Appreciate this article? +972 depends on your support -- click here to help us keep going

Analysis News

A history of violence in Qusra: Not 'clashes,' but 'pogroms'

The attack against Palestinians in Qusra yesterday was not a ‘clash,’ it was a pogrom – and, as usual, it took place under the aegis of the IDF.

By Yesh Din, written by Yossi Gurvitz

IDF soldiers and settlers enter the land of Qusra, 23.2.2012 (photo: Saad Al-Wadi)

A group of settlers coming from the direction of one of the most notorious outposts, Esh Kodesh, raided the Palestinian village of Qusra yesterday (Saturday). Some six Palestinians were wounded. The Israeli media reported a “clash” in the village. There wasn’t one.

A clash is what happens when two sides of more-or-less equal strength face off with one another. What took place in Qusra is much more similar to the Czarist period and to the American South before the passage of the civil rights laws: a group of bullies attacking a persecuted minority, and then received the protection of law enforcement forces.

Settlers attack Palestinians in Qusra as IDF soldiers stand by (photo Sa’ad Al-Wadi)

Look at the pictures, taken yesterday: settlers and soldiers firing together at the residents of Qusra, while the latter stand on their lands. The regular Israel, whose media makes an effort not to report what goes on in the West Bank – more on this below – will automatically excuse it by saying the army has to put down “disturbances of order.” Okay. So what were the settlers doing there?

A settler (far on the right) pointing a gun to Palestinians at the plantations of Qusra village, February 23 2013 (photo: Saad Al-Wadi)

Qusra is a target of particularly wild attacks from settlers to the point where Yesh Din sent an urgent letter to the commander of the Judea and Samaria Division and the commander of the Police District of Samaria and Judea (‘SHAI’) two months ago, demanding they protect the residents from the settlers. We have dozens of complaints by Qusra residents about attacks by settlers. At this point, as far as we know, not a single raider was indicted.

The repeating pattern is one of attacks, theft and property damage – with the police doing nothing and the army becoming a part of the problem. In an incident from last September, Palestinians were attacked by settlers; one Palestinian was reportedly kidnapped by them for a short while. In response, the army forces arrived…. and used tear gas and stun grenades on the Palestinians. The police closed the case, claiming the “perpetrator was unknown.”

A similar incident took place in July 2011, when settlers attacked herdsmen and butchered one of their sheep in front of their very eyes, according to the complaint. The army arrived, and – you guessed it – joined in on the attack on the herdsmen. Many residents made their way to the site, as did some 40 settlers; the army used crowd dispersal weapons, but only against the Palestinians.

Two months later, a Palestinian asked the IDF gunmen to order the settlers to stop uprooting his trees, which they were doing as the gunmen watched idly by. Angry words were exchanged between the Palestinian and the commanding officer, who according to the complaint, ended the argument by firing five rounds – four rubber bullets and one live bullet – at the Palestinian. The gunmen further attacked other Palestinians at the scene, including a 13-year-old boy.

In March 2011, there was an unusually serious incident in Qusra: settlers were raiding the village and the residents organized to defend themselves. As a result of fire by the settlers and the IDF gunmen, at least six (according to the gunmen) or seven (according to the residents) residents were wounded by live gunfire. Three others were wounded by rocks thrown by settlers. The army, naturally, did not use crowd dispersal weapons on the raiders, just on their victims.

And this is just a sample. There have been many other incidents. So what is going on here? For starters, there is a symbiosis between the settlers and the army. They are becoming two arms of the same militia. The army has an built-in problem: it is incapable of understanding that its duty is to protect the residents, not just Jews. No one has highlighted this problem better than the IDF spokesperson, Brig.-Gen. Yoav Mordechai. In December 2011, following an attack by a large number of settlers on an IDF base, reporter Carmela Menashe asked Mordechai how an army colonel who was stoned by the settlers ought to have reacted. He replied (Hebrew): “I assume, Carmela, that you don’t expect the colonel to open fire at a Jew standing in front of him. I’m certain that’s not what you meant.” Of course, shooting at Palestinian stone throwers is daily activity for the IDF.

Another problem is the existence of the Kfir Brigade, which exists specifically to serve the occupation. Many of its soldiers are settlers, and some belong to the “ultra-Orthodox Nahal” battalion. There have been several incidents in this particular brigade in which soldiers announced they would refuse an order to evict outposts, which makes it incapable of doing its job. The fact that such soldiers are deployed specifically in the West Bank is indicative of the attitude of the IDF.

And then there is the media problem. Not so long ago, any self respecting Israeli media outlet would have a Palestinian affairs reporter. Nowadays, few do, but most of them have “settlement affairs” reporters. The result is that Israelis no longer receive information about the territories they occupy and for whose inhabitants they are responsible. The media knows such news annoys its readers, and as most of them have become purely commercial outfits, they don’t have an interest in annoying those paying for their product.

So when everything blows up, and there is reason to believe the fuse is already lit, the Israelis – those who commit the crimes, those in law enforcement who cover them up, those who voluntarily close their eyes and their media enablers – will assume their favorite position, the natal one, and wail to the heavens that they don’t know how this happened.

