Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

Abbas performs the peace dance

Jewish leaders remain unmoved by this year’s performance.

From the events of the previous week: Prominent Israeli coalition members – including heads of different Knesset committees – published an ad in Haaretz, calling on Netanyahu to oppose any sort of territorial compromise. Netanyahu’s collation chairman, Likud’s Yariv Levin, told Al-Monitor that his boss will cease to be a prime minister should he sign an agreement with the Palestinians. Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon called for canceling the Oslo Accords (a good idea, although Danon supports doing so for the wrong reasons), and to make the current status quo – Palestinian autonomy under a permanent occupation – a lasting arrangement for the foreseeable future. Danon is no backbencher clown. His office is in charge of the West Bank and Gaza. Netanyahu, of course, doesn’t have any problem with any of these statements; they only boost his image as a leader who confronts his own camp merely by talking to Palestinians, but without actually paying any political price.

Meanwhile, the U.S. State Department is doing all it can to shield Israel from consequences of its policies, with Secretary of State John Kerry lobbying against the new European Union guidelines to limit joint projects with Israelis to the internationally-recognized 1967 border. Meanwhile, special envoy Martin Indyk is forbidden by Israel from entering the negotiation room, so that he isn’t able to see what doesn’t actually happen there. How comfortable for Indyk, who represents an administration that has decided to avoid any form of confrontation with the Israeli government, no matter what steps the latter makes on the ground.

As if to highlight the entire farce, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas recently had to go through the yearly peace dance in front of “leaders of the Jewish community” and “peace organizations.” In this ritualistic ceremony, Palestinians are required to answer all sort of questions on Zionism and Israel in order to win another year’s worth of support by the Jewish leadership for the ideas such as the “peace process” (C) and the “two-state solution” (TM).

Alas, the meeting didn’t go so well this time. According to a report by J.J. Goldberg – who participated in both this and last year’s event – Abbas rejected a demand by no less than six attendants to use his upcoming UN speech in order to address Israelis and allay their fears. Instead, Abbas intends to tell the world about the plight of his own people (bo-ring!) and to demand some sort of effort on the world’s behalf. This selfish move greatly disappointed the attendants, with one former Clinton administration aid remarking “I wish somebody could have asked him why nobody believes him.” Touché!

I don’t envy Abbas. The stamp of approval from the peace industry is necessary for keeping his financial and diplomatic lifeline unharmed (see what happened to Arafat when he lost it). But I wonder what made all those Jewish writers and leaders take part in such an embarrassing event, let alone try to get some more concessions out of Abbas (as if the peace talks and American pressure are not enough). Did any of them ever participate in such a grilling of an Israeli prime minister? What made them demand that the 78-year-old refugee from Safed help them in their political cause? Shouldn’t this be the other way around? Did they consider the possibility that the Israeli public has heard and understood Abbas all too well, but has decided to continue with the status quo?

At such moments, I really don’t know what separates the peace camp from the likes of Danon and Levin. In both cases, the Palestinians become the objects of their own political desires, but not much more.

Related
Why the EU shouldn’t amend its new settlement guidelines
Two state vs. one state debate is a waste of time, political energy
In the West Bank, a new settlement is born

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. I suspect Abbas fears a flare up in violence and doesn’t want to alienate people further through verbal capitulation. There is a strong tendency to condense Palestinians into The Palestinian who must behave correctly. Since causal paths cannot be drawn if only one The Palestinian exists, there is no wrong on the other (Israeli) side, leading to saddened enduring patience until The Palestinian realizes what it must do. Territorial creep is the price The Palestinian pays for failing to conform. Since Abbas as The Palestinian has no enforcement power over these recent violent acts, his verbal submission would do nothing but alienate him further from those he really can’t control anyway. The Israeli State is in exactly the position it was before the submission; Abbas is worse off. This is progress towards Two States.

      Reply to Comment
      • Average American

        It’s insulting to expect a man to dance like that. It must be terribly amusing for the American Jews he’s forced to visit. They first demean him then make their demands. Good for Mr. Abbas that he didn’t accept their demands! And who are those guys anyway, shadowy “The American Jews”, what is that? And what are they trying to hold over our heads if we don’t do like they say? Money? Screw you guys! I’ll be poor and keep my pride!

        Reply to Comment
      • XYZ

        I completely disagree with your assertion that “Abbas has no enforcement power over the recent acts of violence”. This excuse has been used for decades, also regarding Arafat’s role…”he is weak, we have to strengthen him by making more concessions to him, etc, etc”. There is an armed Palestinian police force that can arrest terrorists and troublemakers, and they are quite efficient at removing people who oppose Abbas. In addition, the FATAH-PA gives information to Israel regarding HAMAS’s activities in order to have the SHABAK and IDF take care of them for Abbas.
        Abbas refused to say anything against the recent violence to his own people, and he only “condemned it” for the benefit of his Jewish audience which he then retracts as soon as he returns home. I recall a report where Arafat told an audience of his that he was forced to make statements to Israelis ans Westerners that seem to contradict the policies of the “Palestinian Revolution” but he was really still loyal to the terrorist strategy of FATAH. This double game has gone for decades and Israelis are well aware of it. That is why even Leftist Israelis have lost faith in the whole “peace process” charade.
        The ONLY basis for an agreement is “1967 in exchange for 1948″ and since the Palestinians vehemently reject this, there is no possiblilty for an agreement, no matter what Obama says or thinks.

        Reply to Comment
        • That’s right, XYZ, the PA can go anywhere in Hebron it likes.

          Reply to Comment
    2. aristeides

      Where are all the cries for Netanyahu to go grovel in front of American Palestinians?

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel