5 comments for ”Great-grandson of S.Y Agnon to McEwan: Don’t shake hands with apartheid“

    
  1. Though regrettable, Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem does not constitute apartheid. Forcing Arabs to share a city with Jews is the opposite of apartheid. Dishonest and cynical use of international law discredits the left, it doesn’t empower it.

  2. 
  3. Richard, in JLM separate legal statuses constitute apartheid. And in the west bank , separate legal systems certainly constitute apartheid.

    ofer
    p.s
    not regrettable, criminal.

  4. 
  5. Ofer is spot on. Pre-1967, the zionist state is apartheid because it is a Jewish state. Post 1967, theft is added on. The Goldstone Report is a belated effort of the UN to rectify the mistake it made in 1948. MrMCEWN by visiting any Jewish state is supporting apartheid

  6. 
  7. Raed, your view makes it very easy for most moral Israelis to stop trying all together. Defining ANY Jewish state as an apartheid state is bogus, and immoral, especially since there are so many Muslim states which I’m sure you’re totally fine with their definition. When there’s a synagogue (or a church) in Saudi Arabia, wake me up.
    I agree with Richard – what is happening in East Jerusalem is the opposite problem – annexation, not apartheid. And Ofer, discrimination is not apartheid.
    I do agree however that the situation in the fully Israeli controlled areas (C) of the west bank constitutes apartheid, but on such a small scale that that’s not the main issue. The main issue is to let a viable Palestinian state arise, and the dismantling of all settlements and road blocks.

  8. 
  9. Eyal, gullible you. As you know very well, Israel also controls the Palestinians of areas A and B (please spare me the quibbles about them paying municipal tax to the PA).
    And the Palestinians of east Jerusalem CANNOT buy property in large parts of west Jerusalem. They do not have Israeli citizenship. Apartheid.



Leave a comment