that has chosen Benjamin Netanyahu as their prime minister, a society that is content with the most right wing, racist Knesset in Israeli history. So really, what are the odds of the occupation turning into a topic at the tents in Afula, Bet Shemesh, Kiryat Shmona and Netanya? Zilch, my friends. Zero.

One has to understand – there is no elephant in the room. Actually, there is an elephant – but he’s invisible, across the fence, across the Green Line. Israelis like it that way. It’s not that people are scared to whisper the word “occupation”. They’re fully aware of it’s existence, and they’re OK with it. (In fact, if there is an elephant in the room it’s probably Karl Marx, who people are afraid to say was right about many things. But you didn’t hear that from me…)

As political psychologist Daniel Bar Tal told Haaretz last week, the occupation gets Israelis angry:

“For years, security and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have pushed economic and social hardship into a secondary place. Although there’s a very close connection between these two issues, they don’t connect in the minds of most of Jewish society. Not only do people not feel any dissonance about it, they are even angry when their personal hardships are linked to issues of peace and security.”

So, to simplify the way an Israeli brain works: J14 = economy; Occupation = security. For Israelis the difference could not be greater. It’s apples and oranges. You don’t mix the two. You can’t. And why should they? That would be like asking demonstrators against Roe v. Wade on Capitol Hill to address the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Even the Arab speakers at the various demonstrations, from what I’ve heard (I may have missed some), have not directly addressed the occupation either – or even utter the word. Rather, they point out how they, too, are victims of capitalism and that they have it even tougher because of Israeli policies, of how the wealth is distributed. But the focus is still on money, on how the system screws everybody – equally.

6. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t

I am in awe of these protests, confronting what is in my eyes the most important battle being waged today around the world. Sure, it’s fine to critique this revolution. But give it a chance, for Christ’s sake. Taking on a huge demon like “capitalism gone wild” will take more than a few weeks. Why is it that I keep getting that feeling, that a lot of people will never give Israelis the credit they should get where deserved? It’s taking the “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” to extremes.

Besides the global battle, Israelis – Jews and Arabs together – are now in the midst of one of the most difficult battles ever waged here in Israel: pushing those economic and social hardships into first place in the Israeli political discourse. Putting security second. I can’t wait for the days when Israel will be a “normal” country where right and left are divided over socio-economic issues, and not ridiculous claims of who owns a centimeter of land. I can’t wait for the days when people care more about money than about holy sites.

So, I’m sorry if we’re not talking about the occupation. The occupation is an ugly crime, and it is turning Israel into an apartheid state.

And it’s a shame most Israelis aren’t fighting both battles at once. It’s a shame most of us have chosen only one battle.

But I’m hopeful that the battle chosen now by Israelis could eventually even win the “battle not taken”, by suffocating the occupation it of its funds.

And above all, I’m very proud that we Israelis have the guts to stand up and take part in one of the biggest battles around.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Renee

      But Rick, what you fail to take into account is that the “occupation” is about money, too. If you want to see what is driving something to happen, “follow the money”. So who profits from the Occupation? Developers, construction companies, military suppliers, etc. who then whip up the nationalist and/or religious meshuganehs to fall into line. Plus by not having affordable housing within the green line they create an economic incentive for Israelis with no particular political or religious leaning, who just want a house over their head, to move across the Green Line (and then add their voices to continuing the occupation to protect their own self interests). So the issues are are very interwoven…..

      Reply to Comment
    2. The economic threads connecting London, Tel Aviv, Madrid, Athens, Wisconsin…are undeniable. And while I agree with your assessment that the J14 protests are centrally rooted in economic issues, I would also argue that there would be nothing inconsistent with expanding them at some stage to geopolitical issues (such as the settlements and the occupation), for those issues also have, aside from the ideological foundations, connective economic threads.

      Reply to Comment
    3. Mikh

      eep! the Labor party just got ressurected on 972!

      Reply to Comment
    4. It seems to me that a justice movement will not be able to grow if ignores any symptoms. And isn’t the occupation and the militarism it embeds into your society is an elephant sitting right on your throat?

      Reply to Comment
    5. Ben Israel

      David Harris-Gershon ==
      Didn’t the Republicans win most of the recall elections in Wisconsin, in spite of the fact that the Democrats and Trade Unions poured in huge amounts of money into the Democratic campaign against the Republicans?

      Reply to Comment
    6. Couple of comments. If it is true that about 5% of Israeli society pooled out into the streets and it’s as hard as you describe it to hear chants for (Israeli) Arabs rights in housing and land, then it’s not only the Knesset that has a serious racist problem. Sorry to say that. I am not talking about the occupation or the Arabs beyond 67, the ones who will hardly see a viable state of their own (takes to where they should end up?), I am talking about non-Jewish citizens of Israel. They too are having problems, money problems. You can’t have an apartheid system and ask for social justice.

      Reply to Comment
    7. A society and a state built on ethnic cleansing, looting, and land grab, will never see social justice until it is taken apart and dismantled.