Hath not a Palestinian eyes? Hath not a Palestinian hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, heal’d by the same means? Warm’d and cool’d by the same winter and summer, as a Jew is? If you prick them, do they not bleed? If you tickle them, do they not laugh? If you poison them, do they not die?

Written by Yossi Gurvitz in his capacity as a blogger for Yesh Din, Volunteers for Human Rights. A version of this post was first published on Yesh Din’s blog.

For additional original analysis and breaking news, visit +972 Magazine's Facebook page or follow us on Twitter. Our newsletter features a comprehensive round-up of the week's events. Sign up here.

View article: AAA
Share article
Print article
  • COMMENTS

    1. Harold

      Excellent article. Your analogies are, tragically, extremely apt.

      Reply to Comment
    2. Your description of the media sounds like evolving fascism, where the State and corporate interests coincide via a strong ideology, suppressing alternatives as inherently unsound or traitorous. So “saying the army has to put down ‘disturbances of order.’” refers to all resistence to the decreed “order.” I find some commentors to this site similarly impose a single order view when decrying others.

      With only one voice, there is nothing to hear.

      Reply to Comment
    3. dickerson3870

      RE: “Look at the pictures, taken yesterday: settlers and soldiers firing together at the residents of Qusra, while the latter stand on their lands. The regular Israel . . . will automatically excuse it by saying the army has to put down ‘disturbances of order’.” ~ Yossi Gurvitz

      FROM THE FILM “ADAM RESURRECTED” (2008)[adapted from Yoram Kaniuk's novel]: “You break the tiniest rule, you break the entire system.” ~ quote from the film “Adam Resurrected” spoken by the head nurse (Gina Grey) at a mental institution to a patient (Adam Stein) confined thereto

      • Gina Grey: “There are rules, Adam!”
      • Adam Stein: “Compassion. Mercy. Nurse, what happened to the…”
      • Gina Grey: “You break the tiniest rule, you break the entire system.”

      SOURCE – http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0479341/quotes

      Reply to Comment
      • That’s exactly how it seems to me.

        Reply to Comment
    4. rsgengland

      This situation will continue until there is some sort of negotiated settlement.
      Both Palestinian governments have long passed their sell by dates and are no longer democratically elected or representative or legitimate.
      Let them hold elections, get a proper mandate from their electorates, and state what their positions are.
      Israel must state its position.
      When both parties have explained why, and the reasons that they have rejected parts of the others mandates, negotiations can start.
      Coming back to your use of the term ‘POGRAM’, why is it necessary to continue to plunder the Jews past misfortunes, to justify the continuous negativity displayed by the Palestinians when it comes to anything Israeli.
      Pograms were a form of ‘State Sanctioned Racist Violence’, usually employed to divert the attention of the populace away from other pressing problems that could cause the ‘administration serious inconvenience’.
      The present unrest does not meet any of the criteria relating to a ‘pogram’.
      Greg loves the term ‘evolving Fascism’ in relation to Israel.
      The Palestinians though are ruled by regimes, whose ideologies are rooted in the Fascism of the 1920′s and 30′s.

      Reply to Comment
      • Jonny

        “Pograms were a form of ‘State Sanctioned Racist Violence’” – I fail to see how the incident in the article above differs from you definition of a pogrom. If the attacks above are witnessed (or even undertaken) by the IDF who protect the perpetrators then these are state sanctioned even if only tacitly. As this type of action is widespread and has been going on for years I suspect it is policy.

        Reply to Comment
        • Leen

          I have a feeling too it is policy and settlers merely act as surrogates, or at the very least the State does not necessarily ‘object’ to their incitement and violence in the West Bank.

          Reply to Comment
    5. Mikesailor

      Consonants: “State Sanctioned Racist Violence” is exactly what Israel is engaged in. So why do you object to the term “Pogrom”? If the shoe fits…

      Reply to Comment
      • rsgengland

        Your love of the term ‘consonants’ is repetitive,
        The pogroms in Russia and other countries were ordered by state directive, with the state actively leading the police and populace in an orgy of mass killing and destruction.
        Think of another name for low level communal violence (with occasional property damage, and very rarely death).
        The SHOE DOES NOT FIT!!!!!

        Reply to Comment
    6. Danny

      Looking at that picture with the IDF soldiers standing next to the Jewish terrorists, only one question comes to my mind: What kind of sick, depraved individual would serve in an IDF unit that collaborates with Jewish pogromists and assists them in their persecution of Palestinians? This is obviously a case of “birds of a feather”, because if it was me doing reserve duty in that place, I would try to protect the Palestinians.

      Reply to Comment

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    Name (Required)
    Mail (Required)
    Website
    Free text

© 2010 - 2014 +972 Magazine
Follow Us
Credits

+972 is an independent, blog-based web magazine. It was launched in August 2010, resulting from a merger of a number of popular English-language blogs dealing with life and politics in Israel and Palestine.

Website empowered by RSVP

Illustrations: Eran Mendel