Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Human rights march in Tel Aviv to counter anti-NGO legislation

The true essence of the foreign funding bill is its subjugation of all Israeli civil society organizations to the government’s whims. On Friday, December 9, 2011, Israeli civil society fights back at the human rights march

By Ehud Uziel

The revised Akunis-Kirschenbaum foreign funding bill backed by Prime Minister Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Lieberman is genius. Their proposed amendment to the income tax law will obligate a 45% taxation rate on donations from “a foreign state entity” to Israeli nonprofit organizations. The amendment will leave room for only one type of exemption for NGOs: those that also receive funding from the government. Those who do not already receive government funding must refer to a special Knesset “exemptions” committee that will decide whether to grant the tax exemption or not.  This bill is genius because it doesn’t contribute a single thing to the Israeli public but makes all the headlines.

It’s genius because it redefines what is central and what is marginal in Israeli society, without drawing too much opposition, since it doesn’t impact the majority. It’s genius because it destroys civil society in Israel, but directs the public debate to focus exclusively on “NGOs that are anti-Israel.”

The essence of the bill is not a war on human rights organizations, or on criticism of government policy and the occupation, or even on foreign government donations. The true essence of the law is making all civil society organizations in Israel that seek foreign donations subordinate to the state and its government – since those organizations that aren’t also funded by the state will have no choice but to refer to the special Knesset “exemptions” committee and request the state’s benevolence. If this law is passed it will become much more difficult for an NGO to remain independent and not depend on the state’s generosity, whether it focuses on women’s rights, disability rights or the rights of Palestinians under military law.

The subjugation of civil society organizations to the state takes place in many countries, and NGOs fear the state in many countries. These are not democratic countries and their regimes are much more concerned with themselves than with their citizens. Proposed laws such as the Akunis-Kirschenbaum bill seek to divert the debate from legitimate criticism of policy to a struggle over the very ability to voice criticism; from a fundamental discussion about social justice and freedom and questioning military control of another people – to an inane conversation about the legitimacy of donations being made to human rights organization by the European Union, and whether these 2 million Euros are different from the 150 million Euro donated by the EU to scientific research in Israel.

The best response we can provide is the human rights march next Friday, December 9, 2011. All those who continue to demand social justice will be there. All those who demand freedom and human rights will be there and all those who continue to demand the sustenance and expansion of Israeli democracy will be there. Everyone who understands that freedom of expression, thought and ideas – even those ideas which are most critical and unaccepted by society – are what constitute the most profound foundation of democracy.

In a letter sent by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) to the Foreign Minister last week, we cautioned against his misleading the public by comparing this bill to legislation in the US and Canada. The differences are huge. For example, the US only requires transparency and reports on donations from foreign entities, which already exists in Israel, and there is no clause in the US regarding taxation rates.

ACRI also helped draft and encouraged Members of Knesset from all factions to push a new bill, “Basic Law: Social Rights” onto the legislative table in the Knesset. This meticulously drafted bill obligates the state to provide basic services to all its residents.  We cannot only react but rather we must continue to combine opposition with initiatives. It is not sufficient to protest “Enough!” (of the witch hunt) but we must also demand “More!” (social justice).

The Human Rights March will transform the defense of democracy into the demand for social and civil justice. The march is the place to be for all those who care about what is really important: cultivating a healthy civil society with social legislation, the guarantee of freedom and the maintenance of Israeli democracy.

Ehud Uziel is Campaign Director of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Louis

      I do not think that the march is the “best response” the human rights committee has to offer in response to the authoritarian trends in Israel – legislation, opinion, discourse. While marching is a good way to show those who attack human rights, democracy and dissent that, vial our numbers, that we will not shut up or shut down, so too must we continue unchecked in our activities and advocacy. We refuse to give in or to compromise our values and actions. We do not accept any sort of watered down versions of the bills on the table and remember that the essence of the bills is to formulate the destruction of dissenting and democratic civil society. We stop being so gentle in reminding the the J14 protestors and organizers (a movement that most of us in the HR community participated in and encouraged) that the demand for social justice is political no less than the demands for other human rights for others. We remind the J14 organizers and the rest of civil society that they are next on the Israeli authoritarian hit list. While the Government hates and fears HR Organizations because we tell the unpopular and non approved truth about what Israel is doing to Palestinians for example, the State will soon come after those who expose Israel’s sinister side regarding the ongoing religious coercion, the racism, the fact that Israeli economic policy creates an ever growing class of working poor… people working more and getting poorer… all these are no less political and part of critical dissent that is the core of social change…

      So first they came for the hardcore leftists and then they came for the more Zionist-liberal leftists, etc. and when they come for the soup kitchen operators because the dare draw attention to hunger there will be not an NGO left to go to the High Court… and who will be smiling, dressed in silk pajamas, smoking big cigars and drinking brandy… we know…

      Reply to Comment
    2. Does this bill place a 45% tax on receipts by Palestinian NGOs of foreign government donations, or only Israeli NGOs? Do the foreign governments involved, EU I should think, make other donations into Israel which they could withhold in protest?

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel