The Israeli Airports Authority has withdrawn a directive ordering cab companies servicing Ben Gurion Airport employees to refrain from hiring Arab taxi drivers.
Dimi Reider reported on Sunday that the airport’s transportation manager sent a letter prohibiting a cab company contracted by the Airport Authority from employing of “minorities” – a term used in Hebrew to refer to Arab citizens.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel last week sent a complaint (Hebrew) to the Airport Authority, calling the directive a violation of constitutional principles of equality and freedom of occupation, particularly grave coming from a public institution.
The Airports Authority this week canceled the directive and tried to distance itself from its wording, seeming to chalk it up to a contractual misunderstanding and personnel mishap. The relevant portions of the Airport Authority’s response text are translated below (the Hebrew appears in full further down).
May 21, 2012
Adv. Tal Hassin
The Association for Civil Rights IsraelRe: Moni Siton Transportation LTD
In response to your letter from 17.05.2011, addressed to the director general of the Aiport Authority (hereinafter: AA), I respond as follows:
- The letter distributed by Mr. Shuki Shemer to the taxi company Moni Siton LTD was issued without the employer being authorized to issue this letter, and thus the Security Department Manager has issued a letter annulling the letter attached (the letter with the correction is attached).
- Without derogating from the foregoing, I would like to note that in Moni Siton LTD’s contract with the AA, it commits it will not hire divers who it does not directly employ without the prior approval of the AA. Since complaints have been made with regards to the employment of drivers who are not directly employed with the company, the letter was issued. Unfortunately, the letter does not reflect the position of the AA and its policy.
- The Airports Authority has no policy forbidding the employment of minorities (as opposed to the subject of your letter, Arabs were not mentioned). On the other hand, when it comes to the transport of employees and any other contractual engagement, the AA forbids the service provider from delegating or transferring its services to a secondary provider, without the prior approval of the Authority – such is how it has always been and such is the Authority policy with service provider, without discriminating between secondary providers, and certainly not on the basis of religion, rage or gender.
Sincerely,
Aryeh Shaham, Adv.
Legal Advisor
[scribd id="94515170" key="key-2nirfdwfpf3lcbm2yoev" height="650" width="615"]
For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.
Maor
Yet again you here on 972 took a case of an individual racist act and made it a state official policy. Then you present the condemnation of the individual act as a “withdrawal” of the state authority from its alleged racist policy (on which it did not know about, apparently).
972 is a unique project: it is dedicated to “criticism of Israel”, i.e. to presenting Israel and Israeli society in a negative light. It collects issues and events that are of negative nature to affirm and confirm Israel’s evil/immoral/racist character, even when the events are the exception, even when they are condemned by society members and by the authorities. The goal is simple: “We told you so”. This is a common tactic among haters and bigots of all kinds: to manipulatively use what is often unrelated occurrences, exaggerate them, take them out of context and proportion, in order to support and justify an inclusive perspective on a group of people. The racists did it in Tel-Aviv yesterday: they used cases of crimes by immigrants to justify hate toward Africans. And you do it here everyday: you use cases of crimes or wrongdoing by Israelis to justify hate toward Israel.
Joe
Well, the fact is that there were racist policies carried out by the Israeli Airport Authorities. Not only this, but they were also illegal under Israeli laws. I don’t see how reporting these events here can be considered an action fruit of hate towards anyone.
Maor
Joe, this is a website that reports only negative events from Israel and from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in which Israel or Israeli authorities or Israeli settlers or Israeli individuals are allegedly the wrongdoers. It does not report any event in which the wrongdoers are not Israelis, whether in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or within Israeli society. It does not report any positive event in which Israelis or the Israeli authority are “good-doers”.
And I’m asking, for what purpose? for what purpose would you concentrate articles that show Israel or Israelis in a negative light in all kinds of situations that are not necessarily related? And for what reason would you also prefer to do that in an international language?