8 comments for ”Deconstructing Netanyahu’s speech: No reason for applause“

    
  1. This was almost a computer generated speech. Almost every sentence comes straight from the hasbara manual. Like the manual orders he used about 50 times the word peace attacked Hamas, Iran and the Militant Islam and spared the PA but stressed there is no partner for peace…
    .
    His far reaching offer:
    .
    Jordan valley => Long term Israeli
    .
    Jerusalem => Israeli
    .
    Neighborhoods and suburbs of Jerusalem and Greater Tel Aviv => Israeli
    .
    Refugees => Palestinian state
    .
    Places of critical strategic and national importance =>Israeli
    .
    Solid security arrangements on the ground
    .
    fully demilitarized
    .
    Netanyahu is offering nothing more than three enclaves (Jericho, North enclave, South enclave) at the mercy of Israel. Gaza is seen as another country.

  2. 
  3. @Directrob

    And what’s wrong with that? You think Israel is going to hand over Jerusalem – a city it has ruled for 45 years to an infant government that can’t manage its own cheque book?

    Arabs in Jerusalem don’t want to live in a Palestinian state, so why should the capital be divided?

    As far as refugees go, it is a deal-killer to claim decedents of so-called refugees have right to access a country they were never born in.

    Solid security agreements on the ground make perfect sense. Do you remember the hundreds of suicide bombings? Daily terrorist acts?

    All the wars Israel has fought occurred under labor governments engaged in the process. Since Netanyahu took over, there is peace. Palestinian economy is up. Violence is down. Whatever agreement the Palestinians sign they won’t be able to honor it.

    It seems the Left is incapable of evaluating the Palestinians. They whine about Israel but say nothing of the Palestinian position. Because the Palestinian position is unreasonable. So why try and defend it? Notice the Palestinians didn’t defend any of their demands, they simply rejected Netanyahu. Surprise. Rejection. That’s all Islamic states do.

  4. 
  5. Division of Jerusalem means DESTRUCTION of Jerusalem. No one knows this better than the Arabs of the city which is why they prefer to live under Israeli rule even if they don’t like it.
    Netanyahu was alluding to the fact that if the city should be divided, the first to suffer will be the Christian churches in the city. They would be subject to the same harrassment Christians face all over the Middle East (e.g. Copts in Egypt, terrorized flight of Christians from Iraq, etc)

  6. 
  7. Ha’aretz poll shows Israeli public warmly received Netanyahu’s speech in Congress and his popularity rating has increased:

    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/haaretz-poll-netanyahu-s-popularity-soaring-following-washington-trip-1.364068

  8. 
  9. “As far as refugees go, it is a deal-killer to claim decedents of so-called refugees have right to access a country they were never born in.”
    So, Abban Aziz, you’re claiming that people born elsewhere with only a tangential connection to the land have no true claim to the land? I think you just nullified Zionism.

  10. 
  11. The real problem will not go away. Sooner or later the world will have to confront “Zionism”.
    This is a most obvious thing, even to crazy zionists themselves.

  12. 
  13. .So, Abban Aziz, you’re claiming that people born elsewhere with only a tangential connection to the land have no true claim to the land? I think you just nullified Zionism.”

    No, I’m saying non-citizens who have lived in sovereign nations (Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon) for 60 years don’t have a right to access a nation they were never born in. This doesn’t “nullify” Zionism.

    The “right of return” is neither supported by international law (the left loves to cite the law when it helps them, ignores it when it doesn’t) or any historical precedent.

    Zionism = Jewish rights. Ireland, Scotland, Russia, and Spain all have their own emigration policies that allow non-citizens who can prove ancestry access to citizenship.

    In fact, about 20% of Israel’s population qualifies for citizenship in the European Union.

  14. 
  15. I have a sneaking suspicion that in his heart, Obama fully supports Abbas’ and Fayad’s U.N. strategy come September, but cannot openly support. As an Israeli Jew, I whole-heartedly support Abbas and Fayad’s noble efforts to bring about a Palestinian state – to be kicked off this coming September – with the brutal and criminal Israeli occupation regime doing everything in its considerable power to nip this effort in the bud. But I think this time they are going to fail, and miserably. And contrary to what Obama said (but doesn’t believe in), this effort will bear great fruit for the Palestinians as it will give them considerable power in the U.N. to make life very hard for Israel, and possibly bring about sanctions upon it. Obama will officially get on the bandwagon after 2012.



Leave a comment