      Christians, Muslims, Jews, and all others..hand in hand.. will free Palestine from the river to the sea.

      Reply to Comment
    8. @Ami Kaufman: Calm down. You are correct, I think, that personal survival and economic security will drive protests. You are right, too, I think, that economics will force a hard look at the occupation. But Ben Israel is right that in the US a right “leave me alone” populism is ascendant. You are wrong, I suspect, in saying that Israelis are fine with the present Knesset; rather, Israelis have been told that nothing else is possible. They seem to be redefining “possible” at the moment.

      Let these people tell you what they are. Do not tell them; I suspect they are rather tired of that. Those of +972 have worked hard and risked hard to be in a place to report and analyze these protests. But if you tell them what they are, you will be making the same mistake as standard Right and Left.

      I still say,and will continue to say, call for a Constitutional Convention. Your analysis is compatible with such a call. And this call does not tell them what they must be.

      Reply to Comment
    9. JewsRSonsofDogs

      This comment has been deleted and the user banned from the site

      Reply to Comment
    10. Ruth Winestock

      The Demonstrations for Social Justice and a Welfare State are SOOOO important!!

      I hope the people involved will see the opportunity at hand.

      With a Parliamentary system, Israel now has the opportunity to create a strong new political party that my sweep the coming elections. If the demonstrations continue and people can see beyond their divisions and stay united, a new vision can be created and put into action.

      At least i hope deeply that these protest will bring down Natanyahu, his government with it’s gangster economics and fascist policies, and create space for something better.

      Reply to Comment
    11. Ariely

      am an Israeli.
      Me and my friends are not poor people, have high educations, god jobs, enjoy our life, love our democracy and freedom.
      However we are taking part in the social protest because we think that major corrections should be done in our society.

      Not to revolution- Yes to evolution!
      Not to pure capitalism, communism, socialism!
      Yes to a learning form mistakes and make correction- adaptive system for the benefit of the citizens.
      _
      I am for:
      1: Power to the people:
      The governmental system should be changed:
      Presidential government-direct elected.
      Parliament members-direct elected.
      Parliament t members will not take part in the government
      2: Econamical incentives to citizens contributing to society.
      *Differentiate social priorities and benefits:
      The ones fulfilling their citizen’s ship duties should be get priority on affordable housing, cheep education from children garden up university, lower income duties, lower and differentiated indirect taxes example the VAT
      3: The government should encourage:
      *Increase national income by pursing unproductive sectors to join the working citizens
      * Provide government incentives to start ups committing build in Israel in addition of development centers local manufacturing as well.
      * Industry and start ups to move from Tel Aviv area to peripheries.

      I oppose:
      * New elections ahead of the 4 years elected period
      *Demands to changing the current government
      *Connecting the protest to foreign policy
      *Politicians attempt to split the people between left, right, secular, religions, Ashkenazi, Sfaradi .
      *Increase budget deficit

      Reply to Comment
    12. clafoutis

      the only real thing that the demonstrators is about is learning to behave as a people.

      we tend to think that zionism has overcome shtetl mentality by the simple fact of establishing an independant state able to defend itself.

      it has not

      shtetl mentality (from any origin) is the main problem of israeli society. it induces inter alia the feeling that you can’t control your own destiny.

      the other is always to blame – be it the PA or the arab league or president Obama.

      what this protest is all about is learning to regain control and letting some of the warmth of the too known way of thinking fade away.

      it won’t be the last step (if there is ever such a step) but only one one the way.

      getting out of the shtetl is a long path much longer than what Herzl could have ever imagined

      Reply to Comment
    13. Koshiro

      “I am for:
      1: Power to the people:”
      Which people?

      Reply to Comment
    14. Christine Boisvert

      Here is what Al Jazeera allows an Isreli
      (or an Israeli-activist to say, on page 2 of a column of the article:
      ”Its time for all Palestinians to be heard”

      MA- posts:

      Its time to take care of the Palesnian
      ”problem”. Outrigth Genocide is the only way to cure the middle east of one of its worst problems every arab or muslim country would be freed of the pest that is the Palestinians, they are squators, are illetered and posses violent nature(…)Jews towns will be infested with Palestinian vermin. End it once and for all the rest of the muslim arab asia negroid countries would be better off sorting their own problems witouth refugee arab crab louse that is the Palestinian.
      P.S. flagg is useles.
      Thank you Al Jazeera and thank you all, for the bla bla. We are reliving European Jewish Third Reich nostalgia. That is the question.

      Reply to Comment
    15. Andy

      Most Israelis are not oblivious to the Occupation, but just don’t see a way of ending it whilst maintaining security. So yes its seen as separate but one that has to be legitimately sidelined for now if we want to move forward with other non security issues.

      But its not making Israel apartheid. On the contrary, as more Israeli Arabs come in to the mainstream, joining Israeli Jews and demonstrating freely, it is another sign of the increasing emancipation of minorities in Israel, and long may it continue.

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